• Skip to main content

Uncharted Veterinary Conference

Revolutionary veterinary marketing & business conference for those forging their own paths and telling their own stories.

  • Account
    • Log In/Out
  •  

management

Aug 02 2023

How Can I Scale My Practice If I Can’t Add DVMs?

This week on the podcast…

This week on the Uncharted Podcast, Dr. Andy Roark and practice management geek Stephanie Goss are deep in a conversation that was inspired by a recent discussion with a colleague about how to scale up the size of their practice when it feels like everyone else is paying WAY more than they are for associate veterinarian salaries. After a promising interview, one of our friends was highly disappointed when the associate candidate went somewhere else for a starting salary that was more than this practice owner pays themselves. Where do you even start with trying to grow when it feels like money is tight? Let's get into this…

Uncharted Veterinary Podcast · UVP – 243 – How Can I Scale My Practice If I Can't Add DVMs?

You can also listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music or wherever you get your podcasts.

Do you have something that you would love Andy and Stephanie to role play on the podcast – a situation where you would love some examples of what someone else would say and how they would say it? If so, send us a message through the mailbag! We want to hear your challenges and would love to feature your scenario on the podcast. Head over to the mailbag and submit it here

Submit your questions here: unchartedvet.com/mailbag


Upcoming Events

All Upcoming Events


Episode Transcript

Stephanie Goss:

How many times have you called a client in the last three days, left a voicemail and then had somebody call back and say, “I had a missed call from you,” not even having listened to the voicemail? Look, the data shows clients want texting, they want online and digital communication. So, if your practice does not offer texting two-way with your clients, you are missing out in a big way. And you're also in luck because our friends at Simple Texting have done the research that one in three clients check their text notifications within a minute of receiving a text. One in three. And that goes up to 85% of all of our clients within the first five minutes after receiving a text.

So, if you are listening to this and your practice isn't yet texting two-way with your clients, you are missing out in a big way. And I don't want you to miss out anymore and neither does Andy. So our friends at Simple Texting have put together a deal for you, our Uncharted listeners. That's right, they have got texting plans that you can try for free for 14 days. But if you go to simpletexting.com/uncharted, they are going to give you up to $100 worth of free credits when you sign up for texting for your clinic. There is no reason, none whatsoever today, to not be texting with your clients. So if this is you, head over to simpletexting.com/uncharted. Get your deal, check out all of the amazing options.

Let's get into it.

Hey everybody, I am Stephanie Goss and this is another episode of the Uncharted Podcast. This week on the podcast, Andy and I are tackling a conversation that was inspired by a discussion with a colleague of ours who is struggling after having interviewed what felt like a really promising associate veterinarian. Only to find out that they took a job at another practice that is offering significantly more money than they can. They're wondering how in the heck they get ahead when they couldn't even pay themselves what this new associate is earning elsewhere, and wondering how in the heck to start scaling up their practice. This was a really fun conversation. Let's get into it.

Speaker 2:

And now the Uncharted Podcast.

Dr. Andy Roark:

And we are back. It's me, Dr. Andy Roark and the one and only Stephanie, Big Time, I'm on my way, I'm making it, Goss.

Stephanie Goss:

Can you please sing that song because I have no idea what-

Dr. Andy Roark:

You don't know Big Time? (Singing). You should listen to it. Peter Gabriel… First of all, you just dated yourself as younger than me.

Stephanie Goss:

No. But from your introduction, I was like, “I don't know actually what song he's referencing because-“

Dr. Andy Roark:

(Singing). It's such a weird song. I enjoy it. I like weird songs.

Stephanie Goss:

Also, because I like making you sing. How's it going Andy?

Dr. Andy Roark:

I am so not a good singer. It's good. It is good. Yeah. Cannot complain. Yeah, things are good. Summer's rolling along. Life is good. Staying busy. Yeah, I'm trying to think if there's anything else to tell you.

Stephanie Goss:

It is busy.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah.

Stephanie Goss:

It's so busy right now.

Dr. Andy Roark:

It's just been a while. It's been, yeah, a wild summer.

Stephanie Goss:

So I have a question to ask you.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah, sure.

Stephanie Goss:

I have been waiting. So you just got back from some time off? I need to know, was there a repeat of last year's beach chair saga when you went for beach week with your family?

Dr. Andy Roark:

I thought of you on the beach and I went and I sat my thing out and I remember the two people who came and sat right in front of me and no one did, which shows that I'm not crazy because last year I was like, “Boy, those people acted like I was the jerk” because they just came and sat right in front of me and my tent, between me and the beach and oh, they just came and put their chair. I was on a blissful beach by myself, no one else there. And these people came with their chairs and literally sat right in front of me between me and the beach. And when I said, “Hey, could you please move?” They acted like I was the biggest jerk. And so it was funny, I was sitting there in the sand looking in the beach and I a hundred percent thought of this story and I thought about you.

Stephanie Goss:

I've been waiting. I'm like, “Okay, Andy, this is the first day we've worked together since you have been back. And I'm just like, I can't leave to go on my vacation without knowing. Did we have a repeat of last year's beach saga?”

Dr. Andy Roark:

We did not. It seems like the moral fabric holding America together is actually holding up okay. I thought it was just totally coming apart.

Stephanie Goss:

Oh my gosh, that's so funny. So funny.

Dr. Andy Roark:

I will tell you this though. All right, so we're getting ready to go and the day before we leave, I got a call from the boarding facility, Noble Dog. The Noble Dog Hotel where Skipper Roark stays. And they were like, “We have to give you some news.” And I of course I'm freaking out whenever the boarding place called you the day before, you're like, “Oh no.” And they were like, “I just wanted you to know that Skipper is going to have to stay in the restricted playgroup.” And I said, “Why?” And as if I didn't know, I was like… And she was clearly uncomfortable. So this is the thing about me is when I know that someone is uncomfortable-

Stephanie Goss:

You've got to make them more uncomfortable.

Dr. Andy Roark:

I'm going to make it worse. Stephanie is like-

Stephanie Goss:

I know this from lots of experience.

Dr. Andy Roark:

And so she's like-

Stephanie Goss:

This poor girl.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yes. So she's like Steph… Or she's like, “Skipper.” Stephanie also. Stephanie Goss also needs to be in the restricted playgroup, but for different reasons. Skipper Roark is in the restricted playgroup. And I said, “Why?” And she's like, “He's too.” And she's clearly struggling. She goes, “He's an aggressive humper, he's an aggressive humper.” And I was like, “Are you sure?” And she was like, “I'm afraid so.” And so I said, “Who's going to be in the restricted group?” And she's like “Big dogs.” And I was like, “Okay, but he's not going to be alone?” And she was like, “Oh no, no, there's going to be other dogs, but just not-“

Stephanie Goss:

He can't be with the little dogs.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yes, he can't be with the little dogs.

Stephanie Goss:

Which is so funny because I had the dog that was the opposite to Skipper because I had the big dog that had to be with the little dogs because she was afraid of her own shadow and she was about a thousand times their size. But you would pick her up and she'd be out there with all the little micro chihuahuas and be happy as can be.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Oh yeah. No skipper's just annoying. He's just annoying. He's not bad, well, he's bad, but he's… Mostly, he's just annoy… He has no chill. He has no… You know when you take a dog to the dog park and they immediately get there and try to sniff everybody, that's Skipper. But it doesn't stop. The whole time he's in the dog park he is in that mode. He annoys me and he is not even sniffing me. So I take him there. And so I take him and I go to drop him off and she's like, “Yeah, as we said, he's in the restricted playgroup and I just need you to initial this sheet.”

And so she slides me the sheet and [inaudible 00:07:45] and on the sheet it says, they have all the little boarding parts all typed out and it says, “No Buster Zelensky on his sheet.” And I said, “What's a Buster Zelensky?” And she said, “Oh, he's another dog.” And I was like, “Oh.” And I said, “Buster doesn't get along with Skipper?” And she was like, “No, Buster particularly doesn't like Skipper.” And as I left for the beach, I left with the knowledge that there was a Buster Zelensky form somewhere that said, “No Skipper Roark” on it. And it made me happy. I was like-

Stephanie Goss:

So you have officially become that client?

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah, no, Buster Zelensky's owners dropped that dog off and they have to initial a thing that says “No Skipper.”

Stephanie Goss:

No Skipper Roark.

Dr. Andy Roark:

So anyway.

Stephanie Goss:

Oh my gosh. Skipper has reached a whole new level of bad dog.

Dr. Andy Roark:

I keep thinking he's going to mellow, but he's just not. And oh, Jacqueline was like, she's like, “I wonder if those guys would've traded Moose for Skipper” because Moose was the dog we met, when we were hiking. And I was like, “Boy, if they would do that deal, I'd fly him out here for him.” If it was a straight-up Moose, the golden retriever who I met for all of three minutes or Skipper Roark who I've had for five years going with Moose.

Stephanie Goss:

Poor Skipper.

Dr. Andy Roark:

[inaudible 00:09:16].

Stephanie Goss:

Okay.

I'm excited because we have been having a lot of conversation in the Uncharted community about growing practices and about finding new doctors. And I think everybody in veterinary medicine knows that we're facing a massive veterinarian shortage. And there's like, I don't know, I think the last study I saw, I feel like it was out of AVMA, but was like there's something like 18 open veterinarian positions for every one new graduate coming out of school. And so there's tons of jobs and not enough people and everybody's looking at how can they grow their practices and how can they be attractive, particularly smaller hospitals in an environment in vet med that is rapidly getting bigger in terms of corporates. And so I think there's this perception, I'm just going to say it up front. This is probably going to be an episode where Stephanie steps on a soapbox a few times. Because I think there's this perception of bet med that corporates have this magic money tree that they just shake and all the money falls out and they can pay veterinarians way more than the small guy.

And I know I've had this conversation with some of my friends and so we had one of our community members who was asking some questions and they were like, “I'm trying to grow my practice and I'm looking at this and I would like to have the discussion.” And you and I had gotten a letter in the mailbag at the same time from a clinic who was like, “Hey, I just recently interviewed a vet and I thought it went really, really well. We really connected. It seemed like a great cultural fit. So I made an offer and then I had a follow-up conversation and they were like, ‘I really loved you and I really loved the practice and I'm taking another job in the area because they offered me a schedule that was only working three days a week and for significantly more money. And so I really appreciate your time, but this is what I'm going to do.'”

And so the writer in the mailbag was saying, “I'm feeling really frustrated and I feel like I'm doing something wrong because I can't pay that much. And I know that there are things that I'll be able to do for my practice, for my patients, for my team if I grow the practice. How do I get bigger if I can't add doctors?” And that has been the conversation within our community is like, “How do we make that jump into the bigger pond from a one or two, one and a half doctor practice? How do we make that leap?” Because when you're that size, it feels insurmountable, the comparison between yourself and the big guys. And I just thought it was such a fun conversation and I am really looking forward to diving into this one with you.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah, no, I like this a lot. I think this is good. Let's just start to roll into the head space here. So you're the practice owner, practice manager, team lead, whatever, where you're like, “This has just happened and I'm reacting to it.” The first thing that I want to say to people… I'm going to start off this by being annoying just so you know I'm going to be annoying-

Stephanie Goss:

You're going to be Skipper-

Dr. Andy Roark:

Because I'm-

Stephanie Goss:

Okay, let's do it.

Dr. Andy Roark:

No, I'm going to be that person who says things that you know are true, but you really don't want to hear it and it's just annoying. And I'm going to ask some questions that at first you're like, “Why would you ask that stupid question?” And then you're like, “Okay.” And I'm probably going to make it a bit more complicated than it feels like it should be. Because people generally come to us and they have this question and they're like, “How do I scale my practice?” And what they want us to say is, “Here, sell this widget that you didn't know existed.”

Stephanie Goss:

Here's the magic recipe.

Dr. Andy Roark:

“Add this service that you are unaware of and voila scaled practice.” And of course, of course it's not true. We're going to go into that first of all. So I'm just going to go ahead and give that annoying warning of this is going to be a little frustrating if you were like, “I've got my pen and paper. Tell me the thing to do to grow the revenue in my practice immediately.”

Stephanie Goss:

This is not that episode.

Dr. Andy Roark:

It's going to be a disappointment, yeah.

All right, so I'm going to start with a frustrating thing that people say, but I say it all the time. Comparison is the thief of joy. And here's what I mean before people go, “Wait a second, this is, what are we talking about?” Comparison is the thief of joy. Comparing your little independent practice to one of the thousands of practices owned by the Mars Corporation is a losing proposition. Especially if you let them frame up the comparison meaning, “I'm going to look at them and think about all the things they can do that I can't do or all the things they have that I don't have.” And I say, if that's how you're going to look at this, you are always going to be unhappy with the beautiful little practice that you built and that you run. You're just going to feel bad about yourself all the time because you're never going to have that level of resources. You're just not.

I had an article that came out in Today's Veterinary Business earlier this month. It came out in the June issue. And it was about the rulers we choose, meaning measuring rulers. We all pick how we define success. And so you got to be really careful about what rulers you choose to measure your practice. And so I know that's not what the person's writing about, but I just want to say it up front and say, if you compare yourself in the ways that the big corporations have huge advantages, you're always going to feel like you're failing or your practice is less than. But guys, that's not the only measure and that's not how most people see the world. It's really not.

The other thing I'll say that I have found that people don't like to hear this, it sucks, but it's not true, is it's not a fair game in a lot of ways. Meaning, my gut is that this is less common than it was, but for a while, a couple of years ago we had a lot of groups that were buying up practices and they had a lot of private equity money behind them and they were in growth mode. And so they just had these buckets of money that did not make sense and they were spending money that had no basis in business reality. And we heard horror stories about… it's not horror stories depending on who you are. And again, I'm not trying to knock the medical providers on the other side of this, but there were companies that were dropping money on doctor salaries, especially new graduate doctor salaries, and they were dropping these huge contracts on doctors and independent practices were looking and saying “That doctor is never going to produce enough money to justify what they're being paid by any realistic metric or measurement. How is this happening?”

And I think it affected me at the time because I've always been one who said, “The numbers have to make sense and we're all playing this game where the numbers have to make sense,” but when you have this investment money that's coming in, the numbers, at least in the short term, don't have to make sense. And so there were just things that were not… There was not a way that you could compete with them as far as dollars and what they were doing. Just it did not square up. Now, the good news is those birds always come home to roost. At some point the people who are spending that money, they're expecting a return on their investment and that is… So things are going to come back around, they're going to have to even out. And I think we're already seeing that. I think a lot of that stuff has started to mellow out a bit, but it still goes on.

And if you're a little independent practice, you just don't have private equity money that says “Get bigger, get bigger. I don't care what it costs.” You're just playing a different game. And so the first thing I would say is comparison is a thief of joy and it can be frustrating and you have the right to be frustrated and I think everybody would be frustrated. However, you need to think about why you got into this and you need to think about what is important to you about having a practice and why your practice is special and how you are going to measure success. Because if you measure success as a race against the Mars Company to earn profit, I'm like, “Buddy, you're taking a pocket knife into a nuclear arms race. You're not supposed to be here”

You're not doing anything wrong, but man, the way that we frame success in our minds is a big deal. And so we're talking about head space. Be kind to yourself, recognize where you're comparing yourself and just try to put that down and say, “Given that this is the landscape we live in, how am I going to be successful in the way that I want to be successful?” And that it's so much healthier and it will make you so much happier and you'll still have a good business, but you're not fighting an unwinnable battle.

And the worst thing that I see is small independent practices that have huge hearts and people on the ground that love the practice and want it to be special, giving up their love and the things that make their practice special to try to chase after someone who's not bad, they're just running an entirely different model and they're playing a different game from you. And so I've seen people give up the things that they love and that make them unique so that they could try to run after a massive corporation that's just playing the capitalism game. And that's not bad. But God, don't give up the magic. Don't be upset with your beautiful baby because it's not something totally different than what you made it to be.

Stephanie Goss:

I agree with you a hundred percent on the comparison piece. And I think the other piece of it is, for me is sitting back and asking yourself what do you actually want and why do you want it? I think you need to know what why is to drive yourself. But I ask, it's so often… To your point about playing the comparison game, so often I talk to independent practices and I'm like, “What is it that you want and what is being driven by should?” They think that they should be doing this. They think that this is the next step they should take, but there's not actually a why behind that. It's like, “I have one doctor and I want to retire and so I need another doctor”, okay, that makes sense. “Well, I have two doctors and I feel like the next step should be that I should get to three or four.” Why? What's the why there? Do you want a bigger practice? Do you want to employ more people? Do you want to get a bigger facility and in order to do that you need more? What is the why?

I think that for me, the head space starts with sitting back and looking at what are you trying to do and why are you trying to do it? Because you need to get really crystal clear. For me as a manager, the questions that I'm going to ask you have to do with numbers and sense. And if you don't know why you're trying to do what you are trying to do, you're not going to be able to answer any of my questions and you're not going to be able to solve this problem. And I think that that's the thing that I have seen time and time again. I've had conversations with practice owners and practice managers who are just like, “This is an unsolvable problem. I'm just going to give up because I can't compete.” And to your point, we're often competing with a should or a thing like competing with it, being a small practice, trying to look and measure yourself comparative to a giant corporation. That's not the right question to be asking yourself.

Dr. Andy Roark:

You're speaking to my soul. Man, the whole should game, it's so hard to get away from and it's a byproduct in some ways, I think, of access to information that we have now that we didn't use to. I don't know that most people running vet clinics pre-internet knew what other vet clinics were doing. They definitely were not bombarded with these continued messages about what it means to have a “successful practice.” They were just largely out there doing their thing. And I'm not convinced that that's so bad, really as long as you are happy and people would say, “But by having the best business practices hammered into us, we've made better practices financially.” And that is true and knowledge is power, but I think that there's that this is what you're supposed to do with your practice or this is what you're supposed to do with your career.

And so I want to expand it out because I've been seeing this a lot. There are messages about what a practice is supposed to look like and what the life of a practice is supposed to be, which is bigger, bigger, bigger. Or if you can't get bigger, multiples. If you not going to grow this practice, you need to have a second practice. And I go, “Who made that the case? Who said that's what should happen?” And it's been amazing, over the last five years, I have seen more people pushing back against that and saying, “I don't want to run a bigger practice. I want to run this practice with fewer headaches. I want to run this practice and just have it run more smoothly and simply. I'd like this practice to be more profitable, yes, but I don't want to manage seven doctors. I like managing two doctors plus myself and that's what I enjoy.”

Lifestyle business is not a dirty word. It shouldn't be. Some people say it is. I've felt that way as people are like, “Oh, a lifestyle business, that just means you didn't build something that could scale.” And it goes, “No, I strongly disagree with that.” It means you decided what you wanted to create and what was important to you and you made it, but boy, should is such a powerful thing. There's so many doctors that feel like they should move into management, but they don't want to move to management. But that's what you're supposed to do because it shows that you have your ish together and that's what you do.

And we see it even more in the paraprofessionals, which means you're a good tech, you should be the head tech. And you're the head tech and you're doing a good job, you should be the practice manager. And then if you're in a corporate structure, you should be a regional manager. And onward and upward and you go, “Why is that what should happen?” What if you don't want that? What if that's not what's interesting to you? But man, this is the march that should happen. That's such a powerful force.

And so I want to tag onto that as well. And so it's interesting, and I said I was going to be annoying at the beginning, but we get this question and it says, “How do I scale my business if I can't add DVMs?” That's the question. And so I push back on that and say, are you sure that you have the right outcome that you care about? Is financial growth generating more money…is that really what you want and care about? And so we talk a lot about root cause analysis. I would say, why is scaling important to you? And I don't know what they would say. I would guess they would say something like, “I want to be able to attract veterinarians that want to come so that we can handle the workload that we have.” And that's really important is “I want to attract enough people that I can serve my community.”

And then I would say, great, do you recognize now that scaling and generating more revenue is a way to attract more doctors, but really what you want is to attract more doctors. It's not to generate more revenue. The revenue is a means to an end and the end being “I want to be a place that people want to come and stay.” And so I hope that you see that I've already tried to cut loose the bonds that are around your hand and say, “This doesn't have to be about money.” Sure, let's see if we can get our practice to be a bit more profitable so that we can sweeten the pot, but ultimately we may never be just minting money. I'm confident there are other ways that we can find people who want to work with us. And I'm confident that we have other things that we can offer.

And I think you're going to have a much easier time digging into the culture that you have and what makes your practice special and trying to find people who match and who said, “Yes, this is where I want to be.” Then you are ratcheting up your income so that you can compete with the specialty hospital that's trying to hire emergency doctors or whatever. I think that those can be very different things.

Stephanie Goss:

The other thing too, I think that goes back to the why. Because to your point, if my why is I want to grow because I want to retire and I need somebody to take this place over or I need to be saleable, then I would say, “What does that look like to you? Are you talking about trying to retire in the next five years or are you talking about trying to retire 20 years from now?” Because the strategy that I apply to that why, if your why is to get out in the next five years. I'm going to look at that from a very different strategy perspective than a plan that involves a 20-year timeline. Because do you really need another doctor today if you want to get out in 20 years or is it worth finding the right doctor, to your point, who is someone who wants to be a part of the community, who wants to take care of those clients, who wants to take care of those patients? Can you wait to find the right fit? Or is the why requiring a different plan of action?

And so I think you can't figure out how to solve this problem until you know the answer to that question. So I love your idea of asking yourself the root cause analysis and asking the fivefold why. Why do I want to do this? Why do I want to do that? And trying to figure out what is it that you're actually trying to accomplish?

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah, that's exactly it. And in that same vein, one of the things that I've been thinking a lot about recently is that we tend to tell ourselves that there are outcomes that we need. And if we can achieve this outcome, everything will be fine. If I can just generate more money in our practice, then everything will be great. If I can just get this degree that I have been fantasizing about, then everything will be great. If I could just move to the West Coast, then life would be so much better and I would have what I wanted. Whatever those things are-

Stephanie Goss:

It would, by the way.

Dr. Andy Roark:

But we have those thoughts. And so what I've been thinking a lot about recently is this idea that generally outcomes do not make that much of a difference to us. And when we say… Meaning, and I always talk about there is no dragon, meaning I spent a lot of my life chasing outcomes, chasing dragons to slay, problems to solve, challenges to overcome. And what I found is there is no challenge that you overcome and it makes you whole or it makes you happy, or makes you know that you're successful or know that you're worthy. That dragon doesn't exist. There is no dragon. And so it's the same thing with all these outcomes. And I go, “Okay, I think that we convince ourselves if I can get this outcome, my problems will go away.”

And so the workaround here and what I found great power is I don't think we really want outcomes. I think that we imagine we are going to feel a certain way or have a certain experience if we achieve an outcome. If I get this degree, I will feel confident. If I move to the West Coast, I will feel like I have freedom. I'll feel like I have freedom, I'll be out from under whatever constraints I have here. But I will feel free if I move to the West Coast. If I generate this revenue, then I'll have security. If I had more money, I would feel safe. And so there's feelings that are tied to these outcomes and so keep walking with me.

If you can recognize that, oftentimes you can identify the emotion that you're trying to have, the feeling or experience you're trying to have. You can often just go ahead and do things to get that feeling without going through the whole process of getting whatever this big outcome is that you want. And so for example, if you say, “I desperately need our practice to generate $10 million a year in revenue,” and I would say, how do you think you're going to feel when your practice generates $10 million in revenue? And you said to me, “I'm going to feel safe. I'm going to know that I'm okay. I'm going to know that if hard times come, we are fine and I'll be great.”

Now, I could at this point say, “Just so you know, when you get $10 million, you're not going to feel safe because you're going to have to keep making $10 million to keep paying your staff and it never ends.” I told you I was going to be a jerk, but I would not say that to the person. Instead, I would just let that go and I would not say anything about it. And I would say, “What can you do right now to generate feelings of safety? Are there things that we can do that are not making $10 million that can still make us feel safe? Maybe that's having a plan, maybe that's looking at our insurance coverage. Maybe that's figuring out what plan B is going to be and just being okay with it. Maybe it's thinking through what the worst case scenario is. Maybe it's making a series of safety checks that are going to stop us from getting there. But what is that? What can we do now to give you that experience?

And so going to the person who said, “How do I scale when I can't add DVMs?” What I want to say is, how are you going to feel when you do “Scale”? How's that going to make you feel? Is that going to make you feel free because you can have more time off? Is that going to make you feel… Is it going to make you feel successful because you feel like you're taking care of your community? Is that going to make you feel safe because you feel like you're not going to have your employees boycott and quit on you? And now my friends, this is why I love this so much. I get excited about these exerciseS, but I really love this, because depending on what you said to me, I would give you different recommendations.

So if you said, “If I could scale, then I would feel free because I have time off,” I would say maybe the question is not how do I scale? Maybe the question is how do I get more freedom? How do I get more time off? Because you don't need to generate revenue necessarily to have time off. There's other things that we can do. If you said, “I want to serve my community,” I go, “Great, are there other ways besides generating revenue and getting bigger that we can serve our community?” So maybe we can get that experience, that thing we want without having to go through the financial part.

And then again, if it's a safety thing, I would say, “Hey, you're not going to believe this, but getting bigger and taking on more employees, it may not actually make you feel safer.”

Stephanie Goss:

It might be more scary.

Dr. Andy Roark:

It might be more scary when you get there. And again, but what are the things that we can do now to create that?

So anyway, again, I hope that's not too woo-woo or out there, but these are things that I really think a lot about and I just… They're ideas that I'm really excited about and I just have seen so much good come out of the idea of, all right, I see that you're striving… Because we have so many people who are in our profession and they're striving and they're striving and they're striving. And that question of how are you going to feel when you get there? Imagine you succeed, what's it going to get for you? How are you going to… What's that experience going to be? Man, that is a powerful tool to understand what makes people run. A lot of times people are like, “I won't be afraid anymore.” And I'm like, “I hate to tell you, but yeah, you will be.” And so let's figure out what we can do right here and now to not be driven by fear or whatever the thing is.

Stephanie Goss:

And I'm going to be vulnerable and share. So Andy did this exercise on me one time. This is where I thought you were going when you started talking about-

Dr. Andy Roark:

I don't remember this story. No, I'm [inaudible 00:33:43]. I have such a bad memory. It's great. I'm just like every day's a new journey when people tell me what we did yesterday. It's not that bad-

Stephanie Goss:

You and I were and I were together at a conference and we were sitting down and we were having conversation about development, because you mentioned school, you asked me about development and I was like, “I feel like I probably should consider getting my MBA” and the word should came up and you were just like, “Tell me more.” And I was just like, “Well,” and I had to sit there and think about it and it was really hard. And I was just like, “Well, this is… I like education, I like growing and developing myself and I feel like I've done the practical experience things and getting my MBA would continue to fle sh out my book learning education. And I feel like I could learn things outside of veterinary medicine that I could apply.” And I don't know what else I said, but you were like, “Okay, and what would you do with that?” So you were asking me these questions and I was sitting there and I was just like… It was real hard.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah, I remember this conversation.

Stephanie Goss:

Was just like, “I don't know.” And ultimately we were sitting there and Andy made me cry, as he does. So I'm sitting there and I can't–

Dr. Andy Roark:

Not in a bad way, not in a bad… I just want to-

Stephanie Goss:

Not in a bad way, not in a bad way-

Dr. Andy Roark:

It was not a bad-

Stephanie Goss:

I started-

Dr. Andy Roark:

How dare you? Like no, it was not that.

Stephanie Goss:

Because I'm sitting there and I'm realizing, as Andy said, that a lot of it was tied up in feelings and emotions. And what I realized was that the reason why I said I thought my development goal should be to get my MBA had a lot to do with feelings and emotions. And I will tell you guys, I left that conference and I did not go sign up for an MBA. I took some of that money that I would've spent on getting my MBA. And I took myself to therapy and I started working on some of the feelings and the emotions and I actually started working with the coach and working on the feelings. Because for me, the should was motivated by personal feelings of imposter syndrome and that I didn't think that I measured up.

And for me, in my head, the story I had told myself was that if I have this piece of paper that I will be able to feel like I am qualified to be where I am and I will have letters behind my name that will make other people look at me in a different way. And what I realized through the course of the conversation was, oh, okay, A, I'm being driven by a should and that's not actually a good thing here. And also B, the why was important and I needed to do that work and dive into the feelings and do some self-work. And I think had I gone into an MBA program at that point in time, I don't think that I would have gotten out of it what I could get out of it if I went through a program like that. Now, because I had done the… I did a lot of hard work in between that conversation and where we are now. And so I think I would've had a different experience.

And so I am so glad that you talked about that and also recognizing that this is hard and this is a lot of hard work. And if you come by the answers to why very quickly when you sit down to do this, if Andy or I was in the room with you, we would both look at you and say, “That was too easy, start over, try harder.” Because the answer should not be quick and it should be hard. This should be a hard process, but the hard is worth it at the end. Because if you know your why, that's where you then can move yourself really comfortably into the action step part of this conversation. But from a manager perspective and a leadership support perspective, if you're not crystal clear as an owner on the why of why do I want to scale my practice, where am I trying to go? I can't help you. You could pay a consultant thousands, hundreds of thousands of dollars and they're still not going to be able to help you figure it out either. You have to know what that why is.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah, I remember that conversation. It was a really good conversation and the way I remember it was, you said, “I want to do this MBA,” and I said, I went through the exercise with you and I was like, “Why is that important and what do you think is going to be different when you have this and things?” And so it was, it's funny because you felt like “I should do this, I need this, it's going to change the way that people look at me and blah-blah-blah.” And we talked about it and the way that I saw you from the outside, which was fascinating was that Uncharted was growing so fast and you were right in the middle of it. And I'm like, “Here's someone who's buried in opportunities. Our biggest problem is not, we don't have opportunities, we have too many opportunities.” And that was it.

And you were like, “I need more education.” And I'm like, “We are having people throwing work at us and we can't get done the stuff that we are getting. And it's good, we can't do all the things we're excited about right now.” And so going and getting something… And again, I'm saying this because I don't want people to think, “Oh, Andy and Stephanie don't like MBAs.” It's not that, but it was just like you were like, “People look at me differently” and I just see people with this adoration in their eyes. And you had just lectured to a room of 700 people. I was glad I wasn't in the program. Because I was like, “I don't want to hear from Goss how she had twice as many people in a room as me.”

Literally, I couldn't get into the room that you were lecturing in. And you're like, “Yeah, I think people will look at me differently if I had this MBA” and I'm like, “You're out of your mind. What are you talking about?” I hope it's okay for me to say that, but –

Stephanie Goss:

And then I started crying.

Dr. Andy Roark:

And that's when you cried and that's when you cried. It was much more of a fatherly Andy like “Hmm, let's think about this.” But ultimately that's where the conversation went. But it was that. But it was really fascinating. It was really fascinating as your friend to have the talk with you. But it was that thing of… To be honest, it's intimidating to go up and talk in front of all these people and you have these feelings of like “I'm supposed to have all the answers and I'm supposed to be able to fix. Every one of them should be able to throw their practice at me and I can fix it in the air.”

But we have those should expectations of, and again, the outcome is a great example “If I had this M B A, then I could do that and if I couldn't, I would feel okay, because I would still know that I knew my stuff” and I go, “I don't think that's true.” But anyway, thank you for sharing that. But yeah, it was… Yeah, I'll always remember that of, man, we've all got these should ideas. But anyway, I'm just a big believer in that. So anyway, that's my stuff.

As we start to look at, yeah, how do I scale the practice? I wanted to get all those things out. Of course I still want to answer the question of scaling and how can we drive revenue, but I really do want to think that just because of where this comes from, the last thing that I want to say, and this could go in the action steps, but I'm going to put it in head space real quick and then I'm going to be done. Is when you're the owner, when you're the medical director, when you're the manager and we start to have thoughts like this and we're like, “We need to scale so that we can attract doctors” and things like that, it is so easy to turn to your team and essentially say, “We need to make more money. I need you guys to make more money, let's make more money. Don't you understand that we have to make more money in order to be able to pay you guys? Guys, we're going to be in trouble if we don't make more money.”

And as the team leader, when you have that either internally, that push of “We need to scale so that we can grow so we can serve the community” or that comes down from above, you have got to be so careful because there are very few things that turn that teams off as much as someone turning to them and saying, “We have to make more money, don't you know.” Even if it's for them. And people go, “But I tell them, it's so I can pay you guys.” And I'm going, “I still find that to be hugely demotivational.” Because for a long time I thought, “If they know it's so their salaries can go up, they feel differently.” And I think there's something to that, but still, I think a lot of people overplay that. It's like a lot of your people are not there for the money and when you start talking about the money, they can immediately flip to a place of, “Oh, I see what's happened. This is all about the money. That's what this place is about.” Or “That's what this leader is about.” And boy, you lose credibility really fast.

It's a real culture clash in that medicine where a lot of people immediately get turned right off about that. And so you just have to be careful when you start to… That's another reason why I go through what are we really trying to do here? Because you have to be really careful about how we talk to our team about we need to make more money, we need to increase revenue. Because if you don't do a good job of communicating the why and getting them on board, you're going to really turn them off.

Stephanie Goss:

Do you want to take a quick break and then come back and talk some action steps?

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah, let's do it.

Stephanie Goss:

All right.

Hey friends. I want to make sure that you don't miss an opportunity to talk about topics like the one we talked about on the podcast today. That's right. In October, and October 11th to be precise, we are doing our fall virtual conference. This year, we're tackling culture and I cannot wait to dive into topics about accountability and creating a culture of accountability in our practices and how do we build trust and work together. And it is going to be so much fun. We have jam-packed a one-day schedule to make it not too difficult for you to get off the floor at the practice and participate. Even though it's virtual, we build a community and connections and love to talk to one another. So this is not your passive watch CE on a screen. We are going to be doing interactive workshops, interactive discussions. We've got our choose your own adventure format and I cannot wait to dive into it. So head over to the website at unchartedvet.com/events and sign up for our culture conference happening October 11th. See you there.

Dr. Andy Roark:

All right, so let's start to do our action steps. Big things that stress coming in. Opening language that I always like for things like this when we're about to make change, especially we're starting to pushing into revenue, things like that. Anywhere we're going to start changing the way that we work, I'm a big fan of going to the team and not saying, “Guys, we got to make changes. Guys, this is not working. We can't keep up with the other guys. We got to make changes.” That's scary and it's demotivational. The best way to go at this is to say, “Guys, I love our practice. We are doing great. You guys are doing great. I see and appreciate you and we are going to the next level. We are going to make some changes. I want to start empowering our paraprofessionals more. I want to grow what we're doing. I want to help more pet owners. Guys, we can do this.”

And you feel the difference in just those two approaches. I see a lot of times… And I get it, I a hundred percent get it. It's so easy to go and say, “Guys, I'm going to be honest with you.” And again, I'm not talking about lying to people, get me wrong, but oftentimes we can frame it as “This is not working, we need to do things differently” or “You guys are amazing and we're going to do things differently so we can continue to grow.” The second is much more positive and motivational. And I think if we can frame things in that light, people tend to get on board a lot faster.

Stephanie Goss:

Yeah, I would agree with that. And I think that goes back to if you know why you're doing what you're doing, it's really easy for you to frame that. What are we going to take to the next level? It's like we want to focus on efficiency and we want to focus… Because we want to be able to take care of more patients. The whole rest of that conversation comes so much easier when you know what that why is that's driving it.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah, I completely agree. All right, so seeing that we're going to go down this road, we say how do we scale without doctors is a question, meaning how do we drive more revenue without more doctors? All right, cool. There's four levers that we can pull and usually the answer is not to pick one of these levers and pull it really hard. Usually the answer is to pick a couple of these levers, maybe start with one and do it and be gentle and pilot program and try it out and then pull a second one. And over the course of 6, 12, 18 months, start to make some adjustments here. But basically there's four levers in my mind. The first one is the price lever. It's the easiest one. Be careful. Definitely you can go to this too often, but the fastest path to success into cash or the fastest path to cash is increasing prices.

Whether you embrace them across the board or on the top 25 most common items, things like that. It's a quick way to generate revenue. Most practices have more upward mobility than they think they do. I understand why people don't like increasing prices. Of course, obviously there's a ceiling to this, but just as far as ease of implementation and straightforwardness, can you raise your prices? A straight price increase tends to generate a lot more revenue. And again, for people who don't think about this a lot, remember that when you run your business, you have a lot of fixed costs, you have a certain amount of money that is going to payroll and it's going to your hard costs. Beyond that, that money is profit that you can use to do things like hire other people and increase salaries.

And so if you increase your prices by 5%, you're not increasing your profits by 5%. You might be increasing your profits by 50% if you were only 5% profitable. And so anyway, it has an outsized impact on the bottom line, the money that you have at the end. So increasing prices is where you got to start. Do you agree?

Stephanie Goss:

Yeah, I do. And I love that. And what I would say is from a math perspective. When we got this question, my mind immediately dove into the math of getting another veterinarian. And in this conversation it was like, “Hey, this doctor took another job and they're working less days and making 40% more than I offered them.” Okay, I can work with that. Because if I take what I offered and I know what 40% more of that is, if that's my goal, if that doctor was like, “I loved you, but I'm going to work less days and make more money,” okay, I might not be able to solve the less days problem. Maybe I could, maybe I couldn't. But let's set that aside and let's just look at the money for a second.

If they need 40% more, how much more do I have to pay them? And so just using round numbers for the sake of ease. Let's say I offered a hundred thousand dollars. That's $40,000 more, that if I was paying them 40% more, so it's $140,000 instead of a hundred. So I take that difference and say, “Okay, what would I have to do now?” To your point, about that's not the number that you're going to use, but it gives me a starting place to say, “Okay, if I want to be able to offer $40,000 more, then I need to be able to generate four times more than that.” If I was a doctor and I was just saying, “I'm going to offer you this salary,” the rule of thumb is we want to pay them a cap of 25% of what they earn. So if I multiply that times four, I know what I have to generate minimally in revenue to cover that $40,000.

Now all of a sudden I have hard numbers that I can work with to your first lever, which is prices and say, “If I need to generate overall $300,000, again just round numbers, $300,000 more in a year to pay this vet $40,000 more or a vet $40,000 more. How do I make $300,000? Can I do that on a price increase alone. What would that look like? Is it taking the top 25 things and raising them $2? Is it raising prices on not shopped items by a hundred dollars? Is it some combination of those things?” Now you have an end goal that helps you look much more clearly and in a focused way at the raising prices.

And it isn't just this like “I guess maybe I'm going to do a 2% price increase and hope that it makes me enough money that someday down the road I can pay another vet the money that they're asking for.” No, stop that. Stop it right now, let's look at the numbers and say, if you wanted to hire this vet tomorrow and you're feeling like you couldn't afford to pay them the $140,000, what do you have to do to get there? And you have to look at it from that concrete numbers perspective. And so looking at those prices, it allows you to say, “Oh, okay, if I increase my fecals by $10, how much of that 40,000 am I going to generate just doing the same amount of fecals as I did last year, not doing more, just the same things that I've already done?” And you can look at it from that hard numbers perspective.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah, I love it. I think the second lever for me is increasing efficiency. This is, with the staff that we have, how do we more work? So how do we scale without adding doctors, basically? How do we do more work? I don't want to get too far into this, because [inaudible 00:51:51] be a whole thing. I think we've got podcasts, I'm sure we do on increasing efficiency. But a lot of this is… There's a couple things. One is just where do we get faster without giving up the client experience? And so some of it is training. Can we train on dentistry so that we're getting patients down and getting dentals done faster and getting people out, we can get more dentals done in a day, we can look at our systems to move more quickly and get these things done? Is we can add services like texting or things to make the front desk more efficiency? In-room checkout? Whatever the things are. And again, your practice is going to need different things.

Look at what happens in your practices and look at where things bogged down. Where are people standing with leashes waiting for help? What are they doing from a staffing capacity as far as having people where they're needed? But all of these things, I can keep going on and on and on. A lot of it is looking how do we get faster at what we're doing? And so a lot of times it's training. It's looking at our repeatable processes, the things that we do again and again and again and again in our day and figuring out how to make them go 10% faster. And boy, that makes a huge difference when you're talking about something you do hundreds of times. So anyway, that's the stuff that I'm starting to look at. Can I use technology to take weight off of communications at front desk? Things like that.

Stephanie Goss:

Yeah, I love it. I love it because from a management perspective, that's going to be the first question I ask an owner doctor who says to me, “I want to hire another vet.” Have we actually maxed out on our efficiency and capacity, or do we need more paraprofessional staff or do we need better trained paraprofessional staff? Where can we do things faster and more efficiently? And if the answer to that is no, that's where we have to start.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah, I love it. So that's lever number two. Lever number three is shifting focus towards the profitable services. If you make a bunch of profit on fecals, let's just say, I used that earlier, can we increase the number of fecals that we do? And so there's absolutely like, “Hey, this is parasiticide and parasite detection is something that is a big driver for us. Let's start talking about our fecal compliance. If it's a big driver for us and we're 55% compliant, can we get up to 65% compliant? What would that look like?” And there's lots of different ways to do that as far as education, as far as adding things like drop-off cups and thing… I'm a huge fan of doing stuff like that. There's lots of different ways that we can do that.

Dentistry. Is dentistry a big driver for you? Are you maxed out in how you're talking about dentistry and what you're doing to get dental compliance? Can we start doing dental callbacks that say, “Hey, your pet was in and was given a grade two of four dental disease score and you were in six weeks ago and so we wanted to call and check in and just say, ‘Hey, that's really important, do you want to go ahead and set that up?'” And just doing more things like that. I've seen programs like that that are extremely effective in getting people in. [inaudible 00:54:54] if dentistry is your jam and it's where you make revenue, can we get people in for that?

We got a new ultrasound and it's one of the swanky ones where we are able to send it out digitally to the radiographer or radiologist. And this is a revenue generator for us. Are the techs talking about ultrasound? Are we doing all the things we could be doing with it? Are we using it less than we could be? Are there wellness plans that we are not talking about? Can we get our wellness plan utilization up? And again, that's just shifting over and saying, “I know these things take time. Let's make sure that we're focusing on them.” I'm not talking about introducing new things.

But anyway, whatever the profitable services are for you, let's focus on those. It's funny, a lot of times I see people being like, “We've got to get people in here” and they'll get them in for a rabies vaccine. And I'm like, “That's a lot of effort for something that doesn't move the needle.” Again, good medicine, good for the pet, but if the goal is to get revenue up so that we can hire and get more help, let's be smart about what we're focusing on to make sure that we're growing the right parts of our business through awareness.

Stephanie Goss:

I love that. I agree with that. What's the fourth lever?

Dr. Andy Roark:

The fourth one is near and dear to both of our hearts. It's leverage your paraprofessionals. If you can't hire doctors and we need to get more profitable, we need to scale our business, it's time. It's time. It's time to look at our paraprofessionals and saying, “Are they working at the top of their license?” For me, are there products and services the paraprofessionals could deliver that we're not doing? If you're not doing tech appointments, man, that's a quick and easy way to start leveraging and scaling. It's amazing what techs can do. I have to throw out here and say you need to look at your state Practice Act because mileage may vary depending on the state. You need to pay attention to the regulations. So I can't just say, “Do these things” because it's different across the country. But you need to look at the Practice Act and figure out what can my paraprofessionals do that right now my doctors are doing and and how do we delegate to them?

So anyway, just think about that. Look at your state Practice Act, couple the state Practice Act with a training program, it's not okay to be like, “That's it. We're doing tech appointments. Go.” Let's figure out what a tech appointment looks like. Let's make a plan. Let's train for it so the staff feels good and knows what's expected. The clients are going to have a good experience. There's some legwork here, but let's start to do that.

The last thing I will throw out, I got to plug it. If you're like, “Hey, this sounds good, I'd be interested in having my techs jump in the rooms and do more stuff. And I don't really know how I would train them though.” I have an on-demand training program called the Exam Room Communication Toolkit. You can find it at drandyroark.com. It is 17 different tools for working in the exam room effectively. It is made for teams to take together. So it is great whether you're using your texts and appointments or whether you're thinking about doing it, getting the team, whether it's techs and doctors or just techs, getting them together and watching it and having discussions about it. And it's made to have discussion sections and things like that. It's really a hundred percent meant to be getting your people together to train on how you want to do it in your practice.

But man, again, I'm sure there's other research out there. I have not seen anything nearly as complete as this exam room training course. And so it's on demand. You can take it whenever you want, but that's over at drandyroark.com. And it is my best attempt at trying to help you train your staff to be effective talking to pet owners.

Stephanie Goss:

Yeah, I love it. You're right, this is the place that is near and dear to our heart. And I love that you mentioned using them at the top of their license because so often when I talk to other managers or practice owners and we get into the weeds and I ask them, “Tell me what your team is doing.” There are so many areas where the doctors are doing things that they don't have to do and in states that allow technicians to be utilized more. And so I think especially this tends to be the case in a small practice. And so I think that's a place where you have to start. And I think you're spot on, Andy, that if we say, “Okay, if driving revenue is really the why here, and we're trying to scale from a revenue perspective,” if you go through and you check all four of these boxes, there is really no reason why you shouldn't be able to pay someone an acceptable market rate salary and be paying yourself that first and foremost and then be paying someone else or multiple someone else's that as well.

And what I would say is that if you look at it and you're like, “I still can't afford to pay somebody,” something's wrong in the equation because the reality is we should be able to scale the practice by pulling on a combination of these four levers without having to add another veterinarian. And if we've pulled the four levers and we've maxed everything out, we should be able to afford it.

Dr. Andy Roark:

No, I agree. So anyway, that's what I got. Those are the four levers that I see. There may be some other things that people can nitpick and add in, and I'm sure there's a million different ways to do this. Anyway, just big picture, that's how I look at it start to make a plan about what's the low hanging fruit? It's amazing how often people be like, “We need to get revenue up. Let's start building another wing onto the hospital where we're going to offer physical therapy.” And I'm like, “There's a lot of low hanging fruit over here that we could just have if you just want.”

Stephanie Goss:

Let's start with fecals.

Dr. Andy Roark:

They're like “No, physical therapy building.” I'm like, “Okay.”

Stephanie Goss:

That's it. We're done.

Dr. Andy Roark:

That's it. We're done. That's it. That's all I got.

Stephanie Goss:

Have a great week, everybody.

Dr. Andy Roark:

I'll be in the restricted play area. I'll see you later.

Stephanie Goss:

Everybody, that's a wrap on another episode of the podcast. Thanks so much for spending your time with us. We truly enjoy spending part of our week with you. As always, Andy and I enjoyed getting into this topic.

I have a tiny little favor to ask, actually, two of them. One is, if you can go to wherever you source your podcast from and hit the review button and leave us a review. We love hearing your feedback and knowing what you think of the podcast. And number two, if you haven't already, hit the subscribe button.

Thanks so much for listening, guys. We'll see you soon.

Written by Dustin Bays · Categorized: Blog, Podcast · Tagged: communication, culture, management

Jul 26 2023

When is Burned Out TOO Burned Out To Continue Working?

Uncharted Veterinary Podcast Episode 242 Cover Image

This week on the podcast…

This week on the Uncharted Podcast, Dr. Andy Roark and practice management geek Stephanie Goss are diving back into the mailbag to tackle an email from a team leader who is worried that one of their technicians has reached a point of no return with their “I don't give a flying fig” attitude. This tech used to have a ton of heart and their pride in their work showed through everything and now it seems like they just brush off every mistake they make and they are making a lot of them! This team lead is Concerned-for-her-but-also-the-patients and asking Andy and Stephanie to weigh in on a very important question – When is burned out “too” burned out to keep going? Let's get into this…

Uncharted Veterinary Podcast · UVP – 242 – When Is Burned Out TOO Burned Out To Continue Working?

You can also listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music or wherever you get your podcasts.

Submit your questions here: unchartedvet.com/mailbag


Upcoming Events

Calling all Team Leads – if you are a lead CSR, a lead Technician, a lead Kennel tech – we want you to come connect with your peers and our Uncharted Community! We have a brand new event we want to see your faces at.

Uncharted’s Team Leads Summit is an immersive 1-day virtual event designed to connect team leads and help you tackle the challenges unique to your role in veterinary practice. Kick off the day with an inspiring general session, learn from some of the brightest minds in vet med, and then dive in to gain exactly what you need with a discussion-based format to create game-changing connections for your career. This Summit features interactive workshops and Choose Your Own Adventure sessions, a signature of Uncharted events. Start the day telling us what you need RIGHT NOW, and leave having worked on exactly that.

✨ Sessions on navigating burnout, thriving in veterinary practice, motivating your teams and team training techniques

✨ Small group discussions to cultivate connections with people who understand your role

✨ A day that will make your boss thrilled they gave you a CE budget

✨ Inspiration and a recharge to continue to make waves!

SIGN UP TODAY

December 7-9, 2023: Uncharted Practice Leaders Summit

All Upcoming Events


Episode Transcript

Stephanie Goss:

Hey everybody, I am Stephanie Goss and this is another episode of the Uncharted Podcast. This week on the podcast, Andy and I are diving back into the mailbag. We got a great letter from a technician who is concerned about one of her fellow techs. This person has been a long-time tenured employee, was previously really engaged and a rockstar on the team, and now just seems very burned out. And the technician who wrote us is really concerned about some of their behaviors and wondering when is burned out too burned out to keep on going. Let's get into this one.

Speaker 2:

And now, the Uncharted podcast.

Dr. Andy Roark:

And we are back. It's me, Dr. Andy Roark and the one and only Stephanie, the point of no return, Goss.

Stephanie Goss:

How's it going, Andy Roark?

Dr. Andy Roark:

Oh my God, Becky. Look at my summer, it is so out of control. I am on a rollercoaster that just hasn't stopped back at the station five times and I'm like, “This was fun.” And now I'm just holding on and feeling kind of beaten up.

Stephanie Goss:

I'm ready to get off.

Dr. Andy Roark:

I'm ready to… I have to go to the bathroom and I would like this rollercoaster to stop. I need everyone to stop screaming around me. I would like… stop the summer. I'm ready to get off and go back to real life. It is ready for kids to go back to school and ready. I have done all the things I wanted to do this summer, but yeah, it's been good. How about you?

Stephanie Goss:

Yeah, it's crazy right now. First of all, I miss seeing your faces, so I'm so glad that I'm staring at you right now because I haven't seen you in a week and a half because I was on vacation. But yeah, same. I had that coming down from the vacation high on Monday because I was unplugged, I spent time with my kids and I was trying really hard to not have a repeat of last summer's failures. And in fact, our friend, Eric Garcia and Tyler and I are going to do a repeat podcast about this year's challenge.

Dr. Andy Roark:

About your failure to unplug?

Stephanie Goss:

For unplugging. I did much better this year, but in my effort to do much better, I didn't look at anything until I sat down at my desk on Monday morning and then it was like, shit exploded.

Dr. Andy Roark:

And part of that was me and here's why. Because you're not the only one who hasn't seen me in a while. No one's seen me in a while. And not because I've been doing things, because everyone else has been doing things. My children are at different summer camps. My wife went on a business conference. It's just me by myself. The first thing I did was watch all the movies that I don't get to watch when other people are around, and that took about a day. I watched Renfield with Nicholas Cage as Count Dracula. I watched The Expanse, the TV show, watched a number of things and then I was kind of done. And now at this point, no one has come home, it's still just me by myself. I'm into weird shit now, Goss. I ordered a whetstone from Amazon and sharpened my kitchen knives to the point that I throw fruit in the air and cut it in half. That's how sharp my knives are right now. I bought patio furniture last night because it was Prime Day and I was like-

Stephanie Goss:

I was going to ask because it's Prime Day when we're recording this, so what did you trip over your fingers and buy?

Dr. Andy Roark:

I bought a whole set of patio furniture that my wife is going to be-

Stephanie Goss:

Surprised by.

Dr. Andy Roark:

[inaudible 00:03:46] she's going to be surprised by. I sent her a text message that says, “I made a purchase. If you hate it, we'll send it back.” And then that was the text. And then I went to bed and didn't respond to any of her follow up questions, which got increasingly frantic [inaudible 00:04:02].

Stephanie Goss:

Because she's on her business trip and she's imagining that, did he buy a car? Did he… What just happened.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah. I guarantee if you made her list the things, patio furniture wouldn't have come up. It was not a family purchase we were planning on, but I was just like, “I'm doing it. No one's here to stop me.” It's like when you leave your dog and they just chew something up and you're pretty sure it's out of spite, but you can't prove it. She's like, “I left him, and so he bought patio furniture. I think he was resentful, but I'm not sure.” Anyway. I went to a CrossFit pool party because the 4th of July party was held late, and so I went to the CrossFit pool party, which you would've really enjoyed. I love the CrossFit people that I go to the gym with, but I'm not going to lie, there was very small swimsuits and lots of posing around the pool.

Stephanie Goss:

I was going to say. I mean, I would expect no less for a CrossFit party.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah, there was-

Stephanie Goss:

I mean you like to show off your guns. I can only imagine people who are hardcore, hardcore, hardcore, hardcore CrossFitters and their amazing bodies showing up to guns out.

Dr. Andy Roark:

There was lots of drinking beverages in ways that really made your biceps stand out. A lot of that was going on, you know what I mean? There was a lot of just standing and… You know when models stand casually, it was a lot of that. But yeah, that was it. So I went to the CrossFit pool party and I was like, “Stephanie Goss would never stop giggling if she was here.”

Stephanie Goss:

Oh man, I would not. I would've been highly amused for probably 0.5 seconds and then I would've felt wildly uncomfortable and been like, “Yeah, this is not my thing. Why did I let Andy drag me to this?”

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah. I would've been like, “Come on Goss, let's go to the CrossFit pool party.”

Stephanie Goss:

I could make them all feel good about themselves because I would just be rocking my middle-aged mom bod, and just be like, “Hi.”

Dr. Andy Roark:

No, that was me. It's funny, I have a role at the CrossFit gym and it's the floor. I am the floor above which others soar. Basically that's my experience in vet school where I help make the top half of the class possible.

Stephanie Goss:

Look really good.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah. I provide the bottom part of the CrossFit experience so others can monitor their progress as they shoot past me, as I get older and older and older. All right.

Stephanie Goss:

Okay.

Dr. Andy Roark:

That's it. So that's what I've been doing.

Stephanie Goss:

Well, and not only that, so it's been busy for both of us personally and work has been insane. So came back on Monday and my desk was piled full of crap that my kids dumped there, but also like 9,000 messages and emails and everything. And so we did a thing this week. In fact, we did a thing just yesterday. We did a really big thing. And so it's been a little busy.

Dr. Andy Roark:

It has been a little busy. It's been crazy. We opened up registration for our Medical Director Summit, our Team Lead summit, our Culture Conference and our Practice Leader Summit, which is open to in-person and open to practice owners and practice managers, and so that was… We opened up all those things just yesterday and we're not done for the year. But those are the big things. So yeah, I'm super excited about this stuff.

Stephanie Goss:

There's multiple new events in there and revamping of old events that we have done before in lots of different ways. And so it has been a busy time for the team and like you said, we're not done. And so it was like, okay, we're just going to coast over the top of this hill and then we're still running, running, running because there's another hill in front of us. So it has been busy. I am very excited to see you this weekend because we are headed to AVMA.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah. AVMA in Denver.

Stephanie Goss:

I can't wait to see all of our friends and have that midsummer energy.

Dr. Andy Roark:

And you're speaking there, you're speaking on Friday at AVMA, which is the day before I get there. They moved you forward and so I will not able to see you.

Stephanie Goss:

You're going to miss it.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah.

Stephanie Goss:

But you know what? You have a history of trying to miss out on my lectures.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Not being able to get into the room because they're crazy packed is the history.

Stephanie Goss:

Well, fingers crossed that AVMA goes well. This'll come out after that, but I'm excited to see your face. I have a feeling there's going to be a lot of conversations like what we're going to talk about today there with our colleagues because it's summer, it's crazy, it's busy, and I think this… We got a message in the mail bag that kind of fits with a lot of that summer crazy for people, but also long term. We got a letter from someone that I just loved. It's from… “Concerned for her, but also for the patients”, which I thought was a great moniker for themselves. So it was someone who wrote in and said, “Hey, we have a technician on our team who has recently just seems to decide that she just doesn't give a crap anymore. She's very polite to pet owners and other team members when they talk to her and interact directly. But she just doesn't seem to be trying and she's not doing things, she's making mistakes and she doesn't seem to not be trying to not make mistakes.”

So they gave some examples, recently sent home a patient that had been dropped off without all of the vaccines that they came in for. And when someone brought it up and they were talking to her, she just kind of was like, “Whatever.” And this is a team member who previously had a ton of hustle and heart and cared and the team is worried, this person included, because it seems like this tech is just super, super zoned out. And the person who wrote into us is also a fellow technician. When they tried to talk to her one-on-one, the response was kind of just like, “Hey, it's just a job. The fact that I'm making more mistakes…” it didn't seem to bother her.

And this technician who wrote us was really concerned because they were like, “Look, I know we've been shorthanded. Everybody is burnt out.” It's summer, it's busy, we're shorthanded, but at what point does it get to the point of no return? At what point does it get to burned out being too burned out to be allowed to keep going because this tech is concerned for her fellow tech but also for the patients. And I just thought this was a fun one for us to talk through.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah, it is. This is a good one. I see this a lot. Boy, it's really sad. What breaks my heart the most is when you were working with somebody and they love their job and they were really into it and then they are not in love with it anymore. And the thing that breaks my heart is one, clearly something has happened in this person's life and that has taken their joy away. And that's just frankly really, really sad. The other thing is that it's worse to have someone who really loved their job and did a great job and then just ends up quiet quitting, than it is to have someone who was never good at the job or never really loved it because you know how happy they were or they could be.

And it's almost like I'd rather not know that they could be so happy because then it doesn't make it so stark when you look at them and go, “God, that you're really in a very, very different place.” And I'm not serious about it, about wishing to not have seen them happy, but you get the point. It really is that dichotomy is really significant. You have something to compare to. You can compare where they are now to where they have been in the past and it's really hard.

Stephanie Goss:

Right. I think subconsciously you know the difference and you can see it. And so the subconscious expectation on your part is if they had previously been at 100 and you've seen them at that point, you subconsciously have that expectation, and so it makes it all the more stark when it drops off. We all have good days and bad days and we all have days where maybe we generally perform at 100% or 110%, but then we have days that are crappy days. That's easy. But when it falls into that pattern, subconsciously, we can't help but judge how different it is now compared to how it was previously.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Oh, totally. I mean everything. The way we're wired is about comparison. I think that's why we pick up on that a lot. A lot of times there's people who are you've… I mean you've seen people who are happy, happy bouncy people and then one day they're not and you go, “Oh my gosh, are you okay?”

Stephanie Goss:

Yeah.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Versus other people that are not happy, happy bouncy people and they might behave the exact same way and you wouldn't think twice about it, it's just who they are.

Stephanie Goss:

I'm laughing because I'm actually thinking about you and me, you and I have had this conversation because I am one of those happy people.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yes.

Stephanie Goss:

Shocking I think to everybody who's listening to the podcast right now that I could be bubbly and happy and outgoing. And I recall several occasions where you called me and you were just like, “Hey, I love you. And what is happening with your face, because you're normally so happy and upbeat?” And when we have a team meeting or we're working on something and other people can see you and you're not yourself, it is that stark noticeable difference and it impacts everyone. You were teasing me when you're like, “Hey, what's up with your face?” But really it is that stark difference when you have somebody who is so quiet and I mean, so crazy and loud and outgoing and then they're suddenly very quiet. I have gotten that at multiple times in my life as an extrovert, as an outgoing person.

Dr. Andy Roark:

I remember those conversations. I think I remember using the term poopy pants, but it was. But I say it to you, I was like, “This is not fair.” But the fact that you were known for being so bubbly and happy means that when you show up and you're not, people are like, “What's wrong with Stephanie?” versus other people show up and they're just not bubbly and happy because that's just how they are, and no one bats an eye. And I'm not saying you shouldn't be your authentic self, but it is just something to be aware of that people pay attention to who you are and they look for deviations from the mean.

It's funny, it's why we'll put up with jerks sometimes because they're always jerks. But if someone's nice and then they come in and they be a jerk, you're like, “This is a big deal.” But the person who's just always a jerk, you just learn to ignore them because you're like, “That's how they are and I'm just going to ignore them.” And you could write them off. But it's just interesting that contrast from expected norms is what hammers points home for a lot of people, so anyway. That's just what I was saying when I say I was particularly sad. But let's get into talking about this. You ready?

Stephanie Goss:

Okay. Yeah, let's do it.

Dr. Andy Roark:

All right, cool. Sweet. Let's start with some head space. The big thing that I want to start with is this, I think one of the healthiest things that we can do in our lives is develop the habit of separating people from their behaviors and saying… Instead of being like, “This person is toxic,” or, “This person is a jerk,” or, “This person is whatever.” The person is the person and they are exhibiting behaviors and the behavior does not define the individual. My friend is not a jerk. My friend, he is exhibiting jerky behavior, but that's different from being a jerk. And I just think it immediately makes people easier to get along with and to like, and everything doesn't feel so final. If you're exhibiting jerky behavior, then you can stop exhibiting jerky behavior and that will be over. But if you are a jerk, then becoming not a jerk is a long process and much more challenging than just, “Hey, stop doing the behavior that is bothering people.” You know what I mean?

Stephanie Goss:

Yeah, I do. I do.

Dr. Andy Roark:

And so when we start talking about this person who's burned out, I think it's… One of the immediate head space things that I would do is I would walk back the label, this person's burned out. I would say, “This person is exhibiting signs of burnout. They are exhibiting behaviors that make me worry about patient safety. They are showing a lack of engagement.” But it doesn't make me feel like I'm judging this person as an individual. And that's going to become important when you see where we're going. Do you agree with that?

Stephanie Goss:

Yeah, absolutely. And I think your point is spot on because when we get into the actual conversation and this tech who wrote us has already experienced that, they had the conversation, they pointed it out and said, “I'm worried because you're making too many mistakes,” it's very… The difference between feeling like someone is calling you a jerk or someone is telling you that you're burned out versus what you said, which is, “Hey, here's an example of behavior that makes me concerned for you. I'm concerned you're exhibiting some signs of burnout. Where are you at?” The way that someone can receive that is very, those two things are very starkly different.

If somebody comes to me and tells me, “Hey, you're a jerk,” I'm going to immediately go on the offense, and I'm going to either get to… I mean they're going to go defensive and be like, “No, I'm not.” Or I'm going to attack back because I feel attacked. Whereas if somebody says to me, “Hey, that thing you just said, you sounded like a total a-hole, maybe think about that.” There is just something very different in that approach to be able to be like, “Oh.” And without even thinking, I pause and think and rewind what I did instead of immediately trying to defend myself or attack back at the person.

Dr. Andy Roark:

There's a reason I put this in head space too is because you're right, one, for having the actual conversation, talking to the person about their behavior instead of about who they are or what they're being, yes, significantly easier, significantly more productive, significantly easier to coach and give feedback to, all those things true. However, I would stress that for me, not only does it make the actual conversation easier, it is an important part of head space. And the reason it's important part of head space is this, what I'm getting ready to say right now, you can care about someone and also decide not to be in a toxic relationship with that person. But you can only do that if you can separate the person and the behavior. Otherwise you're like, “Oh, there's this person and I'm tied to them and they're behaving this way,” and it's blah.

No, I love this person. I care about this person, and as long as this person exhibits this behavior that is unacceptable, I am not going to be present around that person. It doesn't mean I don't care about them, it doesn't mean I don't wish the best for them. It just means they're doing a behavior that I can't be around or it does not work for me to have an active ongoing relationship with that person. But for me I can't… I've never been able to do that until I can separate the person and the behaviors because then I can say, “I really care about Stephanie Goss and until she stops yelling at the staff, she can't come to the staff meetings. I think the world of her, she cannot be on our team because she cannot get along with this one person and it causes damage to our team. I think she's great.”

Stephanie Goss:

I'm a total tyrant.

Dr. Andy Roark:

I mean, I'm completely making up things in case that wasn't obvious.

Stephanie Goss:

I'm teasing.

Dr. Andy Roark:

But you see what I'm saying though, right?

Stephanie Goss:

Yeah, for sure, for sure.

Dr. Andy Roark:

But yeah, you've got to separate the person from the behavior and then you have to coach the behavior. You have to give feedback to the behavior. You have to hold people accountable for their behavior. None of those things mean that you don't care about that person. And if you can make that split, now we're immediately in a head space where we can start to effectively manage this person who we like and who we're worried about. And also we're going to hold this person accountable. I can't do that until I make that tactical move of separating the person and the behavior and I send my love to the person and I manage the behavior. And that might be this person is going to be managed out of the practice. I don't want that, but I manage the behavior. And if that's where it goes, because the behavior doesn't stop and it's toxic and it's damaging and it's putting patients at risk, I am going to manage that behavior possibly out of our practice. And it's not going to change my feelings about the person who is exhibiting those behaviors.

Stephanie Goss:

And the thing that I would add to that is I'm sure that there are people listening, even me listening to you, I'm thinking in my head about situations that I have been in where I have had someone who is exhibiting behavior that I don't like. This is really freaking hard. Separating the behavior from the person is really, really hard work. And so if you're sitting here and you're listening to us and you're just like, “Oh, Andy makes it sound so easy.” It's not.

Dr. Andy Roark:

No.

Stephanie Goss:

It's really hard.

Dr. Andy Roark:

No, it's not.

Stephanie Goss:

It's hard for both of us too. And I think that a big part of it for me is if you're that person who's like, “This is really, really hard.” When we get to the what do we do about it piece of it, I think that it's important to recognize that before you tackle the actual action steps, your work might begin in the head space piece and you may have to do some work, whether that is writing out how you feel, whether it's talking it out with an outside perspective person, whether it's a professional like a therapist or someone who doesn't work with your team and getting some outside perspective on it. There is actual work for all of us that has to be done there every time even if the work… For some of us, the work is like, I'm going to work through these things. And it's a relatively short process.

And there have been times in my life where I have had to work through this for someone very close to me. And that head space work was long and painful and hard. And it took me quite a while before I got to the place where I could be like you were saying Andy, “Here is the person, here is their behaviors.” And now I feel like I can move into the action space where I'm starting to have the conversations or I'm doing something about it. I think it's just worth mentioning because a lot of times I know I'll listen to people talk or I'll be at a conference, I'll be in a lecture or I'll be listening to a podcast and I'm like, oh, it sounds so nice and pretty and easy when they talk about it. And I think that's something you and I both still struggle with. And it is work. It will always be work.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Oh, sure. It's always going to be work. It's always going to be easier to say, “I can't stand that person,” than to say this person exhibits behaviors that I can't stay in. But I'll tell you one of those things is much easier to fix than the other.

Stephanie Goss:

Yeah, for sure.

Dr. Andy Roark:

So that's the first thing. The second thing for head space is remember that management is balancing needs. And we talk about this whenever we talk about people who are having mental health struggles in the practice or people who have outside life challenges that they're bringing. [inaudible 00:23:42] bring their personal life into practice always end up talking about this, but management is about balancing needs, which means you can care about this person. And also it is the responsibility of management to care about that person and to care about the other staff members and team members who are going to have to pick up the slack for this person who's not doing what they're supposed to do. And we have to balance the needs of the pet owners who do not feel like they're getting the service or the attention that they need or they're frustrated because they have to come back because their pet didn't get the services they were dropped off to get.

And we have to balance the needs of the pet that did not get the level of care that it needed to get. And so, I like that perspective a lot because it makes hard decisions a lot easier for me. If I look at one person, I get totally focused on that person and I'm like, “What do I do about this person? What do they need?” I don't know that. I know they're struggling. I know they're having this hard time. Then I can really get bogged down in, “Is it the kindest thing to let this person go? Do I give them another chance? What do you think?” Zooming out and looking at everyone's needs and how they're being affected generally makes the decisions easier. It also makes the conversation much easier because I can go to this person without judgment and ultimately say, “Hey, I'm concerned about this aspect of patient care. I'm concerned about the client experience. I'm concerned about the other team having to pick up the slack because of these behaviors.” Full stop. “I need these behaviors to end in order for us to keep working together.”

Stephanie Goss:

Yeah. Well, and I need your help too, because…

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yes.

Stephanie Goss:

I think about it from a management perspective and my inclination, there were times where I had hard conversations with my team, and I hate to say it this way, but it felt a lot of times, like I was having a conversation with one of my kids and I have two, and they're very close in age, and one of them, the conversation always tends to go back to, “Well, you didn't make them do that. You treated them differently.” And so a lot of time in the practice I would have a conversation that's like, “Well, why did you take the side of the client?” I didn't take the side of the client. I balanced in the moment and said, “Look, this pet needs to be taken care of. They were dropped off. We didn't do our job, so I'm going to make sure that we do our job, we take care of the patient, we take care of the client.” And that may feel like I am taking their side and I'm getting that.

Really what I'm doing from a manager perspective, to your point, Andy, is balancing that. Because now if I take the weight of taking care of the patient and the client off the scale, now I can look at the rest of it and I can sit down with you and I can have that conversation and say, “Hey, this isn't like you. This was the consequence, this was the conversation I had to have with the client. I had to give them their money back or I had to have… And yes, I'm worried about that, but I'm more worried about you because this is not like you. What's going on and how can I help support you?” Because to your point, this is very uncharacteristic and I can't or it can't continue, but really it's about how do I support you as a person, because then you're only weighing that person and the rest of the team. And so now instead of balancing four things, I've dealt with the client and the patient and now I'm dealing with the team and this one individual, which makes that balancing a little bit easier, I think.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah, I do agree. I think part of it for me is a math problem, and I hate to… And this isn't intentionally taking the emotion out of it. You know what I mean? I don't tend to forget the human aspect, that comes very naturally to me. And so I have to work more to take the human aspect out so I can make clear-headed decisions, and so a lot of… This is a math problem because people will come to you and they'll say, “What is…” The question that was asked was, what is the point of no return? And I will say to you, “That my friend is a math problem. Add up the damages to the pet, to the pet owner, the client experience, to the doctors that are delegating the damage to their trust, the damage to the team that's having to make up for mistakes or things that are not getting done and the frustration that you feel and having to manage this and the amount of time you are putting into cleaning up this mess.”

Put that against the convenience of keeping this person, giving them time to work and figure out what the math says. And really, a lot of things really depend on what the collateral is. If the person is not making very many mistakes, and it's a once in a blue moon sort of thing, we're going to keep talking with this person and coaching this person. If they're making serious mistakes and life-threatening mistakes for our patients, that's going to be wildly different equation when we look at it. Anyway, but that's it. The whole part, I guess my first part of head space is separating the person from the behavior allows me to look more clearly at what is happening. And then the whole balance approach lets me look at all of the moving parts and pieces together in sort of a non-emotional way.

So that's where I would start. I think once you do that, then you can go into the human side and you know what the battle battlefield looks like, you know what what's happening, what the consequences of these behaviors are, what the behaviors are themselves, you know all those things. And so you can go and talk to the person and say, “Hey, I'm concerned about you. What's going on?” Is a big one. Start from point of being curious. This is just classic root cause analysis in performance evaluation is what's going on? How are you doing? Where's your head at? I couldn't help but notice these things. How are you feeling? What's going on with you? And just asking the questions. And so we start with those things and a lot of times we can come and we can talk about the behaviors and the person may have a very justifiable reason for feeling the way that they feel. And you can say the way you feel is justified and I hear it and we are working on it, and at the same time, these behaviors cannot continue, full stop.

And now I feel like to me that is a place I'm very comfortable in working because I have done the things empathetically of understanding this person, hearing where they're coming from, and I have also communicated what the obstacles look like going forward. And now I feel like I'm in a good head space to navigate this, what are their needs? What are our needs? Let's see if we can work out arrangement and we'll have to see how it goes and maybe we can get this person back on track and we can help support them and we can bring them through and out the other side. And I've definitely seen that and I've seen people re-engage, maybe they're spiraling downward and they're going to continue to spiral downward and we're going to have to be conscientious and we're going to have to set expectations and set boundaries for ourselves and our practice about what we'll put up with and what we'll tolerate and what's acceptable and what's not.

And then we're going to have to let the chips fall where they may. One of my favorite sayings just to remember is there's three things you can't control, the past, the future and other people. And so you can't make this person do anything. All you can do is be kind and supportive and clear about what your boundaries are and what is required in order to continue to be on your team.

Stephanie Goss:

Anything else? I like that. Anything else from a head space perspective for you?

Dr. Andy Roark:

No. I think that those are the big things for me and just getting my head straight about this is… Yeah. Oftentimes I'm so empathetic of people and I really want them to succeed and I'm such a cheerleader, I have to go through those. So if you're hearing these steps and you're like, “Man, Andy's getting pretty pragmatic pretty fast,” and I go, yeah, my nature to care a lot about people and to want to help and support people, and so I have to actively engage head space. For me, it has to be on the other side, which is going to be like where is the point of no return? I need to try to get some clarity on that so I can coach to it.

Stephanie Goss:

Yeah. And I agree with you. I have had to do a lot of work to do the first step that we talked about, which was caring about the person and separating them from the toxic relationship. Separating from a toxic relationship or separating them from their behavior, that's what a lot of work in recovery is about. I've done a lot of that work, so that piece comes easier for me. I would say for me, the head space work is that balancing piece. And so I think that it's about separating the behavior from the person, figuring out how you're going to balance the things.

And then I love your last point about knowing what you can control and what you can't and getting to that space where then you are like, “Now that I've worked through all of this, now I'm ready to figure out what do I do here?” Which is I think the whole point of the email they were asking what is the point of no return? But also for me, the unasked question is then what do you do about it? This is about a personal thing. And so how do you deal with that? Do you want to take a break right here and then come back and talk about the what do we about it part?

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah, let's do it. Okay.

Stephanie Goss:

Hey gang, I want to make sure that if you are in the role of medical director that you hear this. Andy and I talked on the episode about our Medical Director Summit and I wanted to make sure that you knew where to go to sign up because we want to see you there. Whether you're in private practice or you're in corporate practice, the position of medical director is a unique one. You have the challenge of balancing the medicine and quality for your hospital along with usually some management responsibilities and partnering with a practice manager to run the hospital efficiently, effectively, and in true partnership. And so we decided after working over this last three years with hundreds of multi-site medical directors and practice leaders, that we wanted to do a summit just for our medical directors. So we have something coming up in September. It is happening September 27th.

It is a one-day virtual summit and it is going to be awesome. We've got some workshops from people who are in medical director roles, both in private practice and corporate practice, and we are bringing people together across the industry. It doesn't matter what hospital you work for, you've got commonality. We're bringing you all together and building a community where you can share the highs and the lows of being a medical director with your peers. So head over to unchartedvet.com/events and you can see the signup link for the Medical Director Summit. Again, it's happening in September and we would love to see you there.

Dr. Andy Roark:

All right. Let's come back and start to talk about how we actually set this up. The first action step for me always is our safe conversations that we use all the time.

Stephanie Goss:

Sure.

Dr. Andy Roark:

So safe, S-A-F-E, S is can you sit next to this person? Can you smile at this person? If they have done something that has made you furious, if you just had to clean up a big mess and an angry client and you're triggered and you're mad at them, that's not the time to have the conversation. We might have to put a pin in this until you can sit next to that person and you can smile at that person because being triggered and being angry is a terrible way to start this conversation. A is assume good intent. Assume this person is trying their best. Don't assume that they don't care and they don't want to be here and they hate this place and they hate you and blah, blah, blah.

That's assuming the worst intent. It's really easy with someone like this, especially someone who's burned out to say they don't give a crap, they think it's just a job because they're telling you it's just a job. It's really easy to assume that they're lazy, they're trying to take advantage of the system, they don't really care about the patients, things like that. It's better to assume that this person is really struggling.

Stephanie Goss:

And don't assume that they're burned out, would be the other assume that I would say here, to your point earlier, which is don't confuse the person and the behavior. You've got to force yourself to be in that place. And if you can't separate that and you can't look at it like, this person is burned out. If you can't have the conversation and assume the intention thereof, I'm worried about the behaviors, you're not ready to have the conversation, I would say either.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah, I think that's fair. I think that's a good point. So assume good intent or assume noble intent. F is has this person been set up to fail? What here is my fault? Have we given this person opportunities to get help or do we have things in place that can be resources for someone who is starting to, say burnout? Let's just say, if that's what's happening. Have we been working shorthanded, it sounds like? Yeah, this person in some way, they kind of have been set up to fail. We know that everybody's been really busy. One of the things I would do is make sure when I go and talk to this person, I'm not going to go, “Hey, look, your behavior is not where it needs to be.” I think what I can say is, “Hey, I understand we have been really, really busy and I think everybody is struggling a bit under the workload.”

And I think by owning that as a leader, I can help take some of the pressure off this person's shoulders and hopefully help them feel less defensive. A lot of times when you go in and say, “Hey, I want to talk to you about your behavior,” the person immediately gets defensive. When I go in and say, “Hey, I understand the situations that we've been working in are not ideal. I get it. And I know that we have been shorthanded for a long time and everybody is tired and I understand all of that.” And that just as a nice opening hopefully lowers the chances of the person going immediately super defensive and shutting the conversation down.

Stephanie Goss:

Yeah, for sure. And I think that that's it, that's a piece. It's hard as a manager and as a leader sometimes to look at that because it feels like by acknowledging that you're saying that you couldn't do your job and that can feel really, really personal. And there have been times where I have been having a conversation with someone and I feel myself starting to defend the thing and focus on their behavior because that is a really hard thing to say, but if you… I think you are so spot on that if you can say, “Hey, the schedule sucks. I realize that I am not… I am doing the schedule as best I can and I'm still short three people, and so you are working shorthanded with three less technicians. I recognize that. I know that I can control that, and I am trying really hard and it's still doesn't change the fact that I see you and I see what you guys are all working through.”

That just puts someone in a very, very different place. If there's one skill that I learned to master or that I hope to master as a manager, but that I use, it's that, because let me tell you guys the difference that it makes for people in starting with vulnerability and being honest. It just changes someone's demeanor when you start there versus, “Hey, you're doing this thing and we've got to talk about this thing that you're doing.” It just takes away that attacking feeling, I feel like in so many instances.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah. I completely agree with that. And then E in safe is the end result. What is the end result you want? I would caution you against the end result, I want this person's behavior to be 100% changed and them to be their old self. I don't think that that is a reasonable end result for a conversation. The end result for me is I would like to have a clear understanding of what is going on that has caused this person's behavior to change. I would like them to understand my concerns and my needs, and then I would like to leave with ideas that I can implement that might support them, and understand how I can try to help them get back on track. That's it. And you'll say, “But Andy, you haven't actually affected the behavior.” And I would say, “No.” My first conversation is going to be an expectation communication, understanding conversation, and we're going to start to talk about what we need and then based on what is said, we'll figure out how to go from there.

Stephanie Goss:

Yeah. For me, that end result always is, I want to leave the conversation with a plan and I am 110000% okay with deciding the plan at the end of that conversation because I might go into the conversation thinking this is going to be a disciplinary conversation and I might let this person go, but what if, hallucinate with me for a second, what if I ask them what's going on and they share information that radically changes what I was thinking? I want to be okay to say, “Oh, I'm going to throw that plan out the window and now I'm going to make up a new plan.” But I think that as a leader, one of the areas where we can let our people down, to your point, making sure that they have access to the resources is hugely, hugely important because it's not our job to be mental health professionals.

It's not our job to get into their personal lives and support them. And so I think part of that action step is if you're getting information from them that there is stuff going on in their personal life, you need to support them and have resources available to separate yourself from that. And I think the E should always be, what is the plan? What is the next step? When are we going to circle back to this conversation? Because 98% of the time I would say these are not one and done conversations. Occasionally, yeah, maybe it is a one and done, it was a fluke thing, but most of the time you're sitting down because there's a pattern and there has to be some sort of follow up. And we have to be able to tell the people on our team as leaders and as managers what that follow-up plan is going to be and then actually execute on that plan.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah. I'm really glad you added that. That absolutely needs to be part of the end result is where do we go from here? When will we meet back again? How are we going to measure success? I think that's exactly right. That was my point when saying, what's the end result? And this is going to be a multi-step process. Anytime you have multi-step process, you need to have clarity about what the next step is when we're getting back together. So I love that. All right. So the first one for me is safe. The second one for me is how you set yourself up. And I think a lot of people who are managers go into these conversations and they are like, “I am the law and you are going to have to meet my needs and demands.” And they don't say it that way necessarily, but in their mind they are like, “I am the enforcer of the rules. I am the one who is going to make you do the… I'm going to make you behave.”

Stephanie Goss:

They're going in with the stick of accountability.

Dr. Andy Roark:

They're going in with the stick. Exactly.

Stephanie Goss:

They're going to whack you.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yes. All right. So you can do that. But there's another way to do it that I think is really important. And I really think this is a huge differentiator between fairly inexperienced managers and much more advanced managers. And it's where you position yourself on the playing board, on the playing field. The 4th of July, I go to this cookout and these are my wife's friends, so my wife is amazing, just so you know, my wife is, and you know this, Steph, but my wife is a amazing.

Stephanie Goss:

I do.

Dr. Andy Roark:

And she is so brilliant. I mean so much smarter than me. So much smarter. She's a college professor, she's a total badass. She does Olympic weightlifting as a hobby. She's freaking amazing. So she's badass. Anyway, so we go to the same 4th of July party every summer and one of our work colleagues puts it on. And so we're there and the husband of the work colleague comes up to me and he says, “Hey, I'd like to ask for some parenting advice from you.” Me? Alison's there. He does not ask Allison, he asked me, “Andy, I would like some parenting advice from you.” And I was like, okay. If you want to make my head swell, ask me for advice. I'm like, “No one…”

Stephanie Goss:

“I would love to give you advice.”

Dr. Andy Roark:

Exactly. No one has ever been like, “Andy Roark, talk to me about parenting.” That's never happened to me. If you want to talk to me about knife sharpening, I'm the guy right now. I got it. I've been practicing for a day straight and I have sharpened every knife I can find. I am raring to go, parenting, not so much, but anyway. So he says to me, he's like, “In our house, my husband sets the gold standard. Nothing gets done part way.” And this is why I never miss 4th of July is because everything at their gathering is just so, it is the food is amazing. The garden is weeded, the shade umbrellas are set up just so. There's lovely outdoor patio furniture, not as nice as mine when it gets here, but real good. Anyway, I might have gotten inspired by their cookout. Anyway. So he says, “Our son…” So their son is probably five.

He has recognized that one parent sets the bar real high in everything and the other parent doesn't set it as high. And what is so funny is this person was like, “Who else has a family like this?” And he looked right at Andy Roark like that's a guy who does not set the bar as high as his partner does, and totally nailed it. I was like, “I see why you walked through a room of highly intelligent, accomplished people and came directly to me.” It's like, “You look like a man who does not push for excellence the way your spouse does.”

Stephanie Goss:

It must be because he knows that you have a bad dog.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Oh, 100%. So anyway, he was like-

Stephanie Goss:

Not because you're not a good parent.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Well, Finn is like, “Hey, I'm done cleaning my room.” And Michael, it's his name. Michael has to say, “Well, you know this is not going to fly. This is not going to fly.” And so he's like, “I don't want to undermine my spouse. I don't want to roll my eyes and say, I think this is ridiculous that you have to get your room this clean. I want to be supportive of my spouse and also my kid 100% sees what's going on and knows that I would not clean the room to the level that he's being required to clean the room to.” And so I thought about for a second, and I just started talking as I do. And I was like, “All right. How familiar are you with the Hunger Games?” And he was like, “Oh, I know all about the Hunger Games.” Bear with me, I promise this is going somewhere.

The Hunger Games, I was like, “Okay. Remember the coach in the Hunger Games, Haymitch?” And he was like, “Yes, I remember Haymitch.” I was like, “Haymitch wanted the contenders to succeed.” They were his charges and he was their mentor. He wasn't their friend, he was their mentor. And was he also, he couldn't control the Hunger Games and he was respectful of it. It was like, “Hey, I love you, but…”

Stephanie Goss:

You might die.

Dr. Andy Roark:

“… this is what the deal is in the Hunger Games. I'm here to help you be successful given that this is how the world is.” That's the role I'm talking about in management. I know there's a long way to go, but instead of being like, “I am the law, you are going to do what I say because I'm holding a stick,” I see myself more as Haymitch who says, “Look, these are the rules of the Hunger Games and I'm rooting for you, and I want you to be successful, and I'm going to be your biggest cheerleader.” And so that's what I'm talking about, about putting yourself in a different position. If you go into this and you're like, “Look, I'm sorry, but I am the law and you will do what I tell you or else you'll be gone,” that's just fundamentally a terrible place to be. And no one means to be in that place, but they don't think there's an alternative and there is an alternative.

The alternative is to say, “Hey, this is what is required for our teams to feel safe, for our patients to be safe, for our pet owners to be happy and coming back for us to live up to our values. This is what is required. And I am here to support you in achieving those goals, those requirements. How can I help you get there and how fast can we get there because we cannot continue on not meeting these requirements, but I'm here for you.” And so anyway, I know that's a long weird story to get to, but it was in my mind recently, it just really crystallized the idea of, you don't have to be the law to respect the law and to say… And again, when I was giving parenting advice, I was like, “Honor your spouse. Be supportive of your spouse and also just don't BS like, “No, I would totally make you do this.” This is what it's going to be required and it's going to be required. And I am not going to undermine,” just like the manager.

I'm not going to be like, “Look, honestly, this is what the practice really requires, but I'm going to let you just…”

Stephanie Goss:

Look the other way.

Dr. Andy Roark:

“Yeah, I'm going to let you get off. No, that's not an option. I'm going to support you and I will help you in meeting the standards. And that's who I am as a leader.” So I'm communicating the standards to you and then I'm helping you to cheerlead to get there. So anyway, I know that was one of the weirdest examples I've probably given in a while, but you don't have to be the law. You can be Haymitch who is cheering and coaching and guiding someone to meet the harsh expectations that are reality. And if they fall short, then they still fall short. And you can say, “I'm sorry, we can't continue on,” but it's not make me happy or else.

Stephanie Goss:

I love that you told that story because I think that is definitely a piece of the management puzzle is that, look, ultimately maybe this person is exhibiting behaviors that are unacceptable and maybe that can't continue. And if I don't look at the F in safe and I don't look at how I set them up to fail, if I don't feel like I have been their cheerleader, I have supported them, and I have done all of the things that are within my power to do to help, then I will… If I have to let them go, I will struggle with that and I will feel bad. And I will tell you the times that I have felt bad letting somebody go, it's because I damn well knew that I didn't do my job good enough. And if I feel like I have done my job and I have supported them and I have been their cheerleader and I have been clear about the expectations and I've done all of the things, I still feel bad because I know that it's impacting someone's life on a human level.

But I don't feel bad letting them go because I have done my part. And I think your point about the Hunger Games is a true one because if you've done your role as a mentor and you have given them all of the tools and they die like that, you've got to live with that. You've got to be able to sleep at night. And so for me as a manager, that's the way that I sleep at night is to say, “Look, here are the requirements and I'm going to cheerlead you. I'm going to give you the resources. I'm going to do all the things.” But at the end of the day, to your point in the head space, I can't change the person. I can't control other people. You have to do the work. And if you don't do the work, I don't own that. And so I think that that's a really, really important part in the action step perspective because it really helps, I don't know, it helps me sleep at night.

Dr. Andy Roark:

And I completely agree with that 100%. And I agree also about being okay with it because I always wanted to be okay with this because, again, I can't control the people, which means I have to be okay if this doesn't work out. And that whole laying down the expectations, helping coach, that's a big part of it. The other thing that I messed up the most early in my career, and honestly it's probably the most common way I see people mess up, is they don't start early in enough. They wait until the behavior's become so bad you can't ignore them, and then they intervene. That's when I have felt bad before because I'll be like, “Hey, look, you've got three weeks to make a significant impact on your behavior.”

Stephanie Goss:

Right. Because the team is ready to mutiny.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Because the team is done. They are about to mutiny. And then that is a thing where I dropped the ball because I saw the behaviors. I just didn't say anything. And if I had intervened six weeks earlier, I could have… I don't know if I could save the person, but I could have probably… First of all, it's a whole lot easier to change behaviors before they get ingrained and become habits. And so I could have done a lot more if I had intervened early. So that's another one for me is start early. Too many people wait until things just can't be salvaged. The team's about the mutiny, there's high pressure and the whole thing is just too late to save.

Stephanie Goss:

Yeah.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Stay on task. When you start to talk to someone, especially if they have other things going on in their personal life, it's really easy to get drawn into what's going on with them. Don't let yourself be drawn in. You can be empathetic without drifting off task. Stick to what is required here at the clinic, what the impacts at the clinic are, what it is when we're here at work. And then you can provide resources for people. Like I said, we talked about employee assistance programs, things like that. You can be sympathetic to the person, but avoid being drawn into helping them fix their personal outside of work problems. That's just not your domain or your purview.

Stephanie Goss:

And I love that you said that because I don't know from this email if this person is a coworker, a peer of this technician, if they're a team lead and they're somewhat responsible for this person's behavior as a fellow technician or if they're a practice manager or some combination of all of those things. And I think knowing your relationship to that person and knowing how to stay on task because it's so easy to get drawn in as a peer to other people's. Easy across the board, especially if you're a peer to that person, likewise, know when to ask for help. So for me, the saying on task has to do with, have the conversation and have it in the context of your relationship with this person.

So if you're a peer, oh my gosh, go to this person and say, “Hey, I'm worried about you. I care about you as a coworker. What's going on?” And if you're getting information back that you can't do anything with and you're like, “Oh, this person needs resources,” and that's not your job, that's when you have the conversation with your team lead or your practice manager and just say, “Hey, I know someone on our team is struggling. Are there resources that are available for us as a team?” If you know what the resources are, sharing them yourself obviously, but also recognizing what is the context of your role here and not being afraid to ask for help for the conversations, that will help it stay on task here, because maybe you do need.

Maybe you are a team lead and maybe you've been struggling with this person because it is your responsibility, but look, if it's becoming a pattern of behavior, to your point about don't wait too long, the practice manager needs to be involved in that before it's to the point of like, “Okay, I've given this person 19 write-ups and now I would like to fire them.” No, no, no, no. Your practice manager needs to know when you're starting to have those conversations. “Hey, just a heads-up, this is a thing that's going on. I wanted to just put it on your radar.” Because then it makes the ask for help when you need to actually deal with the situation that much easier.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah. Well, if you're a team lead, you know the first thing you need to do.

Stephanie Goss:

What?

Dr. Andy Roark:

Is sign up for the Uncharted Team Lead Summit on November the 8th. It's a one-day virtual event. It's only for team leads. There's nothing else out there to help team leads deal with this exact type of stuff and we're on it. So anyway, I know where you could find that, it's unchartedvet.com, team lead summit. I'd love to see you there. If you are the team lead, if you are the manager, if you are the peer, and this is so simple, but it gets overlooked a lot, lean into positive reinforcement. If somebody's tired and they're like, it's just a job and they've lost their passion for the job, one of the things that you can do that, A, helps correct the behavior and, B, helps respark their passion is give them-

Stephanie Goss:

Pull out the good things.

Dr. Andy Roark:

… positive feedback, catch them when they are doing a good job and just say, “Hey, thank you. That meant a lot to me. “Hey, I saw you do that thing. Man, you were amazing with that case.” “Hey, you were such a huge help for me. I just wanted to tell you how much I appreciate your help.” And you'll say, “But that's not fixing the negative things they're doing.” And I go, “Nope, it's not.” But we all know how training works. If we positively reinforce behaviors, I don't care who you are, you can be trained if we positively reinforce behaviors, we can cause those behaviors to happen more frequently. And the other thing is, everybody loves to feel appreciated. Everybody likes to be recognized. It does not mean… And again, here's the other thing, some people are like, “But if they're making mistakes, I can't positively reinforce them.” And I go, “I don't know. Let's think about training that you and I know and have seen.”

Do we not give positive reinforcement to a dog that we're trying to train if they have a mistake somewhere? No. We immediately set them back up to succeed and praise their successes. And again, I've said this a million times in case you haven't heard me say it. When I talk about training dogs, look, we are all simple animals. I don't care who you are. I don't care how many degrees you have, I don't care what your role is, you're a simple animal. And so when I talk about this, parallels between training dogs and people, I don't care who the person is, this is how mammal training works. It just is.

Stephanie Goss:

I love that.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Just making that clear.

Stephanie Goss:

I love that.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Cool. We're going to wrap up here real quick. I think you already hit on the big ones. If you're management, one-on-one meetings are your friend. Let's set a cadence. Let's get back in. Let's do check-in meetings so I can continue to support you and see how things are going. That's it. Pick your metrics. How are we going to measure success? What are the things that we're looking on? You don't need metrics as far as, I want to see your customer satisfaction scores, blah, blah, blah. I want to try to give clear examples of what I'm looking at and what I care about and how I'm going to measure success so that me and the person are both looking at the same things. I want to avoid the thing where they come in and go, “Man, did you see how I turned it around last week? I was amazing. Man, I did all the things right.”

And you're like, “Actually, the three things that I care the most about you did again, and I am wildly unhappy with you.” That is such a hard thing when they think they did good and you think that they didn't do good, and you have to tell them that, heartbreaking. And so just try to get that clarity. But again, that one-on-one, doesn't have to be a ton of time. It can be a five-minute check in, but set that cadence, put it on the calendar because otherwise you know it's not going to actually happen. Put it on the calendar, make sure it happens. Lock eyes. Talk about what we're doing, remember to lead into the positive reinforcement. A lot of these people, the fastest way to turn them around is to celebrate them. And that may not seem like it's true, I promise you it is.

Stephanie Goss:

I love it. I love it so much.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Cool.

Stephanie Goss:

Okay. I think that's all I've got except go sign up for the events that we've got coming.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Exactly. Right.

Stephanie Goss:

That's the ending of this episode.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Yeah. Head over to unchartedvet.com. We'll put a link down the show notes. Like I said, virtual Medical Director Summit. Again, there's not a lot of leadership training, there's not a lot of support from medical directors. If you are a regional medical director, you're a medical director over a… If you're a doctor and you oversee multiple hospitals, this is the best thing I think you are going to find for your role. I think you have a lot to add here. We've worked with literally hundreds of multi-site veterinary medical directors. We have done so much of that in the last couple of years. I think we got something really special for you, so come and check it out. Anyway, that's all I got.

Stephanie Goss:

Yeah, I love it. And if you're a peer and you're listening to this, good for you. I mean, good for you if you're a manager or a team lead, but especially if it's a peer who was writing this, good for you for recognizing it and asking the question. And this is what Culture Conference is all about. We're going to talk about all of that there. So there's something for everybody. You can head over to the website, unchartedvet.com/events. We'll show you all of them and you can sign up. Otherwise, have a fantastic week. Andy, I'll see you face in a few days at AVMA.

Dr. Andy Roark:

[inaudible 01:00:15]. See you very soon.

Stephanie Goss:

Take care, everybody.

Dr. Andy Roark:

Bye, everybody.

Stephanie Goss:

Well, everybody, that's a wrap on another episode of the podcast. Thanks so much for spending your time with us. We truly enjoy spending part of our week with you. As always, Andy and I enjoyed getting into this topic. I have a tiny little favor to ask, actually, two of them. One is, if you can go to wherever you source your podcasts from and hit the review button and leave us a review. We love hearing your feedback and knowing what you think of the podcast. And number two, if you haven't already, hit the subscribe button. Thanks so much for listening, guys. We'll see you soon.

Written by Dustin Bays · Categorized: Blog, Podcast · Tagged: culture, management, Technician, Vet Tech

Jun 07 2023

Are We Still Doing Non-Competes?

This week on the podcast…

This week on the Uncharted Podcast, Dr. Andy Roark and practice management geek Stephanie Goss are in the mailbag with a question that might just light this episode on fire. An associate vet who is thinking ahead to owning their own practice is asking if they are nuts for considering throwing away the non-compete option someday as a practice owner. Especially when they view it in light of their own personal experience trying to separate from a toxic practice they found themselves in! Andy and Stephanie have some fairly strong opinions on this one so hang on folks, let's get into this…

Uncharted Veterinary Podcast · UVP – 235 – Are We Still Doing Non – Competes?

You can also listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music or wherever you get your podcasts.

Submit your questions here: unchartedvet.com/mailbag


Upcoming Events

June 21, 2023: Teaching Strategies That Foster Team Learning and Development with Josh Lucas

This event is for Uncharted Members. Learn more about teaching strategies for your team from former teacher-turned-practice-manager Josh Lucas. This is a members-only event. Join the Community for more content like this coming soon!

July 1, 2023: Effective & Efficient Team Meetings with Maria Pirita

Have you ever felt like your team would benefit from meeting more often, or maybe a little less often? Do you struggle to find techniques that truly make your team meetings effective? Find the right balance in this workshop.


Episode Transcript

Stephanie Goss:
Hey, everybody, I am Stephanie Goss and this is another episode of the Uncharted Podcast. This week we're diving into the mail bag, but we're picking out a letter. This one was kind of handpicked because I had a wonderful time talking about this exact topic with some of my peers last week at our Uncharted April Veterinary conference. So we're recording this, this isn't coming out until the end of May, but I was having this conversation about non-competes and feeling pretty fiery about it and lo and behold, there was something in the queue from the mail bag from an associate vet who is asking the question, “Am I kind of on planet crazy to consider one day, when I own my own practice, not having non-compete be a thing in that practice?” Andy and I have some strong thoughts on this topic, so let's get into this one, shall we?

Speaker 2:
And now the Uncharted Podcast.

Andrew Roark:
And we are back. It's me, Dr. Andy Roark and Stephanie, a kiss is not a contract, Goss.

Stephanie Goss:
That time you weren't ready.

Andrew Roark:
No, I… Okay. I was like, “Yeah, no, we're going.” And then I didn't. I double took. Yeah, A Kiss is Not a Contract actually is a song by Flight of the Conchords who I love.

Stephanie Goss:
I've not heard from those guys in a hot minute.

Andrew Roark:
Oh no. I still listen to the classics. Business time, still makes me just laugh.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh man.

Andrew Roark:
Oh man, I celebrate their collection. Oh boy.

Stephanie Goss:
How's it going?

Andrew Roark:
Oh man, it's good. It's good. It's raining here and so I've got a rowdy doodle that-

Stephanie Goss:
Wants to go out.

Andrew Roark:
That's determined to just make havoc because he can't go out.

Stephanie Goss:
Yes.

Andrew Roark:
So yeah, he woke up-

Stephanie Goss:
Shockingly it is also raining in Washington.

Andrew Roark:
Oh wow. Yeah. Oh, well, works out sometimes.

Stephanie Goss:
Because it's always raining here.

Andrew Roark:
Yeah, no. It's been beautiful.

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah.

Andrew Roark:
We're getting into the summertime in South Carolina at this point when it's coming out and boy, it's beautiful here, but it's nice to get a little bit of rain.

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah. Well, I am excited. I picked this one out of the mail bag. You guys have been doing a great job of sending in questions because there's quite the little queue built up in there, but I was having some conversation… Our Uncharted April event, when we're recording this, you and I just finished that last week and we're having some conversation about this topic and when I saw this mailbag question, I was like, “Ooh, let's do that one,” because I'm still super, super excited about it. So we got an email from someone who is currently an associate vet, but who is wanting to become a practice owner. And so they had quite a toxic environment that they were working in and quit their practice and the resulting interactions between themselves and the practice owner as they were exiting that practice left them thinking ahead to what they don't want to do one day when they're a practice owner.
And so their specific questions have to do with employment contracts and non-competes. So they were saying, “I find non-competes to be a little bit outdated, especially since I live in a pretty dense urban area. The non-solicitation piece I totally get, but who am I to begrudge an employee if they can find a better opportunity elsewhere? And with clients, there are so many of them that I really feel like, in an urban setting, “Does this really matter?”” And they were asking, “When I'm thinking ahead as a practice owner, am I crazy for thinking about disregarding non-competes from my contracts? What are your guys' takes on non-competes?” And I just was like, “Oh yeah, let's talk about this one.”

Andrew Roark:
Yeah, I think this is good. I think non-competes are an area where there are some significant changes that are taking place.

Stephanie Goss:
Yes.

Andrew Roark:
It is a big deal. I was talking to my friend, Dr. Lance Roasa, who's a veterinarian and also a lawyer, and he helps veterinarians with contracts. He's an awesome guy. I've interviewed him a couple times on the Cone of Shame podcast and this was something that he really teed off on as far as a hot area where change is really happening. So I think that that's really cool. So I'm happy to talk about this and where I think it's going and where it seems to be going. And then also I think we could talk in a little bit broader context about contracts in general. I think that that's a fun conversation.

Stephanie Goss:
Sure. Okay. I'm up for it. Like I said, we were having some soapboxy kind of conversation about this last week, so I'm excited. I'm here for it.

Andrew Roark:
Yeah. So before we start talking about non-competes, we need to talk about what the importance of the contract is. And I think a lot of people hand wave over this and they say, “Well, you get a contract. That's just what you do.” And I think there's a couple things about contracts that people maybe don't really think about or don't really understand. And so I will share with you through a school of hard knocks a couple things I have learned about contracts. I am a big believer in the idea that a contract is probably only worth the reputation of the two people who sign it. I really am. I think a lot of people, because they want to believe they have control in this world, believe that they're going to get a contract and that is what will be, and what is written in that contract is chiseled in stone.
And I can tell you, having navigated more of the legal system than I ever wanted to, that's not true. And I wish that it was, but it's not. You say, “Well, this is written down. How could that not be held accountable?” The two things that I would say to people is some people just flat out lie. You could say, “Well, they didn't do this.” And they'd say, “Yes, I did.” And you're like, “No, you didn't.” And unless you can prove that they did not do something, they can say that they did. And it is wildly frustrating, but there's nothing you can do about it. And I think that happens a lot. And they can also make up things and say that you did them. Unless you can prove that you didn't do the made up things that they said, they can muddy the waters.
Oh boy, that's a story for another day. But anyway, it is just a truth about our legal system is I always naively just kind of assume that people would be honest and what was written down would be enforced. And I can tell you, having played the game for a little bit, it ain't that way. The other thing is that enforcing contracts is really expensive. I mean, it is really expensive. Because you're hiring a lawyer at hundreds of dollars an hour to wade into trying to enforce this contract. And if you are going up against, especially a big company, one of my friends, as he put it, was, “Andy, you're fighting a grizzly bear with a pocket knife and it's not going to end well.”

Stephanie Goss:
That's a good analogy.

Andrew Roark:
It's a good analogy. You go, “Oh, I'm going to go up against the legal department of this massive corporation with my buddy Earl, the local attorney. This is going to go well.” Nope, nope. So anyway, those are hard lessons about contracts that I have learned, and I should have given a trigger warning before I laid that down because some people just really don't want to hear that, I'll just tell you that. That's the American legal system in a lot of ways. And I can't speak to the Canadian legal system, but that's it. I will also say, just as we talk about contracts, that suing people is a terrible, horrible experience that you really, really, really want to avoid. You want to avoid suing people as much as you want to avoid being sued. The whole thing is awful. And so when you start thinking about contracts, start thinking about, “What does this really mean and what is really going to be enforceable? And what am I actually going to do if this person violates these things? What are we going to actually do?”
And I'll save you a lot of turmoil that I went through over the years but the ultimate outcome is it's all relationships. It's all relationships and clear expectations. And so I'm not saying I don't use contracts, of course I do, but I think have a pretty healthy view of them, which is, I really don't want to use this. I think the big things that I want here are clear expectations about what I expect and what you can expect from me, and that is the most valuable part of the contract. And then just a focus on a relationship, which means I want to be a good, trustworthy, honest person and I want you to be a good, trustworthy, honest person. And we're going to communicate as we go along as if we didn't have a contract and we just had to work it out on good faith. And that's my best advice on contracts. And so as I start to lay that out and say, “This is what I've learned about contracts,” you can already probably see where I'm starting to go as far as non-competes and things like that.

Stephanie Goss:
Yes. And the other thing that I would add is I think it's funny, I remember really fairly early on in my career as a manager, I remember being asked to sign a contract. And I remember talking about it with my colleagues. And at the time, managers didn't have contracts, it was just doctors and everybody thought I was crazy. But I'll tell you the secret from a headspace perspective, because I think you're spot on, Andy. And for me, maybe I was just young enough and dumb enough and naive enough to not be worried about the legal perspective of it. And what I mean by that is I understood the gravity and I understood, “This is a legally binding document and I'm signing the thing.” I got all of that. And to your point, for me it was about spelling out the plan, spelling out the expectations on both sides.
And I was looking at it from a headspace perspective of, “Am I going to feel good going to sleep at night if I live up to the terms that I'm agreeing to? And on the flip side of that, if the other person in this relationship or persons in this relationship don't live up to their side of the bargain…?” I had a mentor explain it to me, and this was the light bulb moment, they were like, “You should have no qualms about walking away if you've lived up to your side of the bargain and they don't.” That's how I sleep easy at night. And that was really from a headspace perspective was the light bulb for me because it shifted my mindset when it came to the contract into the space that I think you're talking about, Andy, which is, “What's the point? What's the why behind it?”
Well, for me, on a personal level, I'm a big advocate for it, even for our team members, which a lot of managers look at me like I've completely lost my mind when I bring that up. But it's about clear expectations. It's about knowing what I want, what I can expect on both sides, and what my employer, in this case, generally can expect from me as an employee and what I can expect to receive from them.

Andrew Roark:
It should be a two-way document like that. That is the why of the contract for me. Now, additional point I want to add, as you say that, it is amazing to me how many people sign contracts without reading them.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh my gosh, yes.

Andrew Roark:
That's bonkers.

Stephanie Goss:
That's frightening.

Andrew Roark:
And I have seen it so many times and in big companies, I've been like, “You guys signed this thing, you signed this?” And don't be that person. Do not be that person. When you ask Andy Roark for advice and I look at it and go, “You signed this?” It's important, it's important if you're going to sign it… Especially if you're going to sign something that someone else wrote, you better really just read it and know what's in it.

Stephanie Goss:
Yes.

Andrew Roark:
And so that's the other part. The last thing I'll say about contracts, and this is sort of where I came to in my career a while back with contracts. And so this is what I aspire to, and I think that our writer will probably like this. I've talked on the podcast a number of times about Rawls' Veil of Ignorance and Rawls' Veil of Ignorance is this sort of mental exercise where you look at a system and you say, “If I was dropped into a different chair at the table than the one I'm at now, would I be okay with that? Would I feel like the arrangement was fair?” I'm not saying, “Would I be happy necessarily but would I feel like it was fair?” And that's Rawls' Veil of Ignorance. So I run Uncharted and we hire presenters and speakers and I have worked as a presenter and speaker for years and years, like 15 years now I've done this.
And it's interesting to be on the other side of the table because I'm looking at the event part and saying, “Boy, we got to pay the hotel and we got catering, all these things and blah, blah, blah.” And it has always been important to me to put forward a contract that I would think was fair if I was a speaker. That doesn't mean I would take it. I might say, “This is not enough money for me,” or blah blah, blah, blah, but I would feel that it was fair and I would not feel that it was a manipulative contract or it was trying to take more than what I thought was a fair agreement. And so I really tried to work it backwards and forwards to say, “Do I feel good about this as a person writing the contract? Would I feel that this was fair if I was signing the contract?”
And again, this is sort of a philosophical point, but I really think that that's what we should aspire to. I think that's part of being a good, honest, ethical person and a good employer is to say, “I want an agreement that works for me and I believe it's going to work for them and we can talk back and forth about it, but for the most part, I want this to be something that if I was on the other side, I would say, “Okay, I understand why you're asking for what you're asking for.” And we can decide whether it's 14 days of vacation or 10 or 20, but the basic idea being, “Okay, there's a limited amount of vacation and it's clearly stated and I'm on board with that.”

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah, I'm so glad you brought up the point about the fairness and looking at it from through Rawls' Veil of Ignorance, but also the perspective of, “Did you read this because I really can't believe you signed this?” From a headspace perspective, that's really important to me because if you read it and it seems incredulous, you should probably ask. You know what I mean? You should listen to the Spidey senses. And I speak not so much from personal experience, but I've had multiple conversations with young veterinarians and I know, Lance, having worked with as many vets as he has over the years, has heard this time and time again. To your point, people can ask for whatever they want. So as a practice owner, there's nothing to stop me from throwing out a contract that says you have to give me 12 months notice as a veterinarian because maybe in a perfect world, that's what I would want.
On the flip side of that, that's where I would be like from a headspace perspective, “Oh buddy, if you don't read that and you don't look at that and go, “I'm not signing this,” I'm giving you permission, look at that and say, “I'm not signing this,” because that's nuts.” That's where from a headspace perspective, we have to think about it from the perspective of a relationship. And sometimes relationships work great and everything works out really well and sometimes they don't. And so not to assume bad intent because we want to assume good intent, and so when we're framing it on both sides, we should think about it through the lens of good intent. And we should also think about it from the lens of, “This is a relationship and what happens if it doesn't work out? What does that look like?”
And it amazes me how often… And unfortunately this veterinarian who wrote into us found themselves in that predicament where they were trying to get out of their contract and they then went back and read their contract and sure enough, there was a clause in there that bit them in the butt in a big way. And they were like, “Well, never going to do that again,” which is where this came from. And it never ceases to amaze me how often I see that being the case for veterinarians and it makes me really sad.

Andrew Roark:
Well, the notice of leave part is one of the three big bugaboos that I see in contracts with veterinarians, and it's a really wonderful example of that Rawls' Veil Of Ignorance. And I say this because I talk to friends who are practice owners and they say, “Well, if you tell me you're leaving, Associate Vet Andy, it's going to take me four months to get another doctor given the hiring climate right now. And so I need you to give me four to six months notice so that I can find another veterinarian and my business is not damaged and I don't have to worry about having to lay off support staff because we don't have enough doctors,” and blah blah. And they have a very reasonable case from their side of the table on why they would like six months of notice.
And that's why the Rawls' Veil is really good because I said, “All right, clear your mind for a second. Now you come sit on my side of the table and you're an associate vet who's unhappy here or whose spouse is trying to leave. Are you going to stick around for six months after realizing that you need to go? Would you be willing to live apart from your spouse because they got a new job and you have to live alone for six months and pay two rents or a rent and a mortgage? Come on.” That's ridiculous if you put yourself on the other side of the table. And again, I'm not trying to vilify the owners, I understand exactly why they feel the way they do, but part of a good contract is to say, “I see this. Surely the associate vet recognizes, hopefully they recognize, why I need some runway. I need to know a bit ahead of time.”
And I don't know if people understand or not, I mean I hope that they do. So there is a reasonable amount of time to say, “Hey, go find yourself another vet and I want to give you some time and support you while you do that. And at the same time, I need to be free to go on and live my life after I decide that I need to go somewhere else.” And that seems very reasonable as well. So that's a big one. And again, I've seen so many doctors that when they recognize how much notice they're supposed to give is when they decided to leave and they're like, “Oh, 90 days? I'm supposed to do 90 days?” I'm like, “Yeah, that's what you agreed to.” So there's that. The other two areas I always throw out when I say to people, “You didn't read your contract?” The non-competes are a big one.
And I feel like the vet schools have done a good job where there's been a lot of business education in vet schools in a way there did not used to be. So I feel like this is less common, but boy, I remember 10, 12, 15 years ago, there were a lot of doctors who looked around and they were like, “I'm not happy here. I'm going to go work across the street.” And they looked down and it was like, “Oh no, I signed a 30 mile. I am not able to work in this town. My 30 miles runs out in the farmland outside of town, which means basically I have to leave town because it didn't work at this practice.” And I go, “Oh boy, that's a big one.”
The last one is negative accrual, which is again, it was phrased in a way that people didn't really recognize what it meant. And so what happened was the doctors would say, “Oh, I get paid on production, that's great. Let's go.” And what they didn't realize is that if they didn't hit their production numbers, they had to give back the amount… Oh, not really. But the amount that they came up short would be held against them as opposed to resetting and letting them try again next month. And so they would come in as a new graduate into a new system and they wouldn't have cases lined up and they wouldn't come anywhere close to hitting their assigned number.
And then they're so deep in the hole that when they are a good productive veterinarian, they're still buried underneath the deficit they had when they weren't fast and they weren't seeing cases. And again, I also understand from the practice owner's standpoint, when they say, “Well, I'm supposed to pay this person and if they're not generating revenue, then I shouldn't have to pay.” I'm like, “I get it kind of,” but also put yourself in the position of the doctor and you go, “This is not going to fly.”

Stephanie Goss:
It's funny because I can absolutely see both sides on all three of those points. The non-compete, the negative accrual, the leave, I can see arguments on both sides like you laid out. And so for me now where I'm at in my career, I look at it and I think for a lot of practices, particularly I would say that the reasoning behind it is different I think in corporate practice structure often from private practice structure, but ultimately I feel like there's a root of commonality between the two. And that is, “We don't like conflict.” And really for a lot of people, the contract serves to avoid communicating about those hard things. And so the negative accrual often is one of those things. And it's funny because I worked in a practice that paid their doctors solely on production, private practice, and we had negative accrual and I didn't think twice about it for a really, really long time.
And then I had an associate who was on the other side of the table and was asking some really great questions that really made me think about it. And what I realized is that that is a perfect illustration for we choose to have the contracts because we're afraid of the communication that has to come once someone isn't doing the thing that they're supposed to be doing, right? They're not upholding their end of the bargain. And from a headspace perspective, I think it helps get us into the place where we can assume good intent on both sides because if we look at it through the lens of, “Oh, we might be trying to have this document that will help us avoid some of this conflict,” it becomes easier to I think assume that good intent. And what I would say is, as leaders, whether you're a manager, practice owner or director, it's bullshit. You have to communicate.
So now my point of view has changed radically. I don't want to have to have a contract that has a non-compete or has a negative accrual because realistically, I really truly believe I'm not doing my job as a manager if I can't have the hard conversation with an associate, whether they're a new grad or a tenured doctor like yourself who's been practicing for years. If there's a change in your production level over time and you're not producing to pay yourself, that's a conversation that I should be able to have. I shouldn't have to say, “Your contract says this is what you're going to do, so this is the lever that I'm going to pull to get you to do what I want.” I should be able to take accountability for that and I should be able to have that hard conversation.

Andrew Roark:
Well, I love that you say that. It is amazing how many policies and contractual pieces are put into place to avoid having to actually manage people. And there's this fairytale of, “If you set it up the right way, you don't have to manage people.” That's the whole pro-sol mentality for doctors is, “We pay them, they have a base salary and then we pay them on production, and then that way they're going to work hard and they're going to work up cases and I don't have to talk to them about their medical skills and what they're recommending in the rooms because it all takes care of itself. And I guess-“

Stephanie Goss:
“Because if they want to get paid, they're going to do the things that I want them to do.”

Andrew Roark:
Exactly. And you go, “That is not true. You still have to manage those people,” but it's amazing how much that's set up to be that way. One of the things I want to say about contracts, and you propped this into my mind, one of the absolute critical things to remember with contracts is there is no right or wrong here. A lot of people are like, “Okay, Andy, tell me what to ask for my contract and I'll go and get it. So negative accrual, out. Six months of notice, out, blah, blah.” The truth is none of those things are chiseled in stone. My thing is not to say to you, “Don't take a negative accrual contract.” It's not. It's to say, “You need to understand what the deal is and then you need to decide what is right for you and your family.”
I don't think my employer would mind me saying this at the vet clinic, but I work on a straight production at the vet clinic where I work and I love it and I do not expect any sort of a base salary or anything like that because I have great schedule flexibility and I travel and I do lots of other things. And the deal with them was, “Hey, let me come and work and I'll have sort of a flexible schedule, but I want to be here. I want to see cases and then we'll do a production deal and that's all you have to pay me. And that way if I travel, you're not losing any money,” whatever. It works great for us and for where I am in my career. So I would not knock anybody that. If a vet understands what negative accrual is and says, “I understand why you want this, and so I'm going to agree to it,” I'm fine with that. I really am, as long as everybody's eyes' wide open about what the deal is and why it is.
And I'm trying to think of a reason an employer would want that. Maybe the vet is pushing for a really high base salary and the employer's like, “I don't know that you can make this.” And so they say, “Well, we'll do a negative accrual then.” Maybe that's a compromise that works. And so if so, I don't want people to say, “Oh, she said the words negative accrual and Andy says that's horrible.” It's not. That's not how life works. It really is about your specific relationship and what you get. And so the last part I want to put forward sort of in headspace on contracts is this. And so I want you to hear this because this is really important. If you go into a contract trying to get ahead, you are limiting probably the outcome that you can achieve.
It's like the prisoner's dilemma. So the prisoner's dilemma is this psychology game where we set it up and the game can be a little bit complex, but basically the idea with the prisoner's dilemma is you have two players in this game and the best outcome for you in the short term is to try to screw over the other person. And if you screw over the other person, then you will get the better outcome. However, if both people try to screw each other over, you get the worst outcome. And so in the short term, the best thing is for you to screw the other person over and then not to screw you over. If you play the game multiple times in an ongoing way, you very quickly realize that the best possible outcome is collaboration. Don't screw them over and they don't screw you over and we get the second-best outcome again and again and again and again and again and again. Otherwise, you'll screw them one time and then they'll try to screw you and then you both end up screwing each other and you get the worst outcome again and again and again.
And I see contracts like that. So I hope that's not too far of a stretch, but basically the idea is if you go into it going, “Aha, I'm going to stick this associate vet I'm hiring,” or you're the associate vet and you're like, “I'm going to ask for this ridiculous thing and force it…” Like, “I'm going to ask for a salary that's way beyond what I can actually earn or justify and I'm going to use hardball tactics, I'm going to get it,” you might get it, but you're going to have a short tenure at that practice and it's not going to be fun and you're going to feel less than and you're going to have to sit to a lot of conversations about how you're not producing what your salary warrants and then ultimately you're going to leave and that's going to be how it's going to go.
And you're probably not going to be super popular when you go. And I say that to both sides. I really believe going into contracts, the best thing is to treat this like a relationship. It really is. “These are my needs, these are your needs. I want you to understand where I'm coming from and why I'm coming from here. I want to understand where you're coming from, what's important to you. Let's make this thing in a way that we both get what we need and then let's continue to communicate on an ongoing basis to make those adjustments.” And that is the strategy I think for having a healthy, happy employment.

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah, I love it. How do you feel about taking a break here?

Andrew Roark:
Yeah, let's take a break.

Stephanie Goss:
Hey, friends, I just wanted to talk for a quick second about the maths with you all because I've been thinking a lot about the workshops and normally here's where we tell you what's coming up and we've got some great stuff happening so you're going to want to head to unchartedvet.com/events and check out the upcoming calendar but I want to talk about maths because if you are not already an Uncharted member, you can attend any one of our workshops and pay $99 a piece. Most of them are just $99. You can do it as a one-off, great and fine. However, that adds up really quick. And if you do the monthly workshop with us, and I've seen some of you there as repeat customers, which is amazing, but you could spend almost $1,200 over the course of the year doing workshops with us, or you could pay $699 and get a 12-month membership, which means you get all of the workshops that we do at no extra charge.
You also get access to our amazing conversation in the community, our community members, and all of our community resources. And it is hopping over there. We've got conversation 24/7, we have got activities, we've got book club. We're writing our handbooks together in Handbook Helper Group. This year we are talking about development and leadership growth, doing our development pathway this year. We are doing hallway conversations where we're talking about topics. These are sessions that are community led, community driven. It is topics about things that are going on in your practice that you want to talk about with your peers. All of that is happening and it's all included for your $699 membership. So simple m, do you pay almost $1200 for the year or do you pay $699?
If you're not currently a member, you should head over to the website and use this argument to convince your boss. “Hey, boss, I need to be a part of this amazing community because Stephanie told me and because she's telling you that you will save money.” Hopefully that works, but I couldn't resist. I hope to see you at our upcoming workshops. Again unchartedvet.com/events for everything that's coming. And now back to the podcast.

Andrew Roark:
All right, so let's get into the actual question that we were asked.

Stephanie Goss:
Okay.

Andrew Roark:
Which is basically, “I'm thinking about not having a non-compete. I am sensing that there may be a falling out of favor. Am I about to make a really terrible decision decision?”

Stephanie Goss:
Sure.

Andrew Roark:
Exactly. All right, cool. The way I like to look at this is let's look at the non-compete real fast and let's just look at the pros and the cons. So we'll start with that. I think that people in the last… Before we took a break, I said, “We need to be really honest about what do we want and need.” And if you're like, “Hey, negative accrual works for me and I understand why you want it,” then you can do that. I think non-competes can be that way too. The question for me has to be, “Why do you, practice, want me to sign this non-compete? What do you care about?”
And if they say, “Well, I don't want you to work for anybody else in town,” I would say, “Hey, you're going to need to go jump in the lake.” That's ridiculous because I would say, “I'm not interested in signing a contract that's going to make it so that I have to move away if this doesn't work out.” I'm not interested in signing that. If you're thinking about adding a non-compete, what do you care about? And I think most people when they stop and, again Rawls' Veil Of Ignorance, and they put themselves in the position of their doctor, they go, “Okay, my real fear is that they're going to go literally set up a practice across the street,” or, “They're going to get this clientele and they're going to go to our main competitor who we have a Hatfield-McCoy's feud with, and they're going to take our clients and go work there.”
And so that's why people put it forward. The other reason that a lot of businesses put it forward, just to be clear and candid about what's out there, if you're running a practice like you might sell your practice, a lot of the big buyers of practices really like non-competes. They want to have the doctors locked in there in a way that makes it hard for the doctors to leave if the sale goes through. And so what their worry is that the practice gets bought and the doctors all just flee, and now they've bought this practice, they don't have any doctors in it, and so they really like non-competes. And so there is some stability that comes from that, and there's a lot of places that want that. And so just talking about why it happens, I think there are the big reasons. Are there other reasons that you have, Stephanie?

Stephanie Goss:
I could see both of those for sure. The other way I guess that I've seen the non-compete use that makes some valid sense to me is the opening your own practice within a certain radius of the existing practice, because that feels radically different from the seat of the business owner. My associate not being a fit for my practice or being unhappy and going to work at another practice across town feels very different than my associate being mentored by me and my team and then going and opening their own practice right across the street. Those two things feel very different. And so I could totally see something in there from that perspective. But again, when you use Rawls' Veil, is it enough to justify having it in the contract? I don't know.

Andrew Roark:
Yeah, I don't know. Yeah, exactly. A lot of it was-

Stephanie Goss:
But I get wanting to ask for that.

Andrew Roark:
Of course.

Stephanie Goss:
For sure.

Andrew Roark:
And a lot of it is following suit forever. If you were an employer, you put a non-compete in, that's what you did. And so there was great pressure of, “This is how it's done and this is how it works.” So anyway, those are the reasons that I could come up with. “I don't want you to go work for a mega competitor,” “I don't want you to go and start up your own place and take half of our clients away from us. And again, can you accomplish some of that, “Don't take half of our clients away,” with non-solicitation agreements? I think you can to some degree. I really do. And then if you plan to sell the business, a buyer likes to know that doctors are locked in there. It gives them some security. So I get why that happens. What's funny is I start talking about training up a doctor and introducing them to your clients and they grow this clientele and then they leave and they work somewhere else.
You and I did a podcast back in April. It was the April 26th Uncharted. And it was about the technician that got trained and licensed and then left the practice after the practice had paid for licensing. And boy, this feels really similar. It really is that. “I'm investing into this person and putting all of this time and energy into them. And then what if they leave?” And you go, “Okay, I get it.” I think it hits very much on that same scarcity mentality of investing and then having someone go away and we don't like that. So anyway, I'll put this forward as reasons you would have a non-compete. I think the reasons that not have a non-compete, some of it would be, if you do the Rawls' Veil Of Ignorance and say, “I think most of us, we recognize that sometimes things don't work out.”
Someone comes and they work and then it doesn't work and they leave. And I would not feel good with saying to someone, “You have to leave town. You can't work in this town, so sit on your hands for two years.” I think morally I would sort of struggle with that. It doesn't feel like an equitable thing to do. So that's a big part of it. The other thing is that the winds are changing. The law is changing. In human medicine and in the legal profession, non-competes are now done. They're not allowed. And the rationale that was put forward to break that and make those things illegal is we should not have a system where doctors have a relationship with patients and then that patient-doctor relationship gets broken because the doctor has to leave because of a non-compete. We should keep that patient doctor relationship intact. The legal counsel-client relationship, same thing. That should not get broken if that person goes to work on their own or something else.
And so in order to protect those relationships, the non-competes have been struck down. I fully expect that veterinary medicine will probably fall into that same category for those same reasons. And we're already seeing that in a number of different states. There's a lot of pushback on this, right?

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah, it's been interesting to see the transition here in Washington, because they're not enforceable. And so it's been interesting to see the transition, especially working in corporate medicine. And there's often the perception of, “Well, every corporate contract has a non-compete,” and it's not true.

Andrew Roark:
Yes, I think that's important.

Stephanie Goss:
Like you said, we're already seeing it and I would expect that we continue to see it more and more and more. And from this, looking at the pros of why would you not have a non-compete, I think it's a lot healthier in so many ways. And I love the point about human medicine and legal profession because I think there's legitimacy to that. If you have a client or a patient that's particularly bonded to one of your veterinarians and that veterinarian is deeply unhappy or there's circumstances that make them want to leave their practice or they want to open their own practice or whatever it is, mentally, ethically, I guess my personal take is, “Do I really want to get in the way of that?” Leaning into your point about human medicine, if they have a relationship, go with them and I think it goes back to what you said about the scarcity mentality.
I think so many of us are afraid of losing clients, and we think about the one client, but we don't just think about the one client. We can't stop ourselves at the one client. We go from the one client to living in the forest in a cardboard box. We can't. It's just human nature. We can't stop ourselves from catastrophizing that. And so on the practice owner, the practice leader side of it, we go from that, “Well, maybe a few clients or their really loyal clients will follow them.” Well, that should be good. It should be good that they worked in my practice and they built a loyal client base who wants to stay with them because I should look at it from the perspective of, “I shouldn't be in a place where that change should make or break my business.” And I think that scarcity mentality is something that is really hard for a lot of us, myself included. It took me a really long time to get to this place. It's really hard for us to wrap our brains around because it's scary.

Andrew Roark:
Yeah, I agree with that. There's just a couple things that are just sort of absurd in non-competes that I see that people haven't really questioned for a while. Some of it was the distance in the non-competes. Like, look, if somebody's willing to drive 10 miles to see a veterinarian, for God's sakes, let them drive that far. I mean, at that point, you're getting into a relationship that that person really cares a lot about, right? And I have seen that. I've seen people put these huge non-competes out there and you go, “This is ridiculous. No one's going to take your clients at scale at anything beyond a couple of miles.” And then the other part is, and this has always kind of baffled my mind, so here's the thing, you're a veterinarian and you're going in to take a job and you're like, “I've never worked here before and I don't know anybody.”
And they're like, “Here's a one-year contract, sign this non-compete.” And you're like, “How fast do you think I'm going to meet people?” And I get that the idea is introducing it early on but here's the thing too, there's a very good chance that I'm going to come here for one year, it's not going to be a great fit, and that I'm going to leave. We don't like to believe it… I think a huge percentage of relationship, especially with brand new veterinarians, that first year in practice, they're going to leave after a year. Why in the world are you making it so they can't stay in town? It doesn't make any sense. Now, I understand when people are like, “Oh, this person's been here 10 years and they have this huge clientele,” and blah, blah, blah. That feels different. I think there's different reasons there to say, “Well, this person at this point has kind of earned these relationships,” and so on and so forth.
But anyway, that was a thing as a… I remember being a brand new graduate or even not a brand new graduate, but as someone who would move to an area and they're like, “Here's the contract. Also if this doesn't work out, you can't work anywhere near here for two years.” And I'm like, “That's ridiculous. If we get six months into this and it's not working, I shouldn't be blown up for two years. That's not right.” So anyway, I've seen a lot of that stuff.

Stephanie Goss:
And I think on the flip side for a second, you just brought up a really, really good point. So I think there's validity for not having a non-compete. From the perspective of the associate, to your point, if it doesn't work out for me, I should not be restricted for two years from moving on. That is total BS. And this is where it's about, “We don't want to communicate,” coming into play. On the flip side, as a practice owner or practice manager, why, for the love of all that is holy, why would I want to trap an employee into a contract with me where if they are miserable, they might stay just to live out their crappy contract that I gave them in the first place because they're afraid of getting sued? I don't want them to be in my practice making my life and everybody else in the practice's lives miserable for two years because they're afraid of that.
Why would I do that to myself? And yet I see it time in time again from practice owners because they're thinking about leveraging it in the positive to protect themselves. But realistically, it, also to your point, opens you up just as often to that from the negative side because it is a relationship and sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. And we have to think about that because we are also trapping ourselves when we use the non-compete in that regard, especially when it comes to those leave notices or the, “Don't go to another practice within a such and such certain distance.”

Andrew Roark:
It can feel punitive rather than strategic meaning, “Oh, you want to leave? I am going to shut you down. I am going to punish you. I'm going to give you a two-year headache because you left.” And that's not a good place to build a reputation. The last part, when you factor this in, is there are more and more practice groups that are advertising no non-competes. They are like, “We don't believe in non-competes and we are not doing it.” And you can take them at their word and go, “Wow, some people are really great.” Or you can be more cynical and say, “Ooh, that's a hiring advantage. They've figured out that they're probably not going to be able to keep using these anyway. And so they're casting them down and trying to use that as a strategic advantage in hiring.”
But that said, I think more and more doctors are going to hear about places that don't need non-competes or require non-competes. And so I don't know how widespread that's going to be, but I do think it's probably going to happen. And so anyway, all that around, so takeaways from me and then you can decide if you want to jump in on this, these working relationships are relationships. Everybody should be open about what they're offering and what they need. And the plan should be that the contract is part of the ongoing conversation of us working together, and they should put that down. I think non-competes are falling out of favor across the country. I don't know if that will be a complete sweeping change in the next 10 years or if that will be spotty, but they are starting to fall out of favor.
I think your options as an employer are either to say, “We are not going to use them and we're going to focus instead on just trying to maintain good relationships. And we understand that there's some risk, just like we understand there's a risk of us training our staff and then having them leave to go work somewhere else. It's just a risk that we incur.” I think that's probably the healthiest way to go. The other alternative would be to say, “Hey, I have these very specific concerns and this is kind of what I need to feel safe.” And I would say you should dig into what those specific concerns are and communicate upfront.
I mean, there is a way to say, “We're going to have non-compete. It does not kick in until you've worked here for three years. And at that point, if you're here for three years, then it's going to be a fairly limited range, and it's for these really important reasons.” I think you can talk about that just like we talked about the other parts of the contract and say, “If you have a good why and you're willing to make concessions to get the other person to agree to that, and you can articulate what your needs are, if you're okay with it and the vet's okay with it and everybody feels good, then go with it.”

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah. Yeah. I love it. And the only other thing that I would add to your point about it's a relationship and the contract helps define that relationship is on both sides. Especially knowing that this ask came to us from a potential practice owner, I'm going to throw out there, “Don't forget that needs change and they change on both sides.” And so the other piece of this that often doesn't get talked about, but I think that goes along with the ideas of non-competes and negative accrual and stuff like that, that is the winds of favor are shifting, is the perpetual contracts where it's like, “I don't review your contract again until you bring it up.” And as a manager, oh man, so much anxiety, especially early on in my career when one of my associate doctors would be like, “I would like to discuss my contract,” because it felt very negative.
It felt like, “Oh gosh, they're going to ask for some big change and it's going to be the end of the world.” The reality is we're humans in a relationship on both sides, and my needs change as an associate in the practice and my needs as a practice owner change, and we should have a system and a structure. Again, it goes back to the contract can't be the thing that you hide behind because you're afraid of the hard conversations. It has to be set up so that both people in the relationship have the ability to communicate their needs and make it work for them together. And to your point, Andy, sometimes we are in different corners. How do we bridge that gap to come together?
And so I think that's the other piece as a practice owner is if you're doing that to your team, if you're just like, “We're going to do your contract and then we're not going to review it again until you bring it up,” that would definitely be something that I would suggest. Take the stress and anxiety out of it and make a system for it so everybody knows, that it's communicated upfront like, “This is what we're going to do, this is how we're going to do it, this is when we're going to do it.” Put it on the calendar and then actually follow through.

Andrew Roark:
No, I agree.

Stephanie Goss:
Cool, cool.

Andrew Roark:
Well, I mean that's what I got. It's not the firm, “This is how you do it,” answer, but hopefully it's a good way of thinking about contracts in general. Start with the end in mind. What do we want to accomplish? Then going into the relationship, talking about needs that I have, needs the other side has, and then trying to come up with something that works for everybody. Know that non-competes seem to be losing favor. Know that there's other companies that are going without them and using that as a recruiting tool. Just adjust and react appropriately.

Stephanie Goss:
This is so fun. Take care, everybody. Have a fantastic week.

Andrew Roark:
Thanks, everybody. Take care.

Stephanie Goss:
Well, gang, that's a wrap on another episode of the podcast, and as always, this was so fun to dive into the mailbag and answer this question, and I would really love to see more things like this come through the mailbag. If there is something that you would love to have us talk about on the podcast or a question that you are hoping that we might be able to help with, feel free to reach out and send us a message. You can always find the mailbag at the website. The address is unchartedvet.com/mailbag, or you can email us at podcast@unchartedvet.com. Take care, everybody, and have a great week. We'll see you again next time.

Written by Dustin Bays · Categorized: Blog, Podcast · Tagged: culture, doctor, hiring, management, Practice ownership

May 31 2023

When Non-Veterinarians Disagree with Veterinarians on Medicine

This week on the podcast…

This week on the Uncharted Podcast, Dr. Andy Roark and practice management geek Stephanie Goss are in the mailbag to take on a question from a practice owner. One of their managers is disagreeing with one of the associate veterinarians and there are some hurt feelings and upset on both sides. There also happen to be good points from both the manager and the doctor involved in this instance and this practice owner needs some help keeping the peace! Let's get into this…

Uncharted Veterinary Podcast · UVP – 234 – When Non – Veterinarians Disagree With Veterinarians On Medicine

You can also listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music or wherever you get your podcasts.

Do you have something that you would love Andy and Stephanie to role-play on the podcast – a situation where you would love some examples of what someone else would say and how they would say it? If so, send us a message through the mailbag!

We want to hear about your challenges and would love to feature your scenario on the podcast.

Submit it here: unchartedvet.com/mailbag


Upcoming Events

Upcoming events: unchartedvet.com/upcoming-events/


Episode Transcript

Stephanie Goss:
Hey everybody, I am Stephanie Goss, and this is another episode of the Uncharted Podcast. This week on the podcast, we are tackling an issue that Andy and I had a really good time talking through. We have a friend who is a practice owner and they are struggling with their practice manager, having some disagreements with some of the doctors over some of the decisions that they're making on the floor.
There are good points on both sides of this situation and argument, and this practice owner needs help figuring out how to keep the peace. This was a fun one. Let's get into it.

Meg:
And now the Uncharted podcast.

Andy Roark:
Hey, and we are back. It's me, Dr. Andy Roark and the one and only Stephanie. Before you accuse me, take a look at yourself, Goss. Oh man.

Stephanie Goss:
How's it going, Andy Roark?

Andy Roark:
Oh, it's good. It's good. I took my daughter to a 5K fun run on Saturday, and our friend Tyler Grogan, had signed us up to go. And so I was like, “Okay, Tyler's going and some of the other people in the Uncharted team are going. And I was like, I'm, I'm going to go as well.” And I was going to take Hannah, who's my 11-year-old, and it would be sort of her first cross country. She's never ran more than maybe two miles I think, something like that.
So my expectation was we were going to get there and we were just going to kind of run-walk, and it was about being together. So we would do that. And so we go to this 5K, and it's put on by the local animal shelter. And so there are dogs everywhere because they were like, “Bring your dogs.” And I'm like, “I like dogs, I love dogs, I love dogs, I love pet owners.”

Stephanie Goss:
This will be fun.

Andy Roark:
This will be great. And then I got there. And I was like, “This a terrible idea.” It's a terrible idea to bring together literally hundreds of people with the objective of running 3.2 miles and then be like, ‘Bring your dogs.'” And so there we are. And they're like, “Thank God they didn't have a starting line.” But a couple things came into my mind.
Every time I go to a place where there's people and dogs, I am reminded of how pet owners tell themselves stories about their dogs and just hold onto those stories despite all evidence.

Stephanie Goss:
Sure.

Andy Roark:
There was the dog having a full on panic attack, and people were like, “Look at him. He loves coming to things like this.” And I'm like, “That dog, his eyes, bulging out of head just trembling full body shakes, nails dug into the ground.” And they're like, “He's such a social dog.”
And I'm like, “He's too scared to move. What are you doing?” Before they started, they were like, “If you plan to run fast, come to this end of the group.” And all these people just moved down there with their chihuahuas on leashes. And I'm like, “What? This lady with an English bulldog?” And I'm just like, again, the stories that they tell themselves about their pets is amazing to me. So anyway, so they all do it and finally they're like, “They don't have a starting gun, thank God.” But they're like, ‘Ready, set, go.'” And hundreds of people take off running at the same time. And as you can imagine, it's pandemonium. And there's this woman with this big pit bull running up out of ahead of me and Hannah. And the pit bull is morbidly obese. It's a BCS 11 of nine, and then it runs about a hundred yards.
And then stop. It's like, I'm done and just sits down and the lady runs right into it. She goes down.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh no.

Andy Roark:
And the people behind her go down and then all the dogs around them are like, what are you guys doing? And they come pulling over and now these leashes are pulled out like trip wires.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh no.

Andy Roark:
And there's like retractable leashes everywhere. It's everything that's completely horrible that you can ima … It all happened. And I was like, “Hannah, we're going over.” And we lept over. Did not stop to help. Just so you know, I'm kind of like lady, you know thy self, know thy dog. And you didn't. And so I get it. She was in the middle of hundreds of other people. And again, it's a race. I told myself that stopping would have caused more problems.

Stephanie Goss:
So you were also telling yourself stories in your head.

Andy Roark:
Exactly right. Survival stories, Stephanie Goss. Stories about-

Stephanie Goss:
Someone else is going to help that woman. It's fine.

Andy Roark:
She was shielded by the dog, really it was like-

Stephanie Goss:
I'm sure there's another vet in the crowd who could have made sure the dog was okay.

Andy Roark:
I'm sorry. She didn't need a vet. And the pit bull was fine because she was big and he just laid down. And no one's stepping on that dog, I'll tell you that. That lady is to fend for herself. But that dog was fine.
We got like two miles into the run, and there's this lady sitting on a bench and she's holding this Chihuahua and he's 100% asleep just like nose under her chin, you know what I mean? She's holding him like a baby and his legs are up in the air and we go jogging by, and my daughter and I look at her and she looks at us and she goes, “He's done.” And I'm like, okay, I love it. But she says, “He's done.” That's what I wanted to be. We're two miles into that. I was like, I would like to lay down and just be done, but everyone …
So anyway, it was, again, I loved it. Wonderful time with my daughter. I still love pet owners, I still love pets. I'm just not a hundred percent bought into hundreds of pet owners and pets together doing a thing at the same time.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh, that's fantastic. But it's for charity.

Andy Roark:
Yeah.

Stephanie Goss:
That's a real good cause.

Andy Roark:
Felt very good about supporting. I felt very good about supporting. And it really was fun. And so that was that.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh gosh, Tyler's take on the event was radically different than yours.

Andy Roark:
Oh, well, see, she just walked.

Stephanie Goss:
I don't know that there was ever running in the idea, although I could see Tyler being a runner, but it was like, we'll do this fun thing together as a team and we'll talk and just meet, make our way through and it'll be bonding.

Andy Roark:
I showed up with my itty bitty booty shorts.

Stephanie Goss:
I'm taking off.

Andy Roark:
Yeah, I showed up tan lines-

Stephanie Goss:
“Let's get this done.”

Andy Roark:
Out there so that everybody could say like, “Little tiny runny shorts.” I was doing the quad stretch where I'm holding my ankle and other ankle, and Tyler's like … She was wearing yoga pants and a sweatshirt.

Stephanie Goss:
And I saw the picture, and Steph's got her coffee in her hand and I'm like, “There was never the intention.”

Andy Roark:
I was like, “Are you guys going to put your coffees down before the race starts?” And they just both just looked at me like I was so dumb.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh, it's fantastic.

Andy Roark:
We're wired a little bit differently, Tyler and I.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh man. Well, glad to know that we haven't even started this episode, and we're off the rails.

Andy Roark:
Oh yeah. Well, you asked how I was doing. That's how I'm doing. How are you doing?

Stephanie Goss:
Fair. I am excited about this episode because when I read this episode I was like, “Did I write this in our ideas database and forget that I wrote it?” Because it is a hundred percent a situation that I had in my practice, and it came from someone else. But I think this is going to be one of those episodes that people are like, “Hmm, I think they might be talking about my practice.” So it came to us from a practice owner who was struggling because they have someone on their leadership team who is fighting with some of the doctors.
And so they unpacked what fighting means and it was a really good unpacking, but they kind of framed it with like, “Help. I need help figuring out how to keep the peace on my team.” So there are some disagreements when it comes to the quality of medicine that is being practiced.
And so this practice owner was like, “Look, I set the standards for my practice and I trained my manager to uphold the standards that I decided on.” Fair. And now the practice has grown and there's multiple doctors on the team, so it's grown from a small practice to a bigger practice. And so they were like when an associate doctor wants to do something differently than our standard, this member of the leadership team and one of the managers has somewhat of a spicy approach to disagreeing with the other doctors.
And this practice owner was like, “Look, I get it because on one hand, I appreciate and want them to do their job and I want them to enforce our standards of care. I want them to enforce the protocols. That's what I've asked them to do. And on the other hand, they didn't go to vet school, the doctors went to vet school and the doctors are making decisions in real-time, and I need to figure out a way to make this not be a spicy conflict when it arises and figure out how to manage the situation when a non-DVM leader in the practice disagrees with one or more of the doctors on the medicine side.”
And they were like, “It's a really fine line. I have no idea where to start. Please help.” And I just thought that this one was a fantastic one. It's one that we haven't talked about before. And like I said, my mind immediately went to the treatment room into this situation that happened in my practice, and I was just like, “I could have written this.” So I'm excited to talk about this one.

Andy Roark:
I like this one a lot. This is one of those fun balancing different people type problems that I really enjoy. So yeah, this is good. All right, cool.
Well, let's start with some head space just to get into this a little bit. The first thing I'm going to say in head space is this is a classic example of what we're fighting about is not what we're fighting about. Absolutely, there is so much baggage here. The first challenge here is to get everyone to understand what we're actually talking about because otherwise they will not. And so we've talked a lot about this.
I tell a story sometimes about forgetting to get a babysitter when I had told my wife I was going to take her out on a date, and my oldest daughter was like 11 and my youngest daughter was eight. And she was like … The night came and we were getting ready to go in an hour or two, and she was like, “Who's the babysitter?” And I was like, “We don't need a babysitter.” And she was like, “Yeah, we do.” And I was like, “No, we don't. Jacqueline is old enough to watch her and Hannah and we can go.”
And Allison was like, “No, she's not.” And I was like, “Pretty sure she is, and I'll Google it and see what I'll see the legal.”

Stephanie Goss:
Shut up.

Andy Roark:
Ah well, there's legality here. There's a legal precedent. And I am going to investigate it and see what it is. And so I googled it. And 11 years old in the state of South Carolina is the answer. And so clearly I won the argument and then we both just agreed that I was right and we went on a lovely date. That's not what happened. We did not finish the argument the way that I had hoped. It escalated, if anything.
Ultimately, this is an example of the fight is not about the fight. The fight was not about how old the children need to be in order to be left alone. The fight was about Andy didn't get a babysitter even though he said he was going to take his wife on a date and now this is a thing and he really dropped the ball, and he hasn't apologized for dropping the ball– he has made excuses instead. And so that's an argument that's not really about the argument. The same thing is here too. When you go to the doctor and say, “You are not upholding the standard of care.” You are saying a lot of things you are saying you did not take acceptable care of the patient, you possibly don't know what you're doing, you are not worthy of being here based on this result.
People get real defensive about those things really fast. There's a lot of stuff about identity, self-worth, your medical knowledge, your values. Are you doing a good enough job, are you walking your talk, all of those sorts of things. There's an ethical component. You are doing something unethical. You were negligent. “When you say you didn't meet the standard of care,” what I hear is you were negligent in your treatment of the patient. And that's not what the person said, but boy, you better believe all of those things, depending on the individual you're talking to, they come right to the top of mind. And so the first thing we've got to do is know that when you go to the doctor and you confront them this way, if you walk right up to them and say, in this case you did this, you're going to get a lot of strings attached to the response you get back.

Stephanie Goss:
Yes. Well, I mean to your point when you were telling us the story at the beginning of the episode, it's about the stories that we tell ourselves in our head. And I think that's from a head space perspective, I agree with you a hundred percent. It's never the conversation or the argument that's about the thing. It's always something else. And the question is it about something else on both people's parts? On one person's part on? You have to figure all of that out. And so I think from a head space perspective, for me, I think part of it is about where we always start, which is part of the talking about having a safe conversation. And when I think about looking at this, one of the questions that I try and ask myself … putting myself in this practice owner's shoes, one of the things that I would hope that I would do would be to ask my manager, “What else could this be about? What could the vet have – are there things you think that the vet could have been thinking about to help assume good intent?”
Because there are things on both sides. The vets are thinking about other things. They are weighing in things that the manager may or may not know about. And to the practice owner's point, they went to vet school, they have a medical degree that proves them perfectly competent to make those decisions. And there is reasoning there and getting curious about what that reasoning is and why it happened is really I think important to assuming good intent.
And on the flip side, getting curious about why the manager is asking questions is also important because to this practice owner's point, the manager's job is to care about the decisions that the doctor's making because they are supposed to be thinking about things like patient safety and client experience and the impact to the practice and staff retention and staff satisfaction, and all of those things. So they have a vested interest as well. And when you have two parties that are both potentially telling themselves stories in their heads, I think where you have to start is with that assuming good intent and asking yourself part of, am I safe to have this conversation for me in problem-solving this, and I know we're not to actions yet.
But is to ask yourself what else could this mean? Why might they have made this decision ahead of the conversation? It's also one of the action steps that I am going to encourage to the manager to ask in the moment, but teach them a healthy way to do it. But it's important for them to ask themselves that question of, why else could they have made that decision?

Andy Roark:
That is exactly the approach whenever you have these conversations that are not about the conversation, whenever you have these emotionally-loaded things, I would say the little two-pack combo that I would put front and center in head space is exactly what you said, it's assume good intent, first of all. If you go in and say this person failed or you didn't do what you're supposed to do, this thing is already going to go … It's already going to go sideways. It's like right off the bat, this thing is already going to go badly. Just count on it. Assume good intent. Assume the person was acting with noble intentions.
And then the second part is seek first to understand. I'm assuming this person had a good reason for doing what they did. I want to understand what it is so I can understand how it fits into the context of our medical standards. Do we need to make changes to our medical standards? Do we need to make changes to our medical standards or how we talk about them so that in these cases, this is something that it fits into our standards so that … and we can get into it in a second, we're going to start getting into what are the consequences here, what we want to make sure that the team understands what's going on, we want to make sure that the team is able to support you, but they can't support you if they don't understand what's happening.
So all of those are very productive ways to unpack these sorts of things. But I think there's two pieces here. I think number one is when you start to unpack what happened, you better get into a good, healthy, curious, positive head space. And then number two is I would say unpack it and then you need to put all of this aside and you need to talk about what you're going to do in the future. And then you need to have a positive, productive conversation about where are we going in the future. If this turns into the manager arguing with the doctor about a case that happened yesterday, the manager's going to lose, and they should lose because they're not a doctor. They're like, “That's it.” Anyway, I'd say they should lose again, but you get my point. It really does come down to two people, have a clear disagreement about a case, the person who's a professional veterinarian should probably have a stronger leg to stand on.

Stephanie Goss:
Well, and I would say I disagree with that slightly in the sense that I think there have been times where I have had two doctors who disagree on what to do with the case. They're both educated, they both have the veterinary degrees, and they have different opinions or different perspectives. And so I think it's about finding that middle ground to your point about getting curious where you're seeking to understand why are you doing the thing to figure out how are you going to be able to move forward in the future.
It's not about making someone feel right or wrong or you know less than they do because I'll tell you, I've worked with a lot of managers who know a whole lot of things and who will bring about medical concerns that others on the teams may not have brought up. So, I think there's validity there, and it's hard. I get fired up and on my soapbox as a manager who didn't originally come from the medicine side of things when people are like, “Well, you're just a manager, you don't know anything,” and not that's what you said because that's not how I took it at all.

Andy Roark:
No, I didn't want to bring that across. I might need to restate that, but …

Stephanie Goss:
No, that's not how I took it at all. And I think it's important to recognize that we're all telling ourselves some degree of story and filtering it through the lens of our own experience. And so it doesn't matter whether you went to vet school, or didn't go to vet school because you can have two people who even went to the same vet school who have radically different perspectives on how to treat the same case. And so I think it's about that finding that … I'm so glad that you said the seek first to understand because a huge part of that head space is like what are we doing and why are we doing it, are we doing it simply because as the business owner I said we need to have protocols, these are the protocols I set up and you're enforcing them.
Wonderful. I appreciate that so much. I appreciate you doing your job fantastically well. And protocols change. Medicine changes. Medicine is radically different now than it was 20 years ago when I started. We're using different drugs, we're using the same drugs in radically different ways. Things change and things have to be flexible. And so I think getting curious on all three sides of this, because there really are at least three sides here and you brought up a fourth when you talk about the rest of the team, getting curious and asking those questions about, “Why? Tell me more,” is really going to help us get to the heart of how do we tackle this and how do we fix it. And it being future-facing is so important and I'm really glad that you said that.

Andy Roark:
And just to give some color to this because as I say sort of the veterinarian should have the stronger leg to stand on. What I mean, I don't mean, hey, if this person's a vet, then they're right and the other person is wrong and that's all there is to it. I don't buy into that vet worship stuff. And you know that. I think when I say that, I still stand by that as a general rule. And it's a lot of it is because one, yes, there's a difference in medical training, but the bigger part for me is the veterinarian is the one who is in the room. And yes, they're a human being and they're making decisions in the moment on the fly. And I feel like whenever possible, we need to support the person who was in the room making decisions in the moment and who could actually talk to the client and read the situation and see what's going on.
And this is where my point comes from, I'm always a bit wary of someone picking up the medical record two days later and saying, “You clearly did this wrong.” And going in there, I think that that's a recipe for disaster. And so I don't want to overstate that or make it about positions– this person's in the right and this person's not. I just think that when we start to get the benefit of the doubt. I'm a big fan of giving a benefit of doubt to the person who was there, who was looking the pet owner in the eye, who was looking at the pet and who was trying their best and who was working with the information that they had at the moment as opposed to standing back and saying, well, clearly, we have it written down that this is how we do these cases. So that was sort of the point that I was trying to make there.

Stephanie Goss:
Sure, for sure. Well, that feels like armchair quarterbacking, right?

Andy Roark:
Yeah, exactly.

Stephanie Goss:
It's like you're being asked to make a call or make a judgment when you weren't in the middle of things. And so I think there's validity there. And I certainly felt that. And like I said in the beginning, this is … I could have written this and I struggled because to your point, I wasn't in the room but my manager, my leader was– she was the tech on the case with the doctor. And so now I have that situation of two people with medical backgrounds with experience who have radically different takes on how to manage the thing. And now I wasn't in the room, but I'm being asked to make judgment calls on how do we move this forward and holy hell, it's hard. It's so hard.

Andy Roark:
And I have 100% seen those things where a doctor and technician were on the same case and they had very different opinions about how it went. And it's very hard. And if you're the manager who gets brought into that and you weren't there and you didn't see what was happening, boy, it's a nightmare case, it's a hard case. I do want to point out at this point, this is a problem of success in a lot of ways, which means you get problems like this when people care a lot about what they're doing and they care about doing a good job. And so these are not awful problems to have in that they only come around because you have people who are really engaged and who really care. And so I do think that that's a good thing.

Stephanie Goss:
And I think that's one of the most powerful tools for when we get into action steps because leveraging that and acknowledging how much they care on all sides will go a tremendous way towards making this a future-facing conversation and dropping that anxiety level over, “Hey, we've got to talk about the disagreement.”

Andy Roark:
I completely agree. I guess my last part in head space is I would 100% make sure that this conversation is not framed as right and wrong. “That the technician is right and the doctor's wrong or the doctor's right and the manager's wrong.” I would not frame it that way. I don't think that's productive. I think it leads to hurt feelings. There is no arbiter of medical care in the sky who says, “Yes, this was the optimal way to proceed.” That's not even possible. I mean, I'll say I've seen cases where the doctor practiced the pinnacle highest premium standard of care, and the pet owner left and got really angry when they got home because they were like, “I couldn't afford this and you did all of these things and now I'm not coming back because I can't afford you guys anymore and blah blah blah.”
And again, medically speaking, the doctor did the best thing. Yet, there's a client who's angry on the phone saying, how dare you do all of these things when I just wanted my pet taken care of in this basic simple way. And you go, “I don't know what's right.” If you work the case up to the point that the pet owner never comes back again, was that optimal? I doubt it, but I don't know. You know what I mean?
So anyway, that's why … I try to throw those shades of gray in there, not to irritate anybody about what the standard of care should be, but just to say there's not a right answer. There's only guidelines, there's only sort of our values and how we position ourselves. There's only consistency, and consistency is really important. And so when we start to get into action steps, we're going to start to talk about what matters and what's important. But I do think that … I guess we can put this as groundwork, starting to have some agreements in our team about what our values are, about what we care about. Those things are really important for having these conversations. If you don't have sort of team values, core values, things like that that say these are the things we care about, this is a really hard conversation to have. If we can come up with some things that we all agree on about what's important in the way we treat each other about the what's important in the way we treat the pet owners, then we can use those as touchpoints to start to make some standards.
But if we don't have any conversations about what's important to us, what our identity as a team is, then it's really hard for us to make standards because the standards that you are interested in and the standard that I'm interested in, they can be wildly different. And we've seen that. Anybody who's been in vet medicine for very long has seen some practices where they just let the doctors completely run however they want. And you've got one doctor who may or may not be the senior doctor who's like, “No, we're doing it. We're doing old school.” And you've got new doctors who go, “I can't look, I just can't. Look at that.” And I'm not trying to throw anybody under the bus or ageist anything, but just give an example of a common one we see is people who practice medicine very differently.
I've seen old-school doctors who have kept up and done a lot of learning and they are amazing, much better doctors than I am. So it's not anything about anything other like that. I use that as a classic example of doctors doing very different things in the same building. And it happens a lot. And boy is it hard to get them onto the same page, and they can get really defensive really fast.

Stephanie Goss:
For sure. And I think your point is a great one, and when you do have agreements about how you're going to work, what your values are, even like you're going to talk to each other or manage through conflict, which is one of our action steps here coming up. But even if you don't have that, your point about this is a problem of success, they both care. The doctor cares about the patient and is trying to do the best thing for the patient. And this manager or managers or whoever is concerned about it, cares about the patients as well. It's not less or they're caring about … And maybe they are caring about different things, but they both care.
And so starting there and being able to say, Hey, I know we're having this conversation because I know how deeply you both care about your work and I want to use that to figure out how do we come to some agreement on how do we deal with this in the future. Using that works whether you have stuff formalized or not. And it works whether you have … The problem is with all doctors, I had that exact conversation when my doctors all disagreed on how to manage a certain type of case and what kind of drugs we were going to carry. And I was like, “Look, you guys all agree, you're all really smart. I don't have a degree in veterinary medicine. I'm not going to make the call here, but I need us to work together to figure out what is going to be our agreement between us” because the team can't have it four different ways.
And so it's about how do we find that common ground. And so I think that head space of “this is the problem of success” is a really healthy one to help move into those action steps of talking about it.

Andy Roark:
I also think to some degree, it can make the conversation easier when you have multiple points of view because then you can clearly say, “I'm not picking sides.” We need to come together and find a path that has us all doing the same thing. So anyway, I think that's probably where I'd be for head space. So it's just sort of summarize real quick. Remember this is a problem. We're not really talking about the problem. You have to be very careful here about people's emotions, self-worth, self-identity, values, things like that. So just we want to be really, really careful here. The combo to start off with is going to be assume good intent and coach to assume good intent and then seek first to understand is try to understand what's happening, what's going on.
Remember to put your standards of care forward as a living document. Whatever your standard of care is today, that's not going to be your standard of care in 10 years. You're going to continue to evolve and change as we learn things. And so that also makes the standards of care a less scary, chiseled-in stone thing. It's something that we can talk about, and that's okay. Remember the end result that you want to try to get. The end result is important. The end result is not to make the doctor apologize or to take the manager down a peg. If that's what you're trying to do. You are off base. The end result is to come to an understanding so that next time the case comes in, we have some agreement about how we're going to proceed as a team so everybody feels included and safe and onboard, and that's the end result that we're looking for.
And so if you pull the flaming raging sword of justice and you go seeking to figure out who is right and who is out of line, is it the doctor that is wrong and negligent, is it the manager that is overstepping her bounds, none of that's going to end well. In any sort of way, it ain't worth it. Just go in there and talk to everybody and figure out what's happening and what we're going to do next time.
And the last thing I would say is remember just to lay down why are we doing this. And that's going to be my first part in the action steps. “Why is this even important?” And I think a lot of people fall into the idea of, well, this is a test, and there are rules and you broke the rules or you didn't break the rules. And I go, “Who wants to play that game?” That doesn't make any sense. “This person was wrong, and I know the rules and I'm going to show them they were wrong.” I go, “Okay, if that makes you feel better, you can do that, but you should really enjoy it because you're going to have weeks of pain in the neck trying to get past this conversation, and it's fallout.”

Stephanie Goss:
For sure. Okay, well, let's take a break and then come back and talk about where do we go from here, how do we manage this.
Hey friends, I just wanted to talk for a quick second about some maths with y'all because I've been thinking a lot about the workshops and normally, here's where we tell you what's coming up and we've got some great stuff happening. So you're going to want to head to unchartedvet.com/events and check out the upcoming calendar. But I want to talk about maths because if you are not already an Uncharted member, you can attend any one of our workshops and pay $99 a piece. Most of them are just $99. You can do it as a one-off, great and fine. However, that adds up really quick. And if you do the monthly workshop with us, and I've seen some of you there as repeat customers, which is amazing, but you could spend almost $1,200 over the course of the year doing workshops with us. Or you could pay $699 and get a 12-month membership, which means you get all of the workshops that we do at no extra charge.
You also get access to our amazing conversation in the community, our community members, and all of our community resources. And it is hopping over there. We've got conversation 24/7, we have got activities, we've got book club. We're writing our handbooks together in handbook helper group this year. We are talking about development and leadership growth, doing our development pathway this year. We are doing hallway conversations where we're talking about topics. These are sessions that are community-led, community-driven. It is topics about things that are going on in your practice that you want to talk about with your peers. All of that is happening and it's all included for your $699 membership. So simple maths, do you pay almost $1200 for the year or do you pay $699?
If you're not currently a member, you should head over to the website and use this argument to convince your boss: “Hey boss, I need to be a part of this amazing community because Stephanie told me so and because she's telling you that you will save money.” Hopefully that works, but I couldn't resist. I hope to see you at our upcoming workshops again unchartedvet.com/events for everything that's coming. And now back to the podcast.

Andy Roark:
So when we start to manage this action steps, this is just some multipart approach. This is not one where you roll in and swing for the fences. I don't know, maybe other people are better than me. There's no way I walk into this with the idea of we're going to have a meeting and this'll be over. That's a fool's game. That's not going to happen. This is a series of meetings. This is a meeting with the manager and separately, a meeting with the doctors or doctors, and then it's going to be a meeting together. And the reason it's because I'm going to need to get both of these individuals into the right head space to talk to each other. And if I don't do some pre-work to set them up to have this conversation, the whole thing's going straight in the ditch.

Stephanie Goss:
Yes, I would agree with that for sure.

Andy Roark:
So let's talk about the manager. So the manager's the one who's looking at the record and she says, “This is not up to our standard of care. I have a problem with this, I'm upset about it.” Seek first to understand. Same thing here. “What's important to you about the standard of care? You're clearly really in this. Why is this important, I want you to tell me why it's important.” And they'll think to you that you're jerking them around and “I need to understand why does this person care about the standard of care? Is it because they feel like it's important for them to know what's going on as the manager? Is it that they're worried about the perception of the staff of this happening? Is it they're worried about patient care?” I don't know what's important to them about standard of care until I ask them.
And a lot of times, we skip this step. We just start talking about the standard of care as if it is by itself important. The standard of care is just a guideline, but that guideline means things, but it means different things to different people. And it's important for different reasons to different people. And so the first question for me is, what's important about the standard of care? And I need to start to find that out. So do you agree with that as kind of an opening position?

Stephanie Goss:
I love it. Yeah.

Andy Roark:
All right, cool. So I want to talk then, and I want to start to put into the person's mind the idea. So we're talking about the standard care and we're talking about this why the standard care is important. And then what I need to generally do is introduce the idea on standard of care. I need to introduce the idea to this person that standard of care is flexible and it is highly context-dependent.

Stephanie Goss:
Sure.

Andy Roark:
Meaning now it's never okay to be negligent. We know that. However, it's never okay to be negligent, full-stop period. And there are different approaches that we take based on what we see in the exam room and also what the pet is going to allow us to do. We have all sent patients home at the end of the day that should have been hospitalized. They should have gone to the emergency clinic, but they weren't going to the emergency clinic. And we all see that. And so there's plenty of examples about standard of care. It's flexible. And I would sort of say, how do we know what's acceptable, how do we know what makes a good standard of care? And I always try to get vulnerable with people here and say, “You know what, I'm a doctor. I do a podcast for a living where I talk to people about medicine all the time, and I'm constantly learning and I'm constantly updating and things that the inflow of data is absolutely unceasing.”
And then also, spectrum of care data is really blowing up. We're starting to see a lot more coming out about more conservative treatment options and what are the outcomes with this and we didn't have that data before. And so anyway, I'll put forward when we start talking about things like that, the classic one for me was the Colorado State parvo outpatient treatment. And when I was getting trained in everything, hospitalization of parvovirus patients was absolutely critical. That's it, it had to happen. And lo and behold, we end up getting this protocol out of Colorado State that's an outpatient treatment protocol.
And only when we see the numbers do people go, “Oh wow, this is a radically different than what I anticipated the outcomes would be.” And so inpatient parvo treatment gives you about a 90% success rate. And Colorado State's outpatient parvo treatment gives you 80% success rate. So not the same. In hospitalizing inpatient does give you a higher success rate. However, I don't think many of us would say, oh, the outpatient is unacceptable, but we didn't used to know that. That's fairly new. And so anyway, I start to have some conversations about medicine changing and standards changing, and it's all sort of figuring these things out. I'm trying to get this person to recognize that the standard has some wiggle to it, and there's some reasons that we move around it, and it's not a perfect measure. And so what I'm really trying to do is set them up in a position to give the other person grace.

Stephanie Goss:
Well, and I love that. And I think the other thing as a leader, as a business owner, and as a manager that might come out of that conversation is where are the gaps in learning and potential opportunities for learning with the team. And what I mean by that is if you ask the question, how do you know what's acceptable? And the answer is, well, you said that that's what the standard is, so that's what I expect everybody to do. That's an incredible opportunity to teach not only your manager, but also probably other members of your support team about the why. And that is a huge opportunity that is only going to get identified if you ask that question. So I love starting there.

Andy Roark:
Well, and then roll that together with the why is the standard of care important– what's important about it to you? And now you've really got something, and you can see me starting to get the manager rocking just to where they're not going to be so rigid that it's right or wrong, do or die. Depending on the person and where they go, I would start with all of those things and get them to hopefully buy into the idea that this isn't as set in stone as we wish it was. It's just not. And we deserve to at least try to figure out what the other person was looking at and what they were dealing with. And then oftentimes, if I can get them to empathize, and I would love … Again, all of these things are priming this person to have another conversation. And so I want to then try to get them into empathizing a bit with the doctor.
And maybe they don't need to; maybe they're already empathizing but a lot of times just getting someone into that head space makes all the difference in the world. It's like when your kid comes home and they've had an argument at school or somebody was mean to them, and you say to them, “Well, how do you think that person was feeling?” Or “What might have made them act that way?” And it's an example, I'm trying to teach my kid empathy. I'm trying to get them to say, okay, I can understand how that person would've been mad. They shouldn't have hit me, but I also shouldn't have called them Johnny Big Teeth.

Stephanie Goss:
Great.

Andy Roark:
Or whatever. I get it. I said, “But I get it. I understand why that would make him mad.” And again, it is trying to get that. So the same questions I start to have with the manager, and this is not a punitive conversation, it is a hundred percent an empathy conversation, but I'm going to try to get them to think about, Hey, if you were a doctor and the staff was looking up to you and the manager came in and started challenging your medical decisions, how would you feel? What emotions do you think you would feel? And this is just us talking, “Getting ready to go talk to Dr. Smith, but what do you think Dr. Smith's emotions are?” And just get them to hear, “Well, I'd be embarrassed, and I would feel like I'm not being supported.” Totally. Those are all emotions Dr. Smith has. And again, this is me talking somebody else into a healthy head space to go have this conversation.
So, anyway. And then the last part too is I would start to talk about some consequences of what are the downsides of conflict like this that we want to try to mitigate. So for example, if these are things that are happening and the staff is aware of them, I'm worried because here I've got my doctors, and I want to build a workplace that's built on trust. I want my techs to trust my doctors.

Stephanie Goss:
Of course.

Andy Roark:
I want my doctors who trust my techs. I want everybody to trust our team manager, and our manager to trust everybody on the team. And so undermining the doctor credibility and unless we have a really, really, really, really good reason to, is generally a bad idea. And I don't want to undermine the trust that the staff has in this doctor. Definitely not until we get to talk about what happened and where are we, you know what I mean? And again, I can't change what happened yesterday. We can only go forward. And I feel like here at the end, I should go back and put the statement in. I feel like I've tried of made this point, but just to be totally clear, I'm not talking about a doctor being negligent or doing awful things. I'm 100% talking here about a disagreement over standard of care that is well above negligence, but not what our stated standard is for this hospital.

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah. A common example that I can think of is … So, the standard of care for a diabetic patient is we're going to do a full glucose curve and an exam, and you have a set … this is what we're going to do and this is how frequently we're going to do it. And then the patient comes in for the exam. And to your point, the doctor takes in all of the information in the exam room, they take in the info from the owner, and then they make a decision that deviates from that standard of care. Maybe it's doing a mini curve instead of a full curve, or maybe it's sending them home to do a curve at home versus doing it in the hospital.

Andy Roark:
They didn't do an exam because they did an exam three days ago or last week.

Stephanie Goss:
When they were here for an ear infection. And so they were just like, “It's fine.” But it's one of those things that's a deviation that someone is like, “There's a reason why we say that we're going to do it this way.” And that is 100% true. It is also a hundred percent true that the doctor's job is to take all of that information and make decisions with it. And so that's why you're in this middle ground. You are right, and they are right. And now I need to figure out a way for us to work together so that nobody feels like they were wrong here because you're both doing what you're supposed to be doing. And veterinary medicine is about the shades of gray. And there are always going to be times where the doctor says, I'm going to do this instead of this time, or I'm going to make this decision. Or as a manager, I'm going to make this exception for customer service. We live in a world of gray.
And so that's where, to your point, getting them to put their empathy shoes on and imagine, ask themselves a question, what else could this mean, what else could they have been thinking, why else could they have made this decision even if they can't get themselves to have empathy … because I've been in situations where someone has been so fired up and so hacked off that if I ask them, “Could you imagine how they could have been feeling when you called them Johnny Big teeth,” they're going to be like, “Screw you.”

Andy Roark:
That's sticking now. Now that we're using it, that kid's Johnny Big Teeth forever.

Stephanie Goss:
They're like, “No, he couldn't have been feeling anything else except for my fist before I put it in his face.” But there is still a way to get them to feel the empathy. And so if that lever doesn't work, getting them to ask the questions about what else could this be about because we live in a world of gray in veterinary medicine, and there are … That is the job as a manager, that is also the job as a doctor, is to make those game time decisions. And it doesn't matter whether you're a practice owner working with a practice manager, whether you're an associate doctor working with a technician. We have to be able to lead the practice, whether we're leading for our patients in the moment in the exam room, or we're leading the team in front of everybody at a team meeting, we have to be able to lead and do our jobs knowing that we trust each other as a team.
And so we have to come to that place of common ground. And so your job as the middle ground person is to figure out how to get them to find that common ground and acknowledge the fact that you're both doing your jobs. No one is wrong. And we still have to find the shades that talk through the shades of gray hair.

Andy Roark:
Yeah, I completely agree. I just had a recollection of … I got in trouble for this one time of sort of a standard of care thing like this where it was like, I had this little miniature schnauzer and it had a bad corneal ulcer. So one of his eyes, and I don't remember which eye or anything … it was a bad corneal ulcer and that thing was not getting better. And I was wrestling with it and wrestling with it. And I had this, and the lady was this wonderful sweet old lady, but I had her coming in every five to seven days and I was restaining it. And every time she came in, it was our policy at the hospital to charge a recheck exam and to do it. And finally, after four or five times, I said, “All right, well, I'll see you back again.”
And she was like, “Dr. Roark, I think you're so great. Are you going to charge me $100 again today for this?” And I couldn't do it. And I was like, [inaudible 00:50:46]. At this point, I knew exactly what I was looking for. The dog didn't need a full physical exam, I just needed to get that eye stained. And she was wonderful. And she said that to me, and I stopped charging for those exams because I was like, Nope, she's going to come in. I'm going to stain her eye. We're going to see where we're doing, we're going to make adjustments and she's going to go. But she was so wonderful. And again, I understand that some people would be like, no, Andy, you can't do that. You should have charged her a hundred bucks every time. And was it the fact that she was a sweet little old lady? Yeah, that probably had something to do with it. Yeah, it probably did.
And again, but if you sat me down and … And they did. The management said something to me about, Hey, it's not standard of care to do this.

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah, how can you do this.

Andy Roark:
And I kind of said, “I hear that; I'm not going to do it.” And I told them. And again, it was one of those things too where I said, “You guys know me. You know that I take care of my cases, and I work up my cases, and this is rare. But in this case, I feel that this is warranted to be able to continue to give this person the care that they need for their pet.” And again, it was a one-off; it was not a common thing, but again, that was a thing where they said, “No, our standard of care is a recheck examination and a fluorescein stain.” And I was just like, “Come and look at this chart with me. Let's see what we're looking at here.” Anyway.

Stephanie Goss:
Well, you're talking about the why, right? So you have to do that with the manager, but then you also have to have the conversation with the doctor because you got to prime that pump, too.

Andy Roark:
I agree. So let's talk it through. So all of that stuff is the things I'm trying to do to get the manager ready and empathetic and open to having the conversation. And so then you got anything else you would say to the manager or are you feeling pretty good.

Stephanie Goss:
No, I feel good about that.

Andy Roark:
Okay. All right. Cool. So then we go to the doctors. The big things that I want to talk about where the doctors is, this is all much healthier if I can frame it as a forward-facing conversation of like, Hey guys, let's talk about medical standards. How do we want to set our medical standards, how do we want to get the team on board with these? Really, a lot of it is a temperature check on where your doctor's about medical standards. And if you have a team that generally agrees that medical standards are good and important, then we're going to start with the understanding that, hey, medical standards are important. If we have a team of doctors that all want to do it their own way and they don't agree about having consistency across the practice, we're going to step backwards, and we're going to do it.
Just know that it's going to increase the timeline it's going to take us to get to where we want to be. And that's okay. Be kind to yourself, be patient with yourself. The first thing we're going to have to do is get everybody to agree that it's important for us to be consistent, and we're going to have to talk to them about why consistency is important, and we're going to have to sell them on the fact that their jobs are going to be easier because the staff will be able to help them more when they know what we're doing and how we're doing it. And we're going to have to tell them we're going to do better medicine and they'll be better patient care and they'll make more money, or whatever their motivators are, we're going to have to get them to buy into a consistent approach across the board.
So that's the first part. And then after we get them to buy in for the needs of a consistent approach, then we're going to have to have the conversation with them about how do we set these medical standards. And that's sort of the conversation that we're going to need to have.

Stephanie Goss:
The only other thing that I would say about the doctors is that I would probably try and do some poking to get them to maybe … especially if there had been already disagreement and emotions, I would probably do some poking to try and get them to unpack the stories they might be telling themselves in their head when somebody who is non-medical staff is questioning, or even if it was a technician who has license is questioning a decision that they made. I would probably try one-on-one before we have the other conversation, get them to poke at that because if I can get them to be vulnerable, if I can get them to acknowledge to the other person, “Hey, when you ask me the question like this, this is the thoughts that went through my head,” I can help set the stage for the empathy to pour out and for the other party to say, “Oh my gosh, that was not what I meant, I never would have wanted you to feel that way.”
So I would probably do some digging with them to try and unpack what are the stories that they might be telling themselves in their head.

Andy Roark:
Yeah, I agree. If there's a specific case where it's this specific type of case where there's a disagreement, and especially if it was based on something that happened last week, I would do the same thing I would do with the manager of assuming good intent, seeking to understand what happened with this case, “walk me through this, walk me through what's going on,” stuff like that.
And then I think it's good to talk to your doctors, not at this time, not about this, but at some point separately talking to the doctors and saying, Hey guys, we've got our medical standards. How do you all want to be made aware of questions about our medical standards?

Stephanie Goss:
Sure. Yeah.

Andy Roark:
And I would say it to the group so that no one feels targeted out. Like, “Hey, Stephanie Goss. If a person has a problem with your medicine, how do you want to find out about that?” It's not that. It's just, Hey guys, the … So now it's presented as education is constant, standards are always changing, the staff wants to know what's going on. If they have questions, I want them to have-

Stephanie Goss:
They need a process.

Andy Roark:
… the ability to ask. And so I'm going to have them. Any of those questions will come up to us, how do you want me to ask you guys about that? Is this a phone call? Do you want me to do it in our one-on-ones? How do you guys want to want to hear about that? And by talking to all the doctors at the same time, I'm setting the expectation that this is a thing that's probably going to happen and it's going to happen to any of you. And it's not bad, it's just they're going to have questions. And so that if and when it happens, it doesn't feel like this horrible, nightmare, scary scenario.
And the last thing I would say is, great guys, we're going to work together on our standards, and I want to keep those things up to date with you guys. What is the best way for us to educate the staff about what our standards are? How do we want to communicate these things so that people know what to expect and how to best support you guys? And those are the types of questions.
Again, what I'm trying to do here is to get the doctor or the doctors into this head space of, Hey, medical standards are important, and the staff cares about medical standards and they're going to have questions about medical standards. And we are a collaborative team who talks through things like that. How do you want to participate in those things? How are we going to send good communication down the chain? And how are we going to receive questions coming up the chain? Because this is how we work together to make sure our hospital continues to function well, and everybody feels good about what we're doing.
And again, all of this is happening before I put the manager and the doctor or the doctors together. This is all priming the pump.

Stephanie Goss:
Okay. So we have meetings with them all separately, and then we've got to get them all on the same page.

Andy Roark:
Yeah. So we got to get them all on the same page. So bringing it sort of together, I'm a big believer that it's probably best if we have medical concerns to have them go through a medical director. And if we don't have a medical director at all, I think that that may be a problem. It's very dicey for the manager to walk in and drop medical concerns on the doctors. I think that's really hard. Part of my setup for this would be … I think this is where you use your medical director is those complaints and concerns should come to the medical director. That way it's almost like a peer reviewing the case and someone who's got some perspective of being in that situation and has some letters behind their name to carry weight of bringing it in. Oftentimes they may be able to add some context that affects how this is presented.
But I really do think working through your medical director is going to be the way to go. And then going into this, if we're going to have this group conversation, we say we're going to sit down with the doctors to talk about what our standard of care is going forward, or making adjustments or things like that. For God sake, start with commonality. And I think you touched on this at the very beginning. Like, what do we all believe in, what are we all trying to accomplish, what do we all think is important, what are we doing here? And I think if we lay down the commonality, what we're all in, we're all looking to do the best for the pets, we're all looking to do a good job, we're all looking to make sure that we make a positive impact in the world, we're all looking to feel like we're making impact day to day on our patients, us, the support staff, the pet owners, we're all doing this.
Now let's talk about standards for all of us so that we can all feel good about this. So start with commonality first, and then start to lay out the spectrum of what guidelines look like. There's a lot of flexibility in what we can do with guidelines. And so I often like to frame the spectrum to show the absurd extremes because it makes people feel not so far away. So for example, I would come in, I would start to have this conversation. I would say something like, “Hey, look, we do not want to have a zero consistency practice wild west. Everybody's free styling. The patient experience, the pet owner experience is radically different every time they come in. Nobody knows what we're doing or why we're doing it. The techs don't trust the doctors. We are not going to have that kind of practice. We are not. We're also not going to have a practice where we dump patients out in the street without any treatment because their owners can't or wouldn't pay for this set standard of care that we chiseled into a piece of stone. We're going to recognize that pet owners are out of our control. The pets are out of our control. And sometimes we have to adjust to the situation to get the best care possible and to protect the relationships that we have. So we're not dumping people out on the street if they're not willing to do everything we recommend. We're also not running a wild west show where everybody's just shooting it out over each case about what we're going to do and what we're not going to do. Let's get somewhere in between those extremes where we all feel good.”
I like that style of setting down two ridiculous extremes, and people go, “Well, obviously, we're not going to dump people on the street,” but what I'm trying to do is to get the people who like rules and who like to see right and wrong. If I set that down just as a joking way, just like I just did it, it frames the issue to say, there's not a right answer, there's a spectrum, and we are picking a space in that spectrum, and that takes a lot of the no subcutaneous fluids are in, or they are out. It's like, no, look, we're trying to land here in the middle. So anyway, I can lower the stakes a little bit and take away that right or wrong mentality. So I try to set it up that way. But that's the big thing.
And the last thing is focus on the future, not the past. Let's talk about what we want to do next time. And some of this stuff is going to be picking a hill and making it beautiful. I tell a story sometimes when I started landscaping, I didn't know where to start because I was just overwhelmed, and my dad told me to pick a hill and make it beautiful, and then pick another hill and make it beautiful. In a couple years, you're going to have something great.
And so a lot of times in management, you just pick a hill. You're not going to create standards for your whole practice in a week. if there's a thing and there's an issue, let's work on that. We're going to work on nutrition recommendations, and then we're going to work on pain control, and then we're going to work on dental standards, and we're going to keep going. And people say it's going to take years. And I'm going to say, you know what, you got years. This is going to be a lifelong process. And then here's the thing, when you get done, it'll be time to start over again and remake the first ones. So that's that. That's all I got.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh, that's where you choose to end.

Andy Roark:
That's it. That's all I got. All right.

Stephanie Goss:
That was a good one.

Andy Roark:
I just ran because we were getting long. Stuff was getting along. We got to get out of here. So I talked us all the way out.

Stephanie Goss:
You talked us out. No, that's great. I love it. I think that's a wrap.

Andy Roark:
Cool man. All right. Thanks for doing this with me. Thanks everybody.

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah, have a great week, everybody.
Well, that's a wrap on another episode of the podcast. And as always, this was so fun to dive into the mail bag and answer this question. And I would really love to see more things like this come through the mail bag. If there is something that you would love to have a talk about on the podcast or a question that you are hoping that we might be able to help with, feel free to reach out and send us a message.
You can always find the mail bag at the website. The address is unchartedvet.com/mailbag, or you can email us at podcastunchartedvet.com.
Take care of everybody, and have a great week. We'll see you again next time.

Written by Dustin Bays · Categorized: Blog, Podcast · Tagged: culture, doctor, management, Practice ownership, Vet Tech

May 08 2023

The Future of Financing Pet Healthcare

Uncharted Veterinary Podcast Episode 230 Cover Image

This week on the podcast…

Jonathan Wainberg joins Dr. Andy Roark to discuss how lending and insurance will play a role in pet owners affording veterinary care in the coming years. The discussion covers current trends in pet owner spending on wellness, best practices for communicating cost of care, and where the lending and pet insurance markets may be going in the coming years.

This episode is made possible ad-free by CareCredit credit card. For more information about helping pet owners in your practice pay for care or access pet insurance for their furry family members, check out the CareCredit website or the Pets Best Pet Insurance website, both Synchrony solutions.

Uncharted Veterinary Podcast · UVP – 230 – The Future Of Financing Pet Healthcare

You can also listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music or wherever you get your podcasts.

Carecredit logo

This episode is made possible ad-free by CareCredit credit card. For more information about helping pet owners in your practice pay for care or access pet insurance for their furry family members, check out the CareCredit website or the Pets Best Pet Insurance website, both Synchrony solutions.

ABOUT OUR GUEST:

Jonathan Wainberg General Manager, Senior Vice President, Pet

Jonathan Wainberg brings over 15 years of financial services expertise, and a record of commercial ingenuity, market expansion and energetic leadership driving revenue growth to his role as CareCredit’s General Manager, Senior Vice President, Pet. In this newly established vertical, Jonathan will lead CareCredit’s expansion of the veterinarian credit business, pet insurance and additional market adjacencies.

Prior to this, Jonathan served as SVP, General Manager GAP. He joined Synchrony following a 15-year tenure with GE Capital, where he was the Senior Managing Director, Global Sales for Industrial Finance in London. He was a key member of the senior leadership team that reorganized and streamlined GE Capital. Jonathan developed the strategy and led the efforts that allowed GE to provide financing support to global customers in new markets, surpassing sales targets by more than 30%. With on-the-ground roles in the US, Europe and Asia, he’s managed teams around the world and delivered complex strategies in more than 50 countries.

Earlier, Jonathan joined GE Capital in Corporate Finance in New York, ultimately becoming Managing Director, responsible for the Eastern US, Canada and private equity firms, in 2012. As Managing Director, Jonathan originated, structured and negotiated leveraged loans and highly structured financings for leveraged buyouts, re-financings, expansions and restructurings of middle market and large cap retail companies. He was a top individual sales contributor from 2007-2010.

Jonathan has an MBA from Georgetown University and a BA in History with a concentration in Marketing from Concordia University in Montreal, Canada. He began his career in the executive training program at Macy’s in New York, where he also had various merchant/management roles.

Jonathan is a native of Canada, with a dual US-Canada citizenship. He has traveled to over 85 counties, enjoys entertaining, wine and playing with his energetic 2-year-old son.

While based in Costa Mesa, Jonathan currently resides in Bal Harbour, Florida with his wife and son, Jonathan will relocate to Southern California soon.

We want to hear about your challenges and would love to feature your scenario on the podcast.

Submit it here: unchartedvet.com/mailbag


Episode Resources

Language That Works Infographic: https://www.carecredit.com/sites/pc/pdf/speak-pet-owner-healthier-pets.pdf

Uncharted upcoming events: unchartedvet.com/upcoming-events/


Episode Transcript

Andy Roark:

Welcome everybody to The Uncharted Veterinary Podcast. Guys, I am your host, Dr. Andy Roark. Guys, I got a special bonus episode for you today with the one and only Jonathan Wainberg. For those who don't know Jonathan or didn't hear him on a previous episode, he is Senior Vice President for Synchrony, working with teams at CareCredit and Pets Best, both Synchrony solutions. Guys, he's got his finger absolutely on the pulse of what is happening in finance, in vet medicine, and that's what we're going to be talking about today is keeping care affordable. What does the future look like for pet owners paying for vet medicine? Guys, this is a sprawling conversation to ask him about where he sees the industry going, where lending is going, things like that. He's got a lot of ideas. I found it really, really interesting. So guys, without further ado, let's get into this episode and this episode as a bonus is brought to you ad free by CareCredit.

Speaker 1:

And now, The Uncharted Podcast.

Andy Roark:

And we are back. It's me, Dr. Andy Roark and my friend Jonathan Wainberg. How are you?

Jonathan Wainberg:

I'm doing great. I'm just happy to have been invited back to one of your podcasts. I thought for sure on my first one, I tanked it, but listen, I'll take it.

Andy Roark:

The exact opposite. No, I appreciate you being here. For those who don't know, you are the Senior Vice President and General Manager of Pets at Synchrony, which encompasses CareCredit and Pets Best pet insurance. Yeah. So I wanted to have you on today to talk to you a little bit about the finances of this profession and the economy in general and where things are going from an economic standpoint in our profession. I think that you have an interesting perspective on this because of your involvement with both CareCredit and Pets Best. Can you go ahead and start at a high level of when you look at the economy at large and we're seeing rising inflation and things like that, where do you see our economy going and then how do you see the economy of veterinary medicine going forward?

Jonathan Wainberg:

Yeah, no, and thanks for having me. And this topic is so important now given everything that's going on in the economy, but just a headline news, we're living this day to day and so it is something that is important for us to discuss. And I think the last time you had me on, we talked about lifetime of care and all the costs associated with pet wellness. Listen, things have changed so much in the last six months and I think it's great that we're here to talk about that. Quite frankly, I think financing and financing solutions and flexible means of payment are going to become even more important as people do unfortunately struggle with some of the changes in the economy, whether it has to do with employment issues or interest rate issues with some of the other expenses going up, and we need to be prepared for that.

Andy Roark:

Yeah. Helping people pay for care is a problem that's not going to go away. If anything, it seems to me obvious that that's going to be a bigger and bigger part of what our jobs are going to be. I was thinking recently, one of the things that landed on me was emergency pyometra on the weekend, and this was a dog that was pretty healthy on Thursday and Friday and then they're at the vet clinic on Saturday with this emergency procedure. It's a $6,000 surgery to get it done, and I understand the economics of that and I understand why it costs what it costs.

At the same time as a pet owner, you look around and you go, “Man, I don't know a lot of people with six grand laying around that they're like, ‘This is not a problem.'” In the vein of sticker shock, I guess, is there messaging that you would like to see from a professional level? Should we be doing things to try to make people more aware of financial planning for pets? ‘Cause I think that's what you and I are ultimately going to end up talking about is, what is financial payment planning for pets, and then how do we encourage people who are pet owners who are generally just going about their lives, they have no idea what medicine costs. How do we get those guys into that headspace?

Jonathan Wainberg:

Yeah, no, I think… And this is the audience that we need to be talking to because they bear the brunt. This is the first line, right, your vet professionals and listening to this and the people that have to assess the health but then provide a treatment plan and show them. So a couple of things we've done, we've partnered with the AVMA on a study language of care, and I have it here in front of me, can't see it obviously on the podcast, but talks to best practices on things to say, and words do matter when you are communicating to pet parents, right. If we think about a term that we like to use in the industry preventative, well that doesn't resonate so much with our pet parents. Something like routine or checkup does much more for that.

And so it's little changes like that to think about, okay, how do we get people just getting more involved in first part compliance of care, wellness of care, because we know that just like humans, pets, if you provide them the standard care, are probably going to live a longer life and a healthier life and a happier life and not have those acute experiences perhaps as much. So try to reduce that. When you think about the financing element of it, we are there's language there as well where don't avoid the conversation, but talk about it in the right way. Address the elephant in the air in the room, right. People are so… The human animal bond relationship has grown so strong over the last few decades that people are willing to spend much more for the health of their family members or pet family members.

And so just preparing them upfront is integral. And so it starts when you… At the puppy stage, right. And you see some expenses, kind of jump up and talk to them about insurance, talk to them about CareCredit and tools that they should have. Because ultimately, as much as we like to plan, there are going to be surprises. Dogs and cats and [inaudible 00:06:34] companion animals, we don't know exactly what's going to happen and so we just got to make sure that we're prepared for the unexpected.

Andy Roark:

Yeah. I want you to expand on that a little bit. Talk to me about best practices inside the vet clinic that you see.

Jonathan Wainberg:

Yeah, I think it's having that open dialogue, right. And it's not an easy kind of conversation, but we need to shift the way the veterinarian teams communicate with their pet owners and perceptions about the value and the importance of veterinary care, right. And offering personalized recommendations. Use language vets reassuring about clients. 53% of pet owners want to hear recommendations from their vet owners and they don't want to be blindsided. We know that that came out of a study that we did from AVMA. They appreciate it. The veterinarian and the hospital managers and the vet techs, they are the most trusted resource for anything to do with your pet.

And so we need to work with our vet provider networks and the vet community to be able to have that open dialogue, talk about some of the costs that you can expect to spend. So just so you know, a first year pet ownership for a cat can range from about a $1,000 to $2,500. Dogs even more. Talk about those different courses of treatments and what people can expect and to some degree put together a plan of care when they're at that young age, or even if they then have some sort of acute need and a high ticket surprise, that's the ever time to say, “Well, let's make this just a onetime occurrence so that you're not caught off guard again.”

Andy Roark:

Yeah, that totally makes sense to me. So sign posting early on. I think that makes a lot of sense. I'm going to link to the lifetime of care study that you referenced. So you were on last time we talked about the $45,000 cat. And still I think that's such a powerful study just because you say that $45,000 cat and it blows people's minds and you can say, “Oh no, over the life of an animal, especially an animal that has some health problems, we can get up into these extremely high numbers.”

Jonathan Wainberg:

It's interesting, and it is. And I think in one of the interviews with one of the publications, we talked about a dog or $55,000. You say, “Lifetime care of a dog.” Someone says, “That's a very nice car.” And not to be crass about it, 'cause I take my dog over a $55,000 car any day of the week.

Andy Roark:

Of course.

Jonathan Wainberg:

She probably can't get me where I need to get to, but when you think about… She's a miniature poodle, I can't-

Andy Roark:

[inaudible 00:09:27] that small. Yeah, I get.

Jonathan Wainberg:

No, yeah, no, I don't think so. And pretty much now that she's 12, I'm spending more time carrying her than she is walk… But what I'd say is I think about that example, and it's an interesting example and I'd like your point of view on this. I go back to, well you have a $55,000 car, let's use that as an example. Well yeah, you got to provide that car with the right amount of maintenance. You don't just go to the shop or change the oil, you know, you don't change it… And then when you get an accident, you finally take care of it. No, you have to throughout that lifetime provide that care. And I know that that is something that our industry really tries to work with our patients on whatever it is, wellness and routine visits.

Well, in this study, and we didn't really get into it, but part of me is convinced that to some degree your pet within some standard deviation, it's going to cost the same amount. The question is, it's over how many years, right. So your pet is going to live longer if you give them that good care over the course of that life and they're going to be happier and healthier and a better companion and part of that family. And that that's something that really stuck out to me when I was looking deeper into the numbers and thinking about it with my own experience.

Andy Roark:

Yeah. I've gone back and forth on this. I really do think that we need to get these numbers out in front of people, right. For them to… How many of our pet owners have the realization of what it costs to have a pet, like, as the time that they're seeing a quote for an emergency procedure or something like that, and that's not how we want people to learn. And then I think part of it's, I'm not callous, I believe the human animal bond. And you see that the health benefits and the wellness benefits of having pets and things, we need to figure out ways to make this affordable so that people will continue to have pets and they're not a luxury. But it's always that balance.

Jonathan Wainberg:

You're absolutely right. Just having these numbers of the study in front of me, right. 38% of cat owners thought they were ready for a pet expense, but they weren't, right. And so if you think about that, that's 60% basically, 62% didn't, right. And that's a big, big number. And it's not dissimilar in the canine space, right, and so we got to keep banging this drum because the more we talk about it, the more people are going to be prepared and the more they'll be more proactive. Because the last thing you want to do is have to, you know, when you're dealing with the stress of an emergency of your family dog, your family cat, even in the equine space, the last thing you want to be thinking about is making a choice between cost or care, right. You want to be prepared upfront for that. And that's where being educated and educating your pet parent clients in the veterinary industry is so critical.

Andy Roark:

Yeah, I'm not surprised by the number as far as number of people who think that they're prepared and then they're not. I really think that there's a perception problem about veterinary care and what it costs. I think people have got anchored in their mind, you know, cost from 20 years ago and I go, man, there's been significant changes in where we are. So I see pet owners all the time that seem to be just caught by that. I guess that goes back to my earlier question when I talked about setting expectations and things. It's just something I think about. I think people don't get frustrated as much about things that they're not surprised by as they do when they're caught off guard, meaning what they expect to pay. If they expect to pay what it costs. They're generally okay, and it's a frustration and a challenge, but we hope to get the emotion is when they expect to pay much less than what it turns out to be.

And now they say, I'm wildly unprepared. And also I think all of us have had this problem of when pet owners feel like they don't have any options, they don't know how they're going to pay for this, suddenly it becomes a much more dire and emotional situation. And so I think that that's sort of where I was going earlier on when I was saying how do we normalize this? So let me circle back around to that and just sort of say, how do we normalize financial planning or even borrowing money for care as like, “Hey, this is a thing that happens.” I think a lot of people are still surprised that there are companies like CareCredit that exists for this purpose. How do we let people know about that ahead of time and make that sort of a more normal part of the conversation?

Jonathan Wainberg:

Yeah. We've tried to make it as easy as possible. We're accepting in about 85% of the vet practices in the US and so it's been around a long time CareCredit's been through all the cycles, it's something that is trusted and we have an incredible amount of network with millions of cardholders just in the veterinary space. I think… Listen, we believe that when someone gets a puppy or adopts a rescue, they should be presented with options of insurance, right for us Pets Best and as well as finance. And I think you're spot on about expectations and surprises and being scared off by stuff. So it's so important to talk about this upfront to get people to enroll. So it's a great tool. It works… And the great thing about CareCredit is it doesn't only work in the veterinarian channel, it works in other areas. So a lot of people actually have the CareCredit card in their pocket but may not know that it's accepted in that vet practice 'cause maybe they took it out for their kid's orthodontistry or if they had a laser surgery on their eyes, and that card has that inter-flexibility.

And the great thing about CareCredit is that unlike a lot of these buy now pay later products, it's something that you could reuse. It's a dedicated line of credit. We're a regulated bank, we have all the reserves, you know that we're here. We've been in the industry for 27 years. You know that you have that support. So by us having both Pets Best and CareCredit, you have different choices on how you can manage and prepare for those decisions. But ultimately, the thing I also want to point out, because I know we got a lot of vet professionals in your audience, I think that's our main target audience in this forum is it's also good business for the practice. You don't want to be taking on debts, your job and thank God it is your job and we're so lucky to have an industry where people are so passionate about caring for our animals and all the trials and tribulations that go with that.

But your job is not to be a bank. Your job is not to be a financing solution and you don't want to have receivables from clients. ‘Cause imagine how much harder that conversation is if they owe you money. How much harder it's for your cash flow and for your practices' financials if you're not getting that money. Whereas if CareCredit has it, you get it in that short amount of time. You don't have to damage or have those tough conversations with your clients on bad debts and stuff like that. We don't like to have those conversations either, but that is our job. We ultimately, if it comes to that, which we hope it isn't, but then we also have programs and practices to help people that perhaps could manage that in a more efficient way.

So I think that's also super important for people to think through as we go through a more challenging economic period. It's not just the owner or pet parent, it's also the practice. And all of you in the profession need to make sure that you're taken care of yourself as well. And this is one easy way to do it because I come from a family of doctors, I could say this, right. I've been blessed to have people in my family that are so passionate and it's in human health, but passionate about their clients. But you talk to them about the business part of that element and thankfully, to some degree, it's a secondary part because we need them focusing on the clinical part, and you shouldn't have that be a worry.

Andy Roark:

Well, the optics of vets shaking people down for debt is awful. I mean, it does not look good. It doesn't feel good in a world of social media where people can see your practice and your practice brand is out there and you want people to buy it and trust you. It looks awful and it feels awful for us to be like, “Hey, where's that money that you owe us?” You don't want any part of this. So that's a big part of it. The other part of it for me is staying in that optics vein and we look at social media and the way of the world these days.

I think if we're going to continue to be a trusted resource and to be able to stand out there and say, “Hey, we care about your pets and we value your pets.” We've got to continue to find ways to make care accessible and at least to give people options. So we say, “Hey, we're trying our best. We're giving people options on how they can make this possible.” We just don't want to have the image of people who say, “Yeah, we love your pets like family. You owe us this money and you better come up with cash in hand.” That's not who we are and none of us want it. And so I look a lot at that and say, “I don't want that in our future.”

Jonathan Wainberg:

No. And as that lifetime of care study showed and our a AVMA study that we partnered with the AVMA with, the veterinarian and the staff of the veterinarians are the most trusted resource and that relationship is everything. And you don't want anything coming in between that. Obviously we're fortunate to have those in the profession that are so dedicated to the space. But if there's something that can take away from any tension in that relationship, and we know that finance is not an easy conversation to have, but doing it early and then putting the… I wouldn't say the burden, right, 'cause it's our job, but at least removing that burden from you on that sort of financing and receivable side to a company that specializes in it makes sense. And it's almost, in my opinion, not worth the while to get into it. And there's just too much receivables in that space that it's just almost self-inflicted pain. I hate to say it.

Andy Roark:

Yeah, no, I get that. When you look into your crystal ball, Jonathan, you look ahead five years, what, what's patient care finance look like? What's different in five years than it is today? Are you predicting significant increases to the number of people who have pet insurance? Are there different financial products that we're not seeing yet or we're just starting to see, help me see the future of this?

Jonathan Wainberg:

Yeah, listen, I think pet insurance penetration is going to increase in the US. We're about 3% now in the US, but that's still very small. Is it going to get to the levels where in the UK it's 25% and in parts of the continent, even higher, European continent even higher? No, I don't think so because I think there's major cultural differences between the insurance experience, not necessarily pet insurance, but just general insurance experience in the US versus Europe and socialized medicine and stuff like that. And I know in Sweden there's certain pet kind of responsibilities that the government puts on as a pet owner that makes insurance something that's a lot stickier, making it claims automation. So you're making it quicker, making it easier for medical records to be uploaded. I think the other part of that is the app experience and the online experience very digitally native, which we know in our industry, and it is probably not where we stand out as being the most technologically advanced in our practice management systems and so on.

So working together with some of those partners to make that easier. I do also see, I don't think credit's going away. I think there's a place for both. And what I'm thinking is I think there's going to be a place where those two products work even more closely together, right. And how you can reduce the out-of-pocket experience in the short term while you're waiting to be reimbursed or even quicker reimbursement even at the time of care are things that, hey, how do we go and operationalize that and commercialize that as something that that's very important. So it's going to play a bigger role, and so these financial tools are going to continue to be prevalent.

Andy Roark:

Yeah. You got me thinking about what's possible. That's interesting. That's what I wanted. So I'm going to go ahead in the show notes. Guys, I'm going to link to the pet lifetime of care study that we referenced a couple of times. I'm going to link to the AVMA CareCredit collaboration, the Language of Care, which has got some really interesting things about setting expectations when talking to pet owners about finance and money, which I like a lot. Jonathan, for people who want more information, they're like, “Hey, I want to understand third party payments more. I want to understand Pets Best pet insurance, what resources do you like for them?

Jonathan Wainberg:

Of course, I'd say carecredit.com is a great place to start. You'll see there's a toggle that you can either choose as a patient or as a provider, right. And then there's sub sites on the industry, so obviously you click on the veterinarian space. You can also find a link there to Pets Best, but you go to petsbest.com directly also, to look more into insurance and how that works. What I can tell you is that people that have CareCredit and people that have Pets Best, we know for a fact that they have a better compliance of care for their pets than those that don't.

And so it is an important thing out there. We all have the same goal. We're all aligned here in A, making sure that your clients and your patients have that compliance of care and the best care and the best lifetime that they can, we want to help provide on the financial side that flexibility and that safety net that can enable them to do that. And so it all comes back to preparation, communication, and that relationship that you guys have is our strongest resource.

Andy Roark:

Yeah. No, that totally makes sense. Jonathan, thank you so much for being here, guys. I'll put links to the show notes for all these things down below. Take care of yourselves, everybody. We'll talk to you soon.

And that's it, guys. That's what I got for you. I hope you enjoyed it. I hope you got something out of it. Thanks to Jonathan for being here with us guys. Guys, I always enjoy these high level conversations, sort of predicting the future and looking at trends inside the industry. If you do, stick around. We're back every week. Come check out some more episodes. This is a Monday episode. I have another Uncharted Vet episode with the one and only practice management goddess Stephanie Goss coming out on Wednesday. I'd love to see you there. Take care everybody. Talk to you later. Bye.

Written by Dustin Bays · Categorized: Blog, Podcast · Tagged: behavior, culture, fatigue, management

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 20
  • Go to Next Page »
  • Membership
  • Account
  • Cart
  • Privacy

Copyright © 2026 UNCHARTED VETERINARY CONFERENCE | WEBSITE BY OFFICETHUG