• Skip to main content

Uncharted Veterinary Conference

Revolutionary veterinary marketing & business conference for those forging their own paths and telling their own stories.

  • Account
    • Log In/Out
  •  

doctor

Feb 14 2024

When The Vet Won’t GO FASTER

This week on the Uncharted Podcast, Dr. Andy Roark is joined by veterinary practice management expert, Dr. Amanda Donnelly and together they tackle another question from the mailbag. In this episode, they take on the challenge of a veterinarian who, despite being exceptional with clients and production, struggles with efficiency in exam rooms, causing a backlog of duties. This backlog bleeds into other doctor's plates, having to have them finish his work yet the practice owner is hesitant to discipline for fear of losing this veterinarian. Dr. Amanda Donnelly offers her insight to strategize ways to set clearer job expectations, foster self-reflection, and provide effective feedback. Together, they explore external resources like mentorship programs and leadership coaching to enhance the vet's performance. Let's get into this….

Uncharted Veterinary Podcast · UVP – 273 – When The Vet Won't GO FASTER

You can also listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music or wherever you get your podcasts.

Do you have something that you would love Andy and Stephanie to roleplay on the podcast – a situation where you would love some examples of what someone else would say and how they would say it? If so, send us a message through the mailbag! We want to hear your challenges and would love to feature your scenario on the podcast.

Submit your questions here: unchartedvet.com/mailbag


Upcoming Events

📚 Explore more about the book and veterinary leadership on Dr. Amanda Donnelly's official website: AmandaDonnellyDVM.com Dive into the world of veterinary leadership with Dr. Amanda Donnelly's insightful book, “Leading & Managing Veterinary Teams.” This definitive guide explores the essential principles of effective leadership in veterinary medicine. Discover practical strategies and valuable insights to elevate your team management skills. 🔗 Get your copy on Amazon: Leading & Managing Veterinary Teams

ABOUT OUR GUEST:

Dr. Amanda Donnelly, a speaker, consultant, and author with over 30 years’ experience in the veterinary profession. She is a second-generation veterinarian who combines her practice experience and business expertise to help practice leaders communicate better with their teams and clients. Dr. Donnelly is a graduate of the College of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Missouri.  She is the author of Leading and Managing Veterinary Teams and writes the Talk the Talk communication column for Today’s Veterinary Business. Dr. Donnelly has won many accolades including being named the 2023 Practice Management Educator of the Year for WVC.

⚓ Join us at the Practice Manager Summit – a virtual event designed to tackle the unique challenges faced by practice managers. Dive into interactive workshop sessions, peer discussion segments, and experience the energy of Uncharted events firsthand!

✨ Explore sessions on managing team conflicts, enhancing team retention and setting boundaries in a management role.

✨ Connect with fellow practice managers and exchange insights that drive meaningful change.

✨ Earn 5.5 CE credits towards CVPM, enjoy dance parties, giveaways, and more!

Ready to make waves? Join us at the Practice Manager Summit and let's redefine veterinary practice management together!

Upcoming events: unchartedvet.com/upcoming-events/


Episode Transcript

Dr. Andy Roark: Hey everybody and welcome to the Uncharted Veterinary Podcast. Guys, we got a great one for you today. The one and only Stephanie Goss is off today, but I am pulling in an amazing guest, a mentor of mine, someone I look up to. I'm just going to keep her secret here for a moment until I introduce her.

But we have a great episode about a doctor who is really slow in the exam rooms. Really slow. He's been there for nine months. The practice owner just really doesn't want to write him up because, hey, we don't want to take off the doctors, but he's falling behind and he's not getting his medical records done.

And he's doing phone calls instead of coming to staff meetings. And worst of all, The other doctors are having to do some of his phone calls because people are waiting all day and he's not getting to them. And so other doctors are getting pulled in to help clean up and juggle these clients. And this is not good, but he just doesn't seem to see a problem with it.

Guys, this is going to sound real familiar for a lot of you. And we got a fresh take on tackling it today. So it's going to be a great one. Let's get into it.

Andy: And we are back. It's me, Dr. Andy Roark, and the one and only Dr. Amanda Donnelly. How are you, Amanda?

Amanda: I am great, Andy! How are you?

Andy: I am so great. I am thrilled to have you as my wingman and co host on today's episode. I have admired you for years. You've been someone who's been a mentor to me in my career. You are, for those who do not know you, you are a, you're a second generation veterinarian. You are a well renowned, world renowned, well renowned speaker. You've been the Practice Management Educator of the Year at the Western Vet Conference. You write a wonderful column in today's Veterinary Business Magazine that runs with the column that I write. And I always pull your stuff and want to read and see and see what you're doing and see what you're talking about.

You have probably written, probably I don't think I don't think I'm trying to think of anything that might compete with it. You have written probably my favorite book in veterinary veterinary leadership, veterinary management. It's called ‘Leading and Managing Veterinary Teams‘. I am thrilled to have you here. Have you been?

Amanda: I’ve been good. And thank you for all those wonderful accolades. I really appreciate it. I've been super busy. That's it. That's a good, that's a good thing. It's a good time to be in veterinary practice management and speaking.

Andy: It is. To you, number, so just a side before we get started, when, when you're talking about looking at practices and working with them, are you, are you. How much emphasis are you getting on going faster? Is this, are you getting a big push for increasing efficiency? Cause well I just came back from the VMX conference and that's what I heard about again and again was people saying, how do we go faster?

And I thought that was kind of odd, it wasn't what I was expecting. Do you, have you had that experience?

Amanda: Well, you know, what's interesting, what I have found is that yes, increasing efficiency is still incredibly relevant even now that we've come out of the pandemic years. But I am hearing a lot more reports about practices slowing down. So the efficiency point, you know, really That needs to happen But some of the practices at least some of the ones that i'm working with and that I talk to The, they're concerned about making sure that they are getting more clients in, you know?

Andy: That's why that's why I was surprised. So, so in Uncharted, you know, we always watch trends and talk, talk with our practices that are, that are members and things. And we had, in the last quarter of the year, we saw a pretty marked slowdown. It's very regional. Some people were like, we see no change, but we were having some that were having pretty substantial drops in their, in their clients coming in.

It was, it was, that's why it was so interesting at, at VMX. I would talk to groups that were like, oh, we really beating the demand. It's going to be huge. And I. I thought, man, that's, that's not what I'm, what I'm sort of seeing. That's kind of why I was sort of fishing to see, see where your head was at.

I'm really sort of talking to people about go ahead, making sure you're gearing up your client reminders. You're getting your, your marketing back on point because we didn't have to deal with that for a long time. We had more work than we could do. But I think we're, it's time to start reengaging our client communications to make sure that if a demand for vet services starts to dip, the individual practices is, is taken care of as they can be.

Amanda: Yeah. Yeah. No, I couldn't agree more. And I have gotten a surge in the last six months of people asking me to help with client service and client communications. And nobody had time for that, you know, from 2020 to 2022.

Andy: do think that fell off. Yeah, I think I think you're spot on I think I think everything swings like a pendulum, you know, I think there's when everybody was swamped and trying to doggy paddle keep their head above water The client service part was not high on their priority list and you are swinging that swinging back.

 I think clients are a bit more discerning right now. I think that they're kind of looking for reasons to keep their wallet in their pocket, not just in that medicine, but in everything. And I think that client service communication part, the education importance is climbing back up, which is good to see, but always changing.

Hey, I got a I got a case for you from our mailbag. And I thought you would be uniquely suited to come in and help me sort of break it down. Is that okay?

Amanda: Hit me with it.

Andy: All right, cool. So there's a little bit to it, but basically here goes so so we got an email from a practice manager and they're in a four doctor practice and they say they have a great culture and they got a fantastic team but they're having a hard time with one of the Doctors.

They said he's an excellent vet when it comes to clients. Most of them love him and he's pretty good producer too. He can sometimes run behind because he has his quote special clients unquote. That while they do spend a lot of money at the clinic, he ends up chatting with them for a long time. So I don't know.

Maybe you can make an argument that's concierge care. I don't know. We'll come back to it. We've tried extending his appointment times for those certain clients, but then he's still like whatever time he has, he just takes that time. Plus 30%. Like, so if you give him more time, it just seems like it gets, it gets longer.

He also has a bad habit of not finishing up his charts, and he runs behinds on phone calls, so he ends up using like, if they have a staff meeting, he's never there, because he's always trying to get his charts done or his phone calls. Stuff like that. It's frustrating to some of the other doctors. I think one of the things that would frustrate me is that some of the phone calls are falling on other doctors because clients are mad because he's not getting back to them, so the other doctor's having to call.

And so that's a problem. It sounds like these guys are running a really good ship. When they, when they talk to him about, about it, and they talk to him about running behind, he says that if he had more technicians, he'd be able to do more. But, but they've got a three to one tech to doctor ratio, which again, sounds really solid.

And the other doctors are making it just, just fine. And so anyway, I think that that's the main thing. They've brought up dictation softwares and, and he says he just, he, he thinks it's faster to type and it just, it seems like I've got a frustrated manager here who's really trying to throw everything at this doctor.

To get him get him out of the rooms and get him back on track And he's just not I don't know if it's a self awareness thing, but he's he just doesn't seem motivated. Now, I will also say, I know you see this a lot doctor retention is important at practices. Right now doctors are very hard to find and we all have the interest of keeping our cultures good and we want to motivate people the nice way and we like to retain our doctors if we can because it does sound like this guy generally is doing a good job and is popular.

It's just this point of frustration that's dragging them down. So. When I tell you all that, Amanda, sort of lay it down, let's, let's start with head space here. So, so put yourself in the shoes of the manager. What, what are you going to think of so that you can be productive in this situation? What do you think?

What do you think people need to kind of understand about positions like this?

Amanda: Well, this is an awesome question. First of all, I've just got to say, because I have heard similar challenges from other managers. So I love that we're talking about this and clearly it sounds like she's super frustrated and understandably so and, and stressed, you know, because now she has a doctor who should be doing his work, but she's having to spend all of this time trying to get him to be more efficient.

Which, you know, if he was doing his job, she wouldn't have to be spending time on that. And so that's a problem. Um, so, I mean, if I think about, you know, like, what is she thinking in her perspective, I'm assuming that she sees this as a lack of accountability. He's not doing the same thing that the other doctors are doing.

You know, maybe she even feels he's not being a good role model you know, for the rest of the team. So, but I think the main thing, you know, for the manager is just this frustration about how do I get this guy to do– this doctor to do what he's supposed to do, 

Andy: I think you touched on one of the big ones for me is it's really easy to tell yourself stories about this. You know what I mean? Like, he's lazy. He doesn't, especially when you talk to the person, their behavior doesn't change and start to be like, he's, he's acting like he cares, but he doesn't care. He's not taking this seriously.

And My, sort of my, that's my part for Headspace, is I look at this and say, I really appreciate how this person wrote into the mailbag, because it does not feel like they have, they're frustrated, it does not feel like they have tipped over into the point of being just, enraged or, or just going down an aggressive sort of toxic path.

And it's again, you can be, one of my friends calls it justifiable anger. It's like you can easily justify this anger and also know that carrying that anger around when you plan to deal with this is probably just going to get in your way and reduce your chances of being effective.

Amanda: Yeah, it sounds like the manager has actually been incredibly helpful to try to help this doctor. So I agree with what you're saying.

Andy: I also, you know, I think they mentioned the team a number of times and you get into headspace and You know, I think one of the big things for me when we talk about Just management in general. I'm a big fan of the idea that we're all trying to achieve balance, which is I do want to support this doctor. But also I can't have my other doctors being mad because they're doing calls to frustrated clients who've been waiting all day to be talked to like that's not Okay.

And I'm a big deal. I'm a big fan of like medical records are part of being on the team, especially if we're in doing modern medicine, where we pass cases around, where we try to leverage our technicians, where the front desk is doing communication for us. You can't not write up your charts because you're really letting down the whole team.

And again, I don't think this comes from a, I have never seen an evil doctor. That's just like, I don't care. I just, I know that they're. busy, and I know they're getting behind. I just, for me you can hold two things in your mind at the same time. You can decide that this person's behavior is not okay, and also empathize and be like, hey, I know what it's like.

We're all, we're trying to do a good job. I suspect oftentimes when I see doctors like this, like relationships are a big motivator for them. You know, it's, it's, it's their, it's their love languages, relationships, and maintaining relationships, and so the idea of cutting people short. It's just, it's, it's very hard for them and it can also be unacceptable to our team.

Both of those things can be true.

Amanda: Yeah. I think what really jumps out at me when you talk about this case is, you know, what, what is the doctor thing? Cause they keep asking him to, to, to be on time and, you know, and he's, he's not wanting to change his behavior. And so what jumps out at me is that he probably doesn't think this is a big problem, or, or presumably he would have made some changes.

And what is fascinating to me, and I've seen this with other doctors in my entire life and career, is that they'll help one client and go overboard to help them, or I've had other doctors that run behind. Either because they don't have good communication skills or they chat too much with clients or whatnot.

And so, like you said, they have this desire to have this great relationship, but then what they forget is what about all the other clients that they're not taking care of? So, not doing the callbacks, not having the charts done. That is hurting those clients. And what about the clients that are waiting?

You know, so, you know, because you're running behind so we're really not, you know, serving all of the clients Well with his type of behavior and as you also said there's an impact on the team So I think that is I don't think he's really appreciating the impact on the team, the other clients, and then of course the business at large

Andy: Yeah. You're speaking at the Uncharted Practice Manager Summit on February 28th. It's a virtual conference that is only for practice managers. And so it's a one day event, you're doing a workshop called how to create a culture of accountability. And you mentioned accountability here as well.

Talk to me a little bit about what that culture of accountability would look like. So I think that's good headspace before we actually address this doctor. How does that, how does that sort of start to come together in the mind of the practice manager?

Amanda: Well, I think that, yes, you're right. I love talking about accountability and I'm happy to be able to talk about this at your conference. I think that so much of accountability is the doctor doesn't, is, is trying to figure out what is the underlying cause and, you know, with him, I think it's, it's a little different, you know, being in a doctor situation, maybe, but I think he doesn't understand the ramifications of his behavior, but also made, I don't know, maybe the expectations were never clearly established at the very beginning.

So we've got, you know, so one of the causes of lack of accountability can be lack of clarity. Now, they keep saying. You need to do your records on time, or you need to be on time, or we're going to pull you out of the room, you know, those kinds of things. But fundamentally, he's been practicing for whatever period of time and, and, and another cause of lack of accountability can be lack of consequences.

So if there's not any. ramifications or consequences for him continuing this behavior, he's going to keep doing it. And then I think what happens is the lack of clarity here might be maybe he doesn't have written job expectations. Maybe, you know, the parameters he has to work within haven't been established.

But also what happens so often is what I find is that managers or medical directors, they might talk to an employee, in this case, it's the doctor, but it starts to really sort of just be tuned out and sound like blah, blah, blah, blah, blah to the person who's receiving it because they're like, yeah, they're nagging me.

But, you know, I'm doing, you know, people like me, you know, I'm making the practice money. I'm helping these clients. And so they just, they don't see the big picture. So part of it is figuring out maybe from a lack of accountability is we have to set those what are the policies and protocols that a person needs to work within and what are the consequences of not doing it.

But I also think in this case, especially since he's a doctor, Andy, is he's in a leadership position and I don't, I think a lot, a lot of times associates don't necessarily think, oh, wait a minute, you know, I, I got that DVM and along with it, I got, I also had this leadership certification, whether I want it or not.

And so, that's where part of the lack of accountability piece also, you know, dovetails into self leadership and getting him to identify, you know, some of the things that he needs to do, which we can talk about some of the solutions, but I do think that that's a lot of what's going on here, too, is not just the lack of accountability, although there is that, that he's not taking ownership of, but then there's also a lack of leadership skills on his part.

Andy: I agree with that. I think that's a really good point. I like– you put your finger right on the doctor as the leader and sort of, you know, people, people have a responsibility because of their title. And so I think that's interesting. I want to unpack the self leadership part with you in a second. But have you so you I think you're spot on about a possibly just say a lack of clarity, clear job expectations. I think it's fair to say, Hey, our expectation is that clients get called back within a certain time that you write your charts up. That's a very easy expectation to set things like that, that other doctors don't have to step in and do parts of your work for you. Are there, are there other expectations? How do you set expectations for staying on time, Amanda? Because it's kind of, at least for me and my career, it's always kind of been a willy nilly thing of nobody really, it wasn't ever like, I'm sorry, Andy, if you have a 30 minute appointment.

And it starts at 2:30, at 3 p. m. you need to be out of that room. And I've never, I've never been held to that standard. And I think, you know, different cases involve different things. How do you set expectations for people staying on time? Have you ever seen something like that where there's a metric where, I mean, honestly, I, they have already done the thing of sending the technician in with a code to say, really, we need to move on.

But is, how do you set clarity around, hey, this is the pace we would like for you to keep up? Have you seen that?

Amanda: Well, yes, and no, I guess it's, I'm going to waffle a little bit because yes, I've seen the expectations be put in place, but, and I've seen people that run on time and people who don't because this reminds me, this reminds me of a relatively young doctor that I worked with a couple of years ago, who was, who was always 30 minutes or more behind and the rest of the practice was not.

And it was definitely how he managed his time, but all, but it was very specifically how he communicated with clients. So, the fix wasn't to say just the expectations are for you to run on time because he just, he couldn't, he couldn't adhere. I mean, he basically couldn't meet the expectations. So the fix wasn't just about setting expectations, it became helping him with some client communication skills and a few other strategies for how he could

be on time. You know, how he could change his client conversations maybe leverage the staff up a little bit, but I think part of this is going to be with this particular doctor is helping him with some leadership coaching and some client communications training and also. I think the question is, well, why do these expectations, you know, even exist?

And I still think too, another thing that we didn't really hit on is why can the other doctors all run on time pretty much? And he can't like, what is the difference? And I'm guessing that the difference is that he spends too much time in the room, but see, it might just not be chitchat. Maybe the staff thinks it's chitchat, but maybe he doesn't run an organized appointment.

Maybe he's all over the map. See, maybe he's like, Oh, we could do this. We could do that. And I don't know, you know, so there, there, there could be an organizational flow issue that we need to, you know, videotaping his appointments might be really helpful, but I think you have to drill into that. Yeah. And determine if there is something missing here that he needs help or training with why he can't do it, why he can't adhere to the same time limitations as the other doctors.

So I think there's that piece to maybe dissect a little bit. But then fundamentally, very much, this is going to be, I think, a coaching opportunity.

Andy: I, I, I like that a lot. I think that's a, I think that's a really good call out. Again, I said, you know, we yeah, be careful what the stories we tell ourselves. I think your idea of what if he's what if it's not chit chat? What if he really just does not have an organized way to approach his appointments or he's not he's not good at creating, you know treatment plans that are concrete and presenting them in an actionable way I think that's a really good call. So, you talked about Self leadership.

You said, you know, so I'm totally with you on the idea that, that the doctor is looked up to and, and is sort of setting a precedent and a tone sort of for the team. And by the role of doctor, you have certain leadership responsibilities. And so talk to me a little bit about the term self leadership, and ike, what is that? How is that different from just saying the doctor is a leader? Unpack that for me.

Amanda: Well, if you look at definitions, and I try to keep this pretty simple, but if you look at, like, what's the definition of self leadership, it's going to be that process of influencing your own thoughts and actions towards achieving your goals. And the goals, some of the goals here, of course, that we're referencing would be the hospital goals of seeing not only seeing all of our patients and taking care of them, but also excellent client care.

But it is that it's that process. It's that self process. So it's the process of influencing your own thoughts and actions towards achieving. You know, whatever the goals are your own personal goals or the goals that, you know, have been put upon you. So, in this instance, it would be looking at the piece that I think might be missing here for him is that I'm not sure there's any self reflection going on.

So, self leadership requires self reflection. What's working well for me? What's not working so well for me? How am I impacting others? You know, how am I how can I change? See, I don't think he, I don't think he sees the, from what we know, it doesn't appear that he sees the need fundamentally to change. He, he knows they want him to change, but I don't think he really feels the need.

And I think with self leadership what, what the action about is, is identifying, well, okay, what, what needs to change, you know, that would make everything better, you know, would help the team, would help my coworkers, would help the clients, would help. Cause see, he could actually see more patients. 

If he was able to be more efficient. So it's, it's the self reflection of, oh, wait a minute. Okay. Maybe there is something here. They're not just nagging me and, and getting him to self-reflect. I think that's going to be a real important for him to see that his leadership, see doctors.

Associate doctors may think that their self leadership or their leadership role at the practice is just to direct traffic, which is, of course, true. You know, I need you to call this client. I need you to set this IV catheter, whatever, but it's also about. bringing a team together and, and he's creating chaos, you know, sometimes for the team, he's not bringing the team together.

He's not being a role model. So the self leadership part of that is helping him understand that, that it's not only about the medicine. And that's the part I think that associates miss is that whether they want to have the leadership role or not. They do have it as it relates to the team. It's not just about patient care and client care.

It's how they interface with, with helping the team and getting the best client service, the best patient care throughout the day. And that's the piece that I think he's not seeing that some of these individual actions have a greater, broader impact on the business. And specifically, you know, when I say the business, I mean, client care, potentially patient care, but very much the efficiency of the practice, the stress of the team, you know, now somebody is having to try to pull them out of a room.

And I think the biggest thing here, and we can get into this more, but I feel that this manager is perhaps thinking that this is like her problem to solve. And I'm like, wait a minute. It's like if they're if they're saying, oh, we could do dictation software and oh, we could, you know, we could give you more staff or oh, we could change this protocol or oh, we could get have, you know, pull you out of a room.

It's like the practice is doing all this work to try to help him. What is he doing? I mean, he's not taking ownership is what I'm saying.

Andy: Oh, I, I, you just blew my mind. I, I love that you called that out at some point. We've all probably been in a relationship where we work too damn hard to make the relationship work and we just didn't feel like the other person was, you know, was coming with their half of the relationship. And so I think, I think that's, I think that's a really good headspace.

I am chomping at the bit to dive into this a little bit and start to say, well, how do we actually move this case forward? Let's take a quick break and we'll come back and then we'll get into the action steps. Sound good?

Amanda: Yeah, that sounds great.

Stephanie Goss: Did you know that we offer workshops for our Uncharted members and for our non members? So if you're listening to today's podcast and you are not a member of Uncharted yet, you should be, but this is not a conversation about joining Uncharted. This is a conversation about all of the amazing content that we have coming at all of you, whether or not you're a member through our workshop series.

You should head over to the website at unchartedvet.com/events and check out what is coming. We have got an amazing lineup on the regular. We've got something every month, sometimes two or three things in a month coming at you to expand your brain, to talk about leadership, to talk about practice management and dive into the kind of topics that Andy and I talk about on the podcast every week.

So now's your chance. Stop what you're doing. Pick up your cell phone. I know it's not far from you and type in unchartedvet.com/events. See what's coming and sign up. They are always free to our uncharted members and they have a small fee attached to them. If you are not currently a member, you can get all of the details, pricing, dates, times, and register head over to the website.

Now I want to see ya there.

Andy: Alright, so let's, let's get in this unpack what our actual strategy is going to be.

So we've got this manager who's asked us, and I may not have mentioned at the beginning, this doctor has only been there nine months. It's not 90 days, but in their practice, it's fairly new. I feel a sense of urgency here. And I don't know if you would agree and you would say, no, that's not, it's not a problem for me.

I'm going. This feels like an important time, and if we kind of take our foot off the gas here, or just let it ride for a while, then some of these behaviors are going to really crystallize and be a problem later on. So I, I'm wondering if you're feeling a sense of urgency, but as we, we sit down and we've got this manager and we say, all right, let's decide what we're going to actually do.

Where, where do you start with this, Amanda? Kind of what's the first thing you'd say? This is on the action plan.

Amanda: Well, I think the first is so often we don't have a job description for veterinarians and that's going to be pretty streamlined because it's going to say the obligatory information about. You know, their patient care and if they do surgery and all of that, but what I'm talking about is what we want to put in writing, what are the job expectations?

And I'm, I'm referring to these types of job expectations that records will be written up in a timely manner. And of course you have to define, well, what is a timely manner? So you can't just say, you know, timely, cause that might be a week to them.

Andy: Sure, that's, that's, that's seven days, in my mind.

Amanda: But I do, I do think we need to start with putting the expectations in writing so that that could be given to him.

And of course, key point here, that expectation should be given to all the associates, not just him. But then I think the core crux of all of these action steps are mostly. Going to be coaching sessions with him and recognizing that it won't be a one and done. I don't see this as 1 conversation and oh, that's magically going to fix everything.

So I think it's going to be a series of conversations, which I would love to talk about some of those. The nuances of those conversations, but, but the reason I say that it's mostly going to be about conversations with him is this seems to be a people problem, not a systems problem because everybody else apparently is running on time.

And this is, this is a doctor, you know, whatever this doctor you know, it's their problem. So that's where we get into these one on one sessions and and I think with those one on one sessions, there are. Really two key components. One, we already hit on, which is that rather than coming at him and saying, we need you to do this, we need you to do that, which is going to sound like the nagging and it's kind of puts the, it's like, it's the practices job to solve this instead.

Fundamentally, that conversation needs to be about what will you do? What will you do to be on time? What will you do to get your charts written, you know, in a timely manner, just like all the other doctors? What will you do? So now he may not have all those answers in the first meeting. And in fact, I'm all forgiving someone time, you know, a day or two.

You know, a couple of days to think about that because they might, you know, and, and, and they might, this manager might get pushback. He might be, well, what do you mean? What am I going to do? I've, you know, I'm going to try to type faster, which we know doesn't work. So, that's one thing. But another awesome part of this that I think has to be touched on Andy.

Is to make this conversation about alignment with the core values of the practice. Now, you probably know I'm a huge fan of leading and managing by core values. I think most of chapter two in my book is about that. So hopefully this is a practice that already has core values in place. But even if they don't have them written and, and well defined, they still know what they are.

So, in this case, the core values that I would say most practices, if not all, have, whether they're clearly defined or not, the three that immediately would come to mind in this scenario are going to be teamwork, respect, and client care. So I would come up with, you know, what's 1 or 2 of the core values that they either already have or fundamentally know that they have and get him to see that his behavior is not aligned with a core value because he's not fulfilling his role of the team.

He's you know, the team can't operate, you know, effectively because of his actions. Client care is suffering because now we've got clients that are mad that they're not getting their lab results on time or he's not they're having to wait because he's, you know, spending so much time with the first client.

And then all of that, you know, respect becomes an issue, you know, cause it's like I fundamentally just to be clear. I do not think this is a bad doctor in any way, shape, or form. I think he just doesn't appreciate, maybe, the ramifications and impact that he's having on this, on this team. And so, when I say, you know, respect, that's what he's got to, has to understand is that it is a lack of respect, though, when he just keeps on keeping on doing what he wants to do without regard to how it affects the rest of the team.

When you change the conversation to talk about the core values, Now all of a sudden it's a different conversation that takes it out. It takes away that nagging. So we're not just saying, Oh, you need to do this, which sounds like nagging. It's like, gosh, we need everybody to adhere to our core values. These are the ways in which your behavior is not aligned with those.

And then that, you know, so that's kind of the drop back. I guess is what I'm saying to the coaching conversations that we want to have with him.

Andy: Yeah, well, before the break, you were talking about getting him to sort of self-reflect and my question to you was really going to be, how do you do, how do you do that? How do you, how do you get that self awareness? I think there's a lot of people who struggle with doctors, but, but honestly, anybody on your team who just lacks self awareness, and you say, how do you do this?

It sounds like you're going to try to use the core values to push that self awareness component to say, this is, this is how you're being perceived, or this is the actions, this is what, this is the impact that your actions are having, trying to get them to trigger a look at their, at their own behavior.

Is that as, am I right on that?

Amanda: Yes. And to your– to the 1st, half of your question there, which I'm so glad you ask the really key part of this to get him to self anybody to self reflect. The beauty of that is through the open ended question, so you could have the open ended question has to be inviting them to tell you their story or inviting them to give you input or feedback.

So, if you say, you know, do you appreciate the negative impact this is having on the team? See, that's closed ended, right? Because they can go, well, no, but that's not what you want. We've got to change that and say, how do you think you running behind is affecting our other clients? How do you think you having to be called out of rooms or not running on time? You know, how do you think that affects our clients who are waiting?

How do you think that affects the team and then also part of the self reflection is you know? What are your solutions for how you can run on time? What are your ideas for? How you can organize your day And so that you are able to complete charts and appointments and callbacks, you know, when they need to be accomplished.

That's the self reflection– is you're asking that person for their thoughts, their ideas and their action steps. Remember the definition of self leadership, that process of influencing our own thoughts and actions. So that's what we're asking. But that has to be through an open ended question. And he's not, he, she, whoever, I don't know if we even know the who this associate is, but they they, they're not going to have all these solutions all at once.

So we've got, you know, we've got to assume that this is going to take multiple coaching sessions and maybe just one or two action steps at a time. We can't expect this doctor to just change overnight, but I do want. To emphasize what you said, which is if this person's only been working at this practice for nine months.

Now is a real sense of urgency to try to change habits because we can't, we can't change him. You can't force him to do anything. But what we can do is help him self reflect, help him with, you know, identify. some actions that would help everybody. And then one of the things we didn't touch on Andy was being clear on another way that that you can tackle this too is to try to be clear on what we think motivates him.

I'm not sure if you said at the very beginning most managers want to motivate their staff to take more emotion initiative or motivate them to. And so the question is, what are his motivators? Because fundamentally we can't really motivate people. There's a whole book on that, but what we can know is what are, what, what triggers them?

Like what, what is a trigger for them? And I mean, a good trigger, like what. What gets them up in the morning or what do they wish they were better at? So some doctors are really motivated by money. You know, they might be on production. They might, you know, they, you know, I'm not saying that they're bad doctors or that they do anything, but they, but, you know, they want to make a nice living and they want to work a little harder and make sure that they're doing everything that they can do you know, for compensation.

Some doctors—money doesn't mean anything at all to them. And they, it's all about the clients. Other doctors, it's all about the patients. Some doctors are really much all about the team. So the question is what motivates him? Because we want to help him see that whatever it is he wants, we're going to help him get what he wants as well as help the practice.

Because I imagine he wants much of what. The team wants, he sounds like he gets along with everybody, gets along with most of the clients, but what we have to get him to see is, okay, you want that? We're going to help you get more of that. Like him, we need him to see that running on time and doing, meeting his job expectations is a win win for everybody.

The clients, the patients, the team, everybody,

Andy: I think you did a good job here. I really like this plan in that the setting of expectations at the beginning in my mind, that's also when we're going to lay down the metrics of success that we're going to be watching to say, Are we getting on track? How do we know? Because otherwise, you know, he ended up saying, I feel like I'm going faster.

Like I'm talking faster, you know, and I'm pretty darn sure I was closer to being on time yesterday than I have been in a long time. And so, so it's laying those things down. And I really like these coaching conversations. Amanda, how, how do you, so I'm not a patient person and I've, I've, I've struggled with, with that, and I've gotten, as I've gotten older, I've mellowed a bit, but what is, what is an acceptable turnaround time here, especially if, if we're having these conversations over, you know, over a series of days or meetings to kind of try to bring them into alignment?

And we're saying, Hey, look, he's been here nine months. We feel like this is an important time. How do you pace yourself so that you're not jumping the gun and saying, look, he's gotten 10 percent better in one week. And that's not nearly enough, or maybe 10 percent in one week is really good? I don't exactly know.

How do you, how do you pace yourself so you can decide? Yes, I see progress and I'm continuing on or I'm not seeing enough progress. Like how do you, I know there's probably no direct answer but how do you benchmark 

Amanda: Well, I think, I think, I think you're absolutely right about trying to determine some metrics. And then how do we measure them? And what's a reasonable timeline? I mean, certainly the metrics is we can, we can absolutely, if they aren't already doing it, we can track wait times for sure. We can also set an expectation of.

The number of days or hours that a callback is supposed to be done or a chart maybe has to be written before you leave the building or by noon the next day, or, you know, whatever those. So those are either you kind of, you either did your charts. You did your callbacks by the deadline or you didn't.

So I think those are relatively easy metrics to get in place. I think the running behind though, you know, we really also– in this case, I would want to measure the use of his communication skill and his organizational strategies. So, like, for example, some doctors will find it incredibly helpful that they have their, you know, whoever, whatever their technician is, they

figure out strategies that that technician is going to keep them on time or help them stay organized. I'm not talking about, you know, pulling them out of a room. I'm talking about other organizational flow kind of strategies. So, maybe he needs some communication skills training for clients. Like, let's say he's having this chatty client.

Does he have the skill to know how to extract himself from the chatty client? Like, that's something I could help him with. Right? Because, you know, I can help doctors or team members know. How to be fully present with that client, but extract yourself and, you know, and to lead the conversation.

So those metrics are also things that we can measure, you know, is he using those skills now to the timeline? You know, I guess I would start with like a 3, a 3 month timeline. And what I mean by that is that there would still be some parameters within there. And I kind of chose. Three months just because you know at that point he will have been working a year but in regards to the timeline, I What would be best would be to set very small action steps that like what are you working on this week?

One or two things he's working on this week What are you working on next week and ideally hold I would hold meetings at a minimum every two weeks Maybe weekly with him because if we meet with him for short periods of time I would rather see short meetings frequently to keep the momentum and see if he has questions and how he's doing give him feedback asking what his challenges are That's going to be better than only meeting monthly because that's way too far out. You know, there's not an opportunity to do coaching.

So I would meet with them weekly, you know every you know 7 to 14 days. How are you doing? You know what's working and what's not and assess the progress? And then, I would kind of look at, you know, a monthly chunk of time, you know, and, and I would expect to see some very quick improvement on the timeliness of the charts and, and the callbacks, but I think the being behind in the rooms will just take, I think that's going to take a little longer.

And I think it's realistic to give him time, you know, for, for that change.

Andy: That all makes sense. I definitely am on board with that. You know this writer mentions, as well, that the practice owner in this case is not quite ready to write this person up for, you know, for fear of ticking the doctor off and, and having him lead. So whether it's a practice owner or a regional manager or the, or the medical director or whoever the, the appropriate person is in your structure.

I mean, how do you feel about that, Amanda? Is that a big deal? Is that not a big deal? Is this an interpersonal thing that doesn't really warrant a write up before this point? Where's your head at in 

Amanda: Well, two responses. First of all, I'm not a big fan of write ups. Now, let me be clear, I am definitely in favor of progressive discipline, because at some point, we've got to have some warnings, some write ups, or, you know, and, and at some point that would lead to termination. So it has to be progressive, but what I mean about discipline is everything should be documented.

But you could document it where it's not a warning. You could document it as what I call a lack of accountability conversation or a coaching or a feedback session, whatever you want to call it. The reason the documentation is important is just to keep us organized and if we ever did have to go to termination that we would have our documentation there.

So I don't, I don't think we should look at this as, “Oh, we're going to write you up for this.” Just because that's not usually how I approach these cases because he is a good doctor. It sounds like the medicine's good and you know, if this is more of a you know his not so much his personality, but some of his leadership and communication skills So but what's important the second part of that is the fear of of terminating somebody or to your point What happens is so often in recent times because of our doctor shortages.

I see the leadership team, they don't even want to talk to the doctor because they're like, Oh, gosh, well, we can't afford to lose them. So we're not even going to address it. So here I'm going to say something very pointed, which is when we don't give people feedback. Now, I mean, effective feedback, not nagging, but if we don't give them very effective, positive and negative feedback, that specific and related to the core values, we are robbing them of the opportunity to improve.

Andy: Yeah.

Amanda: So we are doing the doctor an actual disservice if we do not address this in a more meaningful way. And so, I think if you run your business based on fear, and that's easy for me to say because I'm not in the trenches anymore, but if you run your business on fear, that's never going to work well. And to your earlier point, if we address it right now, It'll be a lot easier than trying to address it 6, 12, 18 months from now.

So, I would just try to put the fear off the table and say, We need to have meaningful conversations with this doctor about how he needs to change, make him a part of that solution. And I can't imagine if he's, if he, you know, he's getting along well with the staff and likes the clients, it's not like he's going to walk just because you talk to him, you know, you know, so that's not going to happen.

Andy: But I see that fear, like I 100 percent there's the idea, but if we talk to him, he'll walk away and I think you're, you're right to point it out as that would, that would be what then people do irrational things, but that'd be wildly foolish. And I completely agree. You oftentimes as a manager, we pick our poison.

And so. Do you want the poison of, I don't know, he might freak out and walk away, or do you want the poison of, we, we have no input into this behavior because we're afraid to have this conversation. Like, I'm not, I'm not living my life that way.

Amanda: Right. Well, and plus, sometimes when we don't have a conversation, whether it's a doctor or some other employee with job performance, then the, what about the rest of the staff? You know, we, so we don't address problem with one person and then the whole rest of the staff be starts becoming disgruntled.

Andy: Well, I think this is a solid plan for, for getting up and getting going. I think at this point you kind of have to wait and see how they respond before you, before you kind of figure out where, where to go from here. But I do think this is a really good way to sort of open the door, get some systems in place.

I really liked the job expectations up front. I think the series of conversations is a good way of setting expectations for our manager friend to say, “Hey, Rome is not going to be built in a day.” We're just, we're going to, we're going to go through and have these conversations. We're going to circle back the open ended questions to get this person to sort of demonstrate some self reflection and awareness, pulling in the core values.

I'm totally there with you leading by fear and just sort of taking that off the table. I think that's an excellent strategy. I feel pretty good about, about this, this plan overall. Are there any final points, words of wisdom, advice that you want to give to people or that you'd give to this person?

Amanda: Yeah, I do think a couple of things to mention. I think first of all, there's so many fabulous books out there. So we could identify some books. Can't make him read them, but in books, not just books for him, but books for this manager to help her know how to navigate these conversations, her or him. And so, that's one option: leadership coaching for both of them.

And so, you know, how to navigate these conversations because we've got some great leadership coaches in our profession. I am not a certified coach, but I do approach much of my, you know, remote consulting in a collaborative coaching manner. So we've got great resources there within the profession, or they could get somebody outside the profession.

We've got several veterinarians that have their own companies. that do mentorship for younger veterinarians. So that might be an option. So I think those, I guess my point here, Andy, is it's not just all on this manager. I would recommend that this person avail themselves of outside resources. It could just be a doctor in the practice that would mentor them, you know, somewhat about how they run their appointments on time.

Andy: I think that makes a ton of sense. I really like that. Yeah. It's always nice to have the realization that you don't have to be the one who does all of the lifting.

Amanda: Exactly.

Andy: This is fantastic. I really appreciate you being here. I really appreciate you tackling this case with me.

For those who don't know you and want to learn more from you, like I said, your column in Today's Veterinary Business comes out every other month. It's an excellent column. Your book is one of my favorites on the business of vet medicine. It is called Leading and Managing Veterinary Teams, and you're putting it on sale.

We talked before, and the plan is it's going to go on sale on Amazon starting the day of the Uncharted Practice Manager Summit, so that's going to be February 28th. It's going to go on sale for a couple of days, and people, if they've been holding off on grabbing it, should jump on, put it on your calendar, set an alarm.

Amanda: Yeah.

Andy: Make sure you jump in and grab it.

Amanda: Exactly. And just so everybody who's listening to this knows, the price that they will see on Amazon as of the 28th is 10 less than it normally is. So it won't say, hey, this is a sale, but just know that in three days after the conference, approximately, that cost is going to go back up.

So that's the promotion that we're doing. And I do want to mention Andy hopefully by the time this airs and whatnot I did a complete update, refresh, design update and everything to my website. So I am super excited. Probably by, oh, I'm going to say certainly by the end of January, the, the new websites there.

It's, you know, it's very similar in terms of content but just new photos and new design and super, super cool.

Andy: I will put a link to that in the show notes. Dr. Amanda Donnelly, thank you for being here. Guys, thanks for tuning in, everybody. Take care of yourselves, gang. Be well.

Amanda: Thanks, Andy.

Dr. Andy Roark: Oh, man. Guys, that's so fun. Thank you to Dr. Amanda Donnelly for being here. If you have not registered for the Practice Manager Summit, the Uncharted Practice Manager Summit, and you're a practice manager, what are you waiting for? It's one day. You can do it from home. You can even work part of the day and then jam out on this summit.

It's going to be awesome. But Amanda will be there talking about a culture of accountability. We've had a number of other workshops. There's going to be a lot of discussion because it is a summit, but you're going to get to meet a lot of other practice managers. It's a really good time.Also, that's when her book will be going on sale. That's February the 28th. Jump on Amazon and grab a copy. You'll be glad that you have it. It is a phenomenal resource. All right, team. Take care of yourselves, everybody. Talk to you soon.

Written by Maria Pirita · Categorized: Blog, Podcast · Tagged: communication, culture, doctor, management, Training

Dec 06 2023

Making Sure It’s Written Down: How Do We Keep Discipline Consistent Across the Practice(s)?

Dr. Erica Pounds joins Dr. Andy Roark to answer a question about if, when, and how discipline and disciplinary actions should be systematized across practices in a multi-site organization. Is it fair that some people have stricter managers than others? Should everyone in every location expect the same response if they come up short in an important way? Let's get into this!

Uncharted Veterinary Podcast · UVP-262-Making Sure It's Written Down-How Do We Keep Discipline Consistent Across The Practice(s)?

You can also listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music or wherever you get your podcasts.

ABOUT OUR GUEST:

My name is Dr. Erica Pounds, and I am an Area Chief of Staff for Banfield Pet Hospital in the Tennessee Market. I graduated from Mississippi State University in 2008 with a B.S in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and then went on to receive my DVM from the University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine in 2011. I started with Banfield Pet Hospital following graduation and will be celebrating 12 years with the practice in August.

My clinical interests include dermatology, internal medicine, and of course preventive care! Throughout my career with Banfield, I have been able to grow and develop from an associate DVM to Area Chief of Staff and even spent time as Interim Director of Veterinary Quality. I have a passion for development and love being able to see my hospital teams grow and achieve their goals. On the personal side, I am the mom of 4 amazing little boys and thrive in the land of Legos, Superheroes, and Soccer! I love running Spartan races with my husband and brothers. I am a big-time quilter and my sewing room is one of my most favorite retreats.

Do you have something that you would love Andy and Stephanie to roleplay on the podcast – a situation where you would love some examples of what someone else would say and how they would say it? If so, send us a message through the mailbag! We want to hear your challenges and would love to feature your scenario on the podcast.

Submit your questions here: unchartedvet.com/mailbag


Upcoming Events

DO NOT MISS OUT ON THIS WORKSHOP:

RECRUITING AND RETAINING MILLENNIALS with Dr. Tierra Price

Did you know millennials are currently the largest generation in the US and the largest generation currently in the veterinary workforce? If you’re hiring veterinarians for your practice, you need to know how to attract and retain this pool of talent!

Dr. Tierra Price has supported practice owners in creating successful applications geared toward millennial veterinarians. This experience, combined with her own experience in her recent job search as a new graduate, has led to a compilation of factors to consider in order to recruit and retain millennials in veterinary medicine!

In her workshop, we will cover:

 ⚓ Traits that characterize the millennial generation

 ⚓ Factors millennials consider when looking for jobs

 ⚓ How to build an irresistible job offer for millennials

Live and virtual, this interactive workshop provides an engaging learning experience. Join us and close 2023 with a positive move toward hiring your next great team member!

When: December 12, 2023, 1:00 pm – 3:00 pm ET / 10:00 am – 12:00 pm PT

$99 to register, FREE for Uncharted Members.

Upcoming events: unchartedvet.com/upcoming-events/


Episode Transcript

Stephanie Goss:
Before we get into the episode today, I just have to say a huge thank you. I would be remiss if I didn't take a chance to say that PLS, the Practice Leaders Summit, is happening in just a few short days, when you're listening to this podcast episode. And that means we are all getting together in Greenville, South Carolina to celebrate the unique and wonderful position that is being a leader in veterinary medicine. We're getting together with some of the best and brightest practice owners, practice managers, and we are talking about the real challenges that face us when we run our practices day-to day.
And I am super, super excited. And this is a very different event. It is small, it is boutique, it is designed so that everybody who comes gets to meet every single other attendee that is there. We get to talk about the nitty-gritty in real time, about the challenges that we're facing as practices, the wins that we have with our teams, and really set a plan for the new year so that we can walk into 2024 set up for success.
And we couldn't do it without our industry partners. And we have some amazing ones this year. And I just want to take a second to say thank you from the bottom of our Uncharted hearts to our Anchor Club sponsors. We have different level partners, and we've got a lot of amazing ones, but this group, these guys, are fantastic. They stepped up in a big way and helped make us successful in terms of throwing the Uncharted events for you and your team. And I just want to say thanks. So to Nationwide Pet Insurance, Hill's Pet Nutrition, and Total Practice Solutions Group, thank you, thank you, thank you for being Anchor Club sponsors. Thank you for letting us go out on a limb, try some new and crazy things, like our Practice Leader Summit and for coming to Greenville and having a good time with us.
Okay, now we can start the podcast.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Hey everybody, welcome to the Uncharted Veterinary Podcast. I'm your host, Dr. Andy Roark.
Guys, I got a special one for you today. Dr. Erica Pounds is joining me to take a question about multi-site management. So if you don't know Dr. Erica Pounds, you're about to because she is amazing. I've been working with her for a couple of years. She is an incredible leader and trainer and teacher and she came to us through one of our Uncharted corporate programs. If you have a multi-site practice, we actually do programs specifically for multi-site practices. And she came to us that way and then she sort of moved up through the programs that we've done and now she's in our Train the Trainer Program where we work with multi-site leaders to be facilitators and managers across multiple locations and to help grow and develop other doctors.
And so anyway, she just continues to excel and be just such a rock star. And so I was like, “Hey, I love your insight on these topics, specifically multi-site management. Can you come in and break this one down with me and let's give Stephanie Goss a break?” And she did, and, boy, she crushed it. So anyway, this is a great episode. If you have ever wondered about managing multiple hospitals and kind of keeping them on the same page, you're going to really like this episode. So without further ado, let's get into it.

Speaker 3:
And now the Uncharted Podcast.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Welcome to the Podcast, Dr. Erica Pounds. How are you?

Dr. Erica Pounds:
I'm good, how are you?

Dr. Andy Roark:
I am so good. Thanks for coming on and doing this with me. I really appreciate your time. For those who don't know you, you are an Area Chief of Staff with Banfield. You have a passion for training and educating in leadership and communication. You and I have worked together for about three years now.

Dr. Erica Pounds:
I know.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Through one of our corporate programs that we have at Uncharted. And so you have been my wingman in a number of workshops and lectures and I just admire you. And I had a question that came into our mailbag that I thought, “I think Erica would be really insightful in this question.” And so I wanted to pull you in. Is that okay?

Dr. Erica Pounds:
Yeah, that sounds great. I'm super excited.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Awesome. So the question that came in was about consistent discipline across supervisors. So the question that was, it was from a manager, and this manager is part of a multi-site practice, so they've got a number of locations. And it seems like they're, again, this is me kind of reading between the lines in the question, it seemed like they're sort of a fairly young corporation that's got a couple of different locations, and there's starting to be a push inside their organization for consistency in discipline across locations.
So imagine that you've got, let's make it easy, I'm just going to say three locations, which is probably much smaller, but it's easy enough to hold in our minds to kind of work with. So imagine you've got three locations. And you're starting to get some pushback in one location where they say, “Well, you guys are much stricter on us over here and over at the other location they're getting away with a lot more. And we think that there should be consistency in how people get in trouble.” And so the question that came in is, “Is this a thing? Should we do this? How do we do this? What does this even look like?”
And so that's kind of the question that was asked. So let me just pause here for a second and kind put that to you and say when you hear this question, what are your first thoughts? I mean how many hospitals do you oversee right now?

Dr. Erica Pounds:
Yeah, so right now, just as we just recently moved, I'm down to one, but I've had as many as four at a time.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Okay.

Dr. Erica Pounds:
So three is a very real number that a lot of people in our position work with and this is very much a thing. Certainly as you move hospitals and you're coming in as that brand new leader to that location, you could deal with those differing opinions about the way in which maybe your previous leader led. Or if they know your other hospital locations to that point, “Well over there, that's not a thing. So why are you being so strict over here?”

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah. No, I think you're right. I hadn't really thought about a leader coming in, because way the question was framed up was this is something. Again, I suspect these were practices that were acquired and are kind of coming together underneath an umbrella, but the idea of, “Our last boss, our last manager, treated us this way and now here you are and I bet the other managers don't treat us or don't push this hard, they're not so strict or whatever.” I think all of that makes sense.
Let's start it at a headspace standpoint and just say, “Okay, we're starting to get some questions that people are saying, ‘Hey, why aren't we more consistent?'” And again, it's funny because this is specifically about discipline. It's like “When we get in trouble here, it's different than we get in trouble over there or we feel like we get in trouble faster or things like that.” So yeah, let's go ahead. When you start to just look at this and you're a leader coming in and somebody says to you, “Erica, we're thinking about trying to standardize discipline across our hospitals.” Where do you start from a headspace?

Dr. Erica Pounds:
Yeah, so I think kind of in two different camps. So I think that there's the systems piece of how in the world do we actually do this? What's our process? What does it look like from the step one all the way through to an end point? And then I think there's the people piece. So not only is it going to be the leader and individual that you're going to be having this conversation with, but it also has to do with the team's perception of how accountability is handled within the practice.
And I think a lot of times the team's perception around accountability really becomes a make it or break it as far as the culture around what that looks like and whether or not people are going to perceive these conversations as punitive and truly disciplinary or if they're going to take on, “This is because this leader wants me to grow. And right now there is something that is standing in my way of reaching my full potential and I have an opportunity to be able to course correct.” And so I think that really is where I center on with that discussion.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Okay. I love this. I think 100% from headspace there's something about accountability here we want to unpack. You put your finger on a little bit of it too. I think, and again, I don't want to be critical at all here, but when people start saying, “What is our disciplinary process?” My first thought is, “How often are you disciplining people? How big a deal is this?” As opposed to, “Hey, we've got some opportunity for improvement here. And we're going to work on your development plan.” And that framing of the issue, it may sound silly where there's a way of saying, when my kids make a mistake and they drop the ball, let's just say that my youngest daughter who's about to get her driver's license just blows curfew. She can get in trouble and be penalized or we could talk to her about a learning opportunity and a potential for growth and those things are often rolled together. But everybody can tell the difference in tone and how the culture feels when people are concerned about getting in trouble and other people getting in trouble versus being held accountable and how we grow and develop and push for improvement.
That's the first thing that gets into my head a little bit. I think it's really interesting, we started talking about their feelings about accountability, and I think that there's probably a diagnostic piece there first to be like, “Okay, where is this really coming from?” And just things that pop up into my head immediately, it's funny. There's people who they're worried about them getting in trouble and then they're also worried about other people getting away with stuff that they don't get away with. And I'm like, “What are we talking about here? Are you worried that the other practices are not applying themselves like you are? That they're on easy street and you're not? Is it that you feel like you're being held to a standard the other practices are not being held to? And what does that look like and what does that mean?”
And I think one of the first things you really have to do is try to get into this a little bit because, especially when you have multiple locations, people want to speak in big generalities. Like, “We need to hold people accountable.” And I go, “What exactly are we talking about here?” Because otherwise it's all theoretical hand waving of accountability and go, “What exactly is it? Was there a case where some person was written up for a behavior in another place? It happens all the time and nobody says anything. Is that what we're talking about?” Because I would say that the problems may not be consistency and discipline, but rather consistency in performance of those hospitals. I think you have hospitals that are not performing the same. And then the discipline will take care of itself if we fix the performance issue.
So there's a lot of stuff like that around where I'm like, “Be wary of going straight down to how do we punish people?” I just think that that's just dark bloody business. And then the other part is like, “What are we really talking about here?” I think it's also from a leader standpoint, I think another part of my headspace would be, just to throw this out at the very beginning, is the empathy component of, “Where's this coming from and how are they feeling?”
Fairness is a big deal for a lot of people and it would be very easy to look at this and say, “Well, this is just kind of silly. This person got in trouble here and this person just didn't get in so much trouble.” But the truth is there's a bunch of backstory here and the circumstances were all a bit different. And so this is just silly. And I go, “Well, perception of fairness to your point is really important.” And if the perception is that these hospitals are not the same and they're not being treated the same, that can affect people at an emotional level, that can make them sort of abandon rationality. And you end up with an absolute mutiny over nothing except people's feelings. And so I think you got to manage that.

Dr. Erica Pounds:
Yeah, for sure. Because the fairness perspective, again, I think we use our kids a lot as examples. And my oldest, he is a firstborn through and through, so his feelings of what is fair, what is just, is oh my stars. And I have to use that logic sometimes with the teams that I oversee because, again, you're going to have some people that you're never going to hear anything out of them. If they have a team member that perhaps is not carrying their weight one day, you'll never hear anything out of them. They're just going to do it, and potentially when you talk to them, they are going to do what we hope that everyone would do, is assuming that positive intent, that person did not wake up that day and say, “I'm just going to suck at my job today and make everyone's life miserable.” But they're like, “Something's going on with my teammate. I'm going to pick up the slack. It's okay.”
And then you're going to have the others that are like, “This is absolutely not fair. If I'm doing all of these things, why is this person not? And what are you going to do about it?” And they don't take the time to go, “Is there something more going on here?” Because oftentimes when you get into these conversations with the team, you end up finding out that there's something else that is driving the behavior response. They again, most people do not just say, “I'm just not going to do that because I don't feel like it.” There's often is it that they, did we check for understanding? Do they even understand their job role? Do they even understand what we're asking them to do? Do they have the ability to do what we ask them to do? There's so many things that you have to unpack when somebody is either not doing what we ask them to do or just failing to execute on performance.
But for the team, do they have the skill to be able to have that conversation or do they need to? No, but us as leaders, we're here to help manage that so that we can say, “It is going to be fair. We are going to be fair and mutual across the board when it comes to accountability conversations. And this is the way that this is going to look.”

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah. No, I think that that's really important. I want to go back to, you mentioned the team's perception of accountability. I think that's really important is there should be some consistency. Also, managing perception is often different from fixing a problem. It's like the way that they think about it or the way that they perceive it, it may not be accurate. And that happens a lot. There's a lot of people who are like, “Oh, that person gets away with everything.” And the truth is they don't. Or especially across hospitals, there's a lot of storytelling that gets done.

Dr. Erica Pounds:
So much.

Dr. Andy Roark:
It's like, “You're not there. You didn't see what happened. You invented details that were not true.” There's just so much of that. And I think one of the frustrating truths of leadership is, especially across multiple facilities, is you want to, and in a way you're right, but you want to say, “It's not your problem what happens over there and it's not your business.”
And that's true. And if you say that they will often continue to tell themselves stories and wind this up and you're going to end up with a massive human issue that you have to deal with, that my very logical people absolutely struggle with. They're like, “None of this makes sense. It's not their business.” It's like, “All of that's true. Do you want to be right or do you want to be effective?” Because you can be right and just hold what you got. Or you can be effective and figure out how to wade into this and help adjust perspective so that people can feel okay and kind of see more that this is not radically different.
I wanted to go back to the first thing that you said when you talked about the systems piece. And this is the thing that I'm really interested to hear from you on because I've wrestled with this for a long time. Okay, so let me lay out a thesis and I want you to punch it full of holes. Okay? All right.
I believe that in management, especially across multiple locations, we all want control. And as you add more people, and especially as you add more locations, your level of control, of direct control, it keeps going down. You're less of the sailor with this tiny little sailboat where you can grab all the ropes and more of this admiral of a fleet and there's multiple boats going different ways. You know what I mean? And they take longer to turn by far and just the immediate control you have just goes down less and less and less, as far as being able to grab the wheel and turn things. So I think a lot of people have that experience. And when people have that experience, there are forces, there are business gurus, there are consultants, there's just probably our innate desire to have control that say, “We need more systems. You need protocols. You need more rules because I'm losing control and I need to keep control, so I want to make more rules.” And when I say rules, I'm talking about protocols and checklists and things like that.
And they go that way, and of course if you are expanding and you're not adding in systems and you're not adding in protocols, you are setting yourself up for absolute disaster. But my thesis comes in here where I say, at some level you can go too far with systems and protocols. When you get down to the place where there is a protocol for someone to ask a question at a staff meeting, I'm like, “Do we really need to go that far down the order hole? Do we need that level?” Or can we just at some point say, “You know what? We've got systems that get us 90% of the way and then 10% of the way we're going to let people be autonomous. We're going to hire smart people. We're going to talk to them about why we're doing what we're doing. And we're going to let them make choices and have some flexibility on the ground to accommodate the specific people they're managing, their clientele, the way that they want to work, what they think is important, what their values are, what their vision is and stuff like that.”
So, yeah, that's kind of where I've gone over time is the push towards rules is interesting and the protocols is interesting and I think at the macro level it's good. But I do think that there is a tipping point where we start to make things, we take away people's freedom to make calls on the ground based on the nuance of the situation and who's involved and what their strengths are and what wishes and desires of the people they're managing are. I think we take that away.
The other part is, I think it's sort of funny is, when people are talking about managing other people, they're very pro rules. They're like, “Yep, we should have rules.” But when they themselves are being managed.

Dr. Erica Pounds:
They do not want those rules.

Dr. Andy Roark:
They do not want endless rules because then that's being micromanaged, right? I remember doctors, when we first started to see corporate medicine or multi-site practices and stuff in vet medicine, boy, the doctors really raged against what was called cookbook medicine and “Don't tell me how to do it. I don't want to follow this recipe.” And it was a strong pushback of, “Don't take away my autonomy,” is really what it was. And so I feel that from a management standpoint on some degrees of you can have some consistency, but I do think if you ever got to a point where everything was written down in a protocol form, that would be a miserable place to work work and people would hate it. So all right, that's my thesis. Shoot it full of holes. Am I right? Am I off? Where does this break down?

Dr. Erica Pounds:
Yeah, so I think for the vast part of that, you're spot on. Because, as leaders, and we could all think of times like this, where maybe you're not getting the potential outcome that perhaps your line managers or those that you're reporting to are wanting, and so here comes a way to track your progress and a way to do this and a way to do that and a way to do this and a way to do that.
And we're not all the same. To your point, the nuances within a hospital context as you're leading them is going to look different. There have been so many times where I will have hospitals that are on polar opposite ends of the spectrum. This one is struggling with this while this one is a player and vice versa. And so if I sit here and I just say, “I'm going to do the exact same thing in both hospitals.” Well I'm going to get nowhere because the people that are doing well on this hand now feel micromanaged, and the people that are over here, again, they might not have the skill or ability or understand what I'm even asking them to do because their contexts are so different. And so with leaders, I think that there is a balance in which you can have enough of a structure and enough of a system that you know here's step one to step two, to step three, to step four. However, you're given the freedom and the ability to lead the way that you need to lead for your hospitals.
There have been times before where I might be in a situation and I'm like, “Well, I could proceed boom, boom, boom, boom. Step 1, 2, 3. And we're going to go straight through. I do not think that that is the right call here.” Because if I'm leading my people well and I know what is going on with them, I know what their motivators are, I know what is disengaging to them. When I really take that holistic picture into this, is going straight through a disciplinary action protocol just like it is on paper, is that the right call? Or is this an opportunity for me to do a very, very, very, very important step here, which is to take partnership and manage up to those that you report to of, “Hey, here is the situation. As I take this all into perspective, this is how I want to handle this situation and these are the outcomes that I am looking for in this timeframe. If that doesn't happen, absolutely we're going to check and adjust and we're going to dial it back, but I really feel, as I'm leading in this context, this is the way that we need to go.”

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah. Okay. So let me say this back to you, and again, we're still sort of in a headspace and really right now we're sort of talking about management across multiple hospitals, which I always think it's interesting.
So would you agree that when we start getting into action steps here, I think that there's more about management of hospital leadership in individual locations then there is about management from the manager down to the staff below. And so what I'm saying is this, I'm completely in agreement with you here. You started talking about objectives and you say, “Okay, great. So let's say that I'm the practice manager, I'm the medical director, in one of these hospitals.” There's a situation. I'm going to communicate up, “Hey, this is how I plan to handle this and these are the outcomes that I'm looking for.” And I think the outcomes that I'm looking for are absolutely really critical because when we start talking about standardizing disciplinary actions, we're talking about processes, and standardizing processes, and there's no flexibility there at all.
I am a much bigger fan, and this is kind of where I'm going to go when we get into action steps a bit more of saying, “What is the outcomes that we're trying to achieve and then how do we manage those outcomes? And if a practice is not getting those outcomes, we need to lean on the leadership in that practice so we need to support those people, we need to make sure that they have clear expectations of what's going on.
So for example, let's say that in Hospital A people get penalized pretty harshly if they don't show up for work or they show up late for work. But at Hospital B, they don't seem to get penalized for showing up late for work and it's much more lackadaisical. And the people in Hospital A are frustrated with that. I get that. I'm not convinced that making a formal process that says, “Hospital A has got to write up people if they're late, no ifs, ands, or buts.” I think the actual play is to go to Hospital A and say, “Hey, we're looking at these metrics which are absenteeism, it's tardiness, it's things like that. And you guys are really winding this up in a way that we don't have at our other hospitals. What's the plan for getting this back on track?”
And then I can say to the people at the other hospital who are starting to complain and say, “Hey, you know what? This is being addressed. I don't know how they found out that this was actually a systemic problem, but if they did, this is being addressed. We're going to work on it.” But I would push back and say, “I don't think that standardizing discipline for people who are late is the answer.” I think it's talking to hospital leadership and saying, “Great. This is where we are with our other practice. You can see that you're a significant outlier here. You guys know your team, you know how you lead, you know what your styles are. I don't really care how you do it. I just need you to come in line with the other practices. Let's work together and come up with a plan. And you can think about it, come back. I'll think about it. We'll come together. I'll try to support you.” But I think that's how your regional leadership supports your practice leadership there. But I don't know, does that track with where you were going?

Dr. Erica Pounds:
Yeah, absolutely. Because I think the biggest part of any conversation, whether you're talking to a whole hospital unit or whether you're talking on that individual basis, if you just go in and you're like, “You're not meeting this performance standard.” And again, that could be a whole spectrum of things from showing up for work on time to performance operations, but if you just go in and you're like, “You're not meeting this. This is what we're doing. You're getting written up,” and all that. That's not going to necessarily give you the outcome. Now they're doing it out of fear versus really understanding and having this belief in what you are trying to accomplish.
And so if we miss the checking for understanding point, if we do not go in from a curiosity state and say, “Hey, I noticed XYZ. I'd love for you to just say a little bit more about what's going on.” There's so much power in say more and then just sit back. Because that is often where then that human aspect, now we get the context, now we get the backstory, now we're understanding what's driving the behavior. And then we can solve for that. If we're solving sheerly off of some type of number or some type of goal, we run the risk of getting it completely wrong, disengaging the individual and the process, having the team thinking that we're not following up on anything, and here we are in a muteness situation where we have now zero control because it's just gone off the rails.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah. No, I like that a lot too. And I think you're also spot on about how we motivate. I've heard the quote, and I can't remember where it was, but it's basically like, “If you motivate someone with fear of getting in trouble, they're going to do just enough to not get in trouble.” They're going to check that box to avoid the punishment and they're going to go on. And if we go in and we talk to them about what we're trying to accomplish and we try to get them to buy into where we're going and motivate and praise and positively reinforce and celebrate, we can get them to go above and beyond that.
All right, I want to square this sort of headspace with you a little bit because I like your position on measuring and overusing those sort of numbers of measurement. So I think when I look at this and we're about to go into action steps here, but when we start talking about our action steps, to me part of it's got to be, what are we trying to accomplish? And so do you think that when we say, “Okay, what are we trying to accomplish in this hospital?” How critical are setting objectives and measurements for that?
So for example, we talked about tardiness. And that's an easy one. You just look at when people clock in and when they're supposed to clock in and you can figure out a tardiness rate or measure, whatever. But when we're talking about providing the client experience, if we're surveying our clients and we're getting client feedback, that's something. When we talk about having a good staff culture, if we're doing employee engagement surveys to see how engaged people are, I think that's good. And then we also look at our retention. But I think that looking at numbers like that to say, “Okay, we've got lower engagement at this location. We've got lower retention at this location.” I don't know that going in and standardizing punitive behaviors inside that location is going to be nearly as effective as saying, “All right, what's going on holistically? And let's look at this.” But I still think that those measurements are really important. Do you line up with that or do you think I'm overstating the importance of these metrics?

Dr. Erica Pounds:
No, I think they're incredibly important. And the hard thing is, is that we are constantly, especially as medical leaders but operational leaders too, but as medical leaders, we are always walking this tightrope and this balance line of discussing a metric or a number or a measure, versus a lot of times the medical team, you will hear them often say, “Oh, all you talk about is numbers, blah blah, blah.” And they will all of a sudden hackles up and they can't hear anything that you say because, “Here we are. You're just measuring where we are again, and you're not looking at other things. It's just our ability to hit a metric.”
And I think that the way in which I use this with my doctors all of the time, and I think we use this with the outcomes that we'll talk about in the action steps with this too, you can use it in the same token. How do I know that a patient is healthy? As a doctor? Well, I do an exam. We're observing the team. We're taking in the information and all the things. And then I'm going to do diagnostics to back up my assessment and to help me know that I'm right. And those diagnostics are going to be lab work, they're going to be a fecal exam, urinalysis, so on and so forth. And guess what? All of those are numbers. And those numbers are super important indicators to me to let me know the health of that patient or where I need to press in.
And so the same thing goes when we are looking at metrics and measures and the way in which we help to translate that to the team. How do I know that our team is healthy? Well, if I never ask you an engagement question, I'm sheerly going off of the way that I feel, but I have nothing to actually validate that and say, “We're a very healthy, highly functioning team.” We could say that to kingdom come, but if we can't back it up, then again, how do we actually know?
And so I think a big piece that I think we'll hit on in a little bit for the team is this perception of follow-up. If you're going to hold somebody accountable, how do we know that you held them accountable? Do you actually see the follow-up? And so I think when we're talking with the teams as well of the overarching theme of disciplinary or accountability conversations, the measure point afterwards is the way in which we know that we even make any movement forward. Otherwise we're just going to sit and spin our wheels. So I do think the measures play a huge role in how effective these conversations are.

Dr. Andy Roark:
All right. I like this a lot. I think you're laying this out really nicely. Let's take a quick break and then we're going to come back and let's just get into our action steps. And I know we're sort of talking in general terms of how do we set this up, but I think you and I have kind of laid out where we're coming down and it's going to be a balance of some accountability work, but it's a balance is going to be of systems and then also asking people questions that's going to give them some autonomy to fix what's inside their own specific clinic. So let's take a break and we'll come back.

Stephanie Goss:
Hey, friends. What are you doing on Tuesday, December 12th from 1:00 to 3:00 PM Eastern? So that would be 10:00 to 12:00 Pacific. If your answer was nothing or taking my lunch break or having a few minutes of free time or you would like to join in an awesome webinar that we are hosting, well, you should head over to unchartedvet.com/events because we have the wonderful and amazingly talented Dr. Tierra Price joining us. For those of you who have not had the pleasure, Tierra is a all around wonderful human being. She is a practicing veterinarian. She is the founder of Black DVM Network and she is a superpower dynamo in veterinary medicine and she's going to lead another workshop for us. She did a keynote for us and is very impressive as a speaker and I'm super excited about this one because she is going to come talk about recruiting and retaining Millennials and Gen Z.
And so if any of you are hiring right now, and most of us probably put our hands up because who isn't, most of us are drawing from a talent pool that includes a lot of Millennials and Gen Z as they make their way into the workforce. And so I think it is really really important for us to talk about this topic and Tierra is going to bring it together for us before we're done with the year. So if you don't have anything on your calendar, add that right now and you can do it by heading over to unchartedvet.com/events and signing up. It's free, as always, to our Uncharted members and if you're not currently a community member, it's $99 for the workshop and we would love to see you there. And now back to the podcast.

Dr. Andy Roark:
All right, so I think this has been really good headspace. I like our thought patterns here. I think we've both sort of laid out concerns we have about going straight to disciplinary standardization versus other things. So we've laid all these things out and we've walked one way and then back the other way and I think we circled around and made this sufficiently muddy to bring across the nuance of the situation.
All right, so let's go ahead and start to talk about what we actually do from action steps. And so for me, I'm going to start with one that I always start with is clear expectations. I think if you don't communicate clear expectations to the leadership in the practice, in this individual practice of, “This is what we care about. And this is what's important. And these are the behavior standards of the staff that we expect. And this is how we expect our practice to run. And this is the experience that we expect to treat our clients with,” I think you're setting them up for failure.
And that may sound silly or redundant, but I see that a lot, especially when you have practices that are established that have come together under an umbrella. And I understand wanting to give those groups autonomy, but if you bring them in and say we're going to give them autonomy and we don't communicate expectations for them to strive toward, one, we can demotivate those people because hey don't know what they're supposed to do and they're kind of feeling lost. And then the other thing is we can make them really, really frustrated because all of a sudden we're coming down and saying, “Well, you're not holding people accountable for these things.” And they say, “I never knew that was a thing.”
I remember early in my career I was a brand new veterinarian, brand new veterinarian, and I ended up working at this startup satellite clinic and it was just me and a technician. And then we were out there for a couple of weeks on and off and all of a sudden I get kind of brought in and they're like, “Roark, you have not set up the surgery suite in this way and you haven't done these other things.” And this was all absolute news to me. And they were like, “Also, the technician has failed to do these things.” And I remember saying, “I'm sorry, am I her boss?” They were like, “No, you're not her boss, but you are being held accountable for these performance things,” that were news to me. I just remember how frustrated I was to say, “Look, you sent me out there to take care of the clients and I did. These other operational organizational things, they were never communicated to me, and now I'm being taken to task over them.”
So anyway, for me, it's just you got to figure out what is our clear expectations? What are we trying to accomplish overall? And is everybody on board with that and are they all communicating that? Because honestly, a lot of times if we can just communicate clear expectations, that's to the management, that's from the management down to the team, clear expectations oftentimes they make a lot of the disciplinary stuff go away because people go, “Oh, that's important and I didn't know it was important.” So anyway, that's where I'd start.

Dr. Erica Pounds:
Yeah, absolutely. Because the expectation piece, if they don't know what you're asking them to do, then how can you expect to hold them accountable to something that they had no clue about? And to your point, it was incredibly disengaging when they were like, “Hey, why aren't you doing these things?” And you're like, “Because I didn't know. No one ever had that conversation with me.” And so obviously this is a piece where we can get this wrong. And this is a spot where we as leaders have to really press into that vulnerability piece to say, “Guys, I messed this up. I got this a little wrong. Let's dial this back a little bit because I would like to reset some expectations.” So if you've already traveled down this path a little bit and you're not really getting the results that you need, this is the point where you can be like, “It's okay, I can dial it back.” Because we're all going to do that at some point in time across laying down expectations.
I think too, this is another really good place to really help the team to understand what is being accomplished when you're having to have these follow-up conversations. Again, if we're coming from a place of disciplinary action, disciplinary action will always evoke this negative kind of connotation and, “This seems punitive and I'm going to get punished and I'm in trouble,” and all of these things. And that can set up that space where, “This is not a psychologically safe environment anymore. If I'm so fearful that I'm going to get written up about something, if I make a mistake, am I going to come forward and say, ‘Hey, my bad. I messed this up.' Or am I going to be so fearful that that's going to result in me getting written up that I'm going to say nothing?” And that is not a good space to live in.
So really helping the team to understand as you lay down these expectations, “When we're talking about accountability, this is because we care about each other as a team. I care about you as your leader. I care enough to have a difficult conversation with you so that you can grow and achieve your highest potential. This is all because I care about you.” And I think in every single conversation that I have, if it's small or if it's something larger, I always lead with that. “Hey, we're going to chat today. I'm going to give you some feedback. Always, know that as I give you this feedback, this is coming from a place of caring. I care about you and I want to check in because I'm seeing X, Y, and Z happen. Can you share a little bit about what's going on?”
And creating that space for them to be then able to talk. And I think as we set the expectations, if we can lay that as the groundwork of, “This is how our practice is going to function around accountability,” I think that then that will help to open up that feeling of grace from the team of like, “This is a safe space to grow.” Even if it's a tough conversation.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Well, You did so many things in that beautifully. So I love the phrasing. I love the word choice. I love the psychological safety of, “Tet's talk about this.” I think that that dove tails into the next step for me, which is the shift in focus a little bit to outcomes. And so what it means is I like to try to figure out how to move away from being punitive and more developmental. Meaning, without knowing specific behaviors it's hard to lay this down and say, “This is the outcome I would look for.” But basically, what are we trying to accomplish, what is our mission, and where are we trying to go? And then what I would say is, “How is this behavior detrimental to the outcome that we're trying to achieve?”
And let me be really clear here, and you and I sort of touched on this a little bit earlier in the first half I think, is people do not want to hear about their revenue generation numbers. That's not an outcome I'm talking about. They don't want to hear about it. They don't care about it. If absenteeism is causing us to have high wait times and our clients, they're just waiting. If our staff is feeling burned out and stressed and doctors are working through lunch and we're having to really watch people to make sure they get their lunch breaks and things and push them out the door, those are the outcomes that I'm going to focus on rather than, “Hey, you really screwed up.” It's, “Hey, these things are really important and we need to make these things happen going forward.”
And so a lot of times, again, I really like to push things into the future tense as opposed to the past tense. So when we talk about discipline, we're talking about how you messed up yesterday versus development is, “Hey, what are we going to do different in the future to make sure this doesn't happen?” And then if it continues to happen, ultimately we may have to have disciplinary conversations, but it's going to be, “Hey, if we have disciplinary conversations, it will be because we've talked about this a number of times and your behavior's not changing and we are not accomplishing this thing that's really important to us.”
And so anyway, it's just a way of starting to frame that up, but starting to switch to the outcomes. What are we trying to accomplish? And then make sure that your clinic leadership knows what the outcomes are that you're trying to accomplish, and then make sure that the staff knows, and that they know it and it's framed in a way that they know, “This is about providing great healthcare. This is about having a great culture and taking care of each other and taking care of patients.” And so getting those outcomes out there where everybody can see them and see how behaviors interface with those outcomes, I think that that's really important.

Dr. Erica Pounds:
I think that sometimes the hard ones will be for our intangible outcomes, so to speak. So I don't know how many times we have all as leaders, and the conversation is not necessarily about somebody's quantifiable performance, but it has to do with their attitude, and it has to do perhaps with the way in which they're interacting with the team. So it becomes this interpersonal dynamic that sometimes is causing breakdowns, then inefficiency and communication and the success towards the day. And I think a lot of times as we are trying to provide accountability and coaching and development in those situations, being able to try to work with that individual to say, “This is the situation. This is what we have seen. How are you feeling about that?” And then also really involving them in the process of like, “If we were to work on this for the next two weeks, what does success look like to you?” When we don't have that quantifiable measure, how are we going to know that we even got anywhere?
I think a lot of times I think about doctors that get very stressed in surgery and the teams will say, “This doctor, they are being so mean to me. They're not talking to me.” And it's all about their perception of maybe the doctor's tone as they're directing at that time and these kinds of things. And when you really drill that down, the doctor is not meaning to be that way towards the team. They just have other things on their mind. But we still have to address this situation. And so sometimes it's those outcomes and those action steps for this individual of how do we signpost for the team? How do we engage them in a conversation to say, “Hey, this is nothing to do with you guys today. I just need to stay a little focused right now and then we'll be able to kind of move on.” Because I find that often when I am trying to have conversations, the quantifiable measures and the quantifiable performance outcomes, those are the easy conversations. The hard ones are the people piece and the interpersonal dynamics.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah, I agree with that. I think those are also really hard to put disciplinary actions around. As much as I would like for people to get in trouble for not getting along, that is an absolute quagmire to get bogged down in. It very quickly turns into the old, “The beatings will continue until morale improves.”

Dr. Erica Pounds:
Yes.

Dr. Andy Roark:
And it just goes right to that. And again, trust me, I get it. Emotionally, I get it. It's so frustrating when you're trying to balance, again, interpersonal stuff. And punishment is a very hard tool to use in this regard. You can lean into giving people feedback and you can have conversations and you can look for patterns of behaviors and you can start to call things out in a nice and supportive way. And then measure progress, I think is where we were getting to, is starting to watch how we're doing. And if we continue to fall back and we're saying, “Hey, I don't know what happened. I wasn't there. You've told me what happened. But we talked about this two weeks ago about you and Michael not getting along. And now here we are again with you and Michael having these problems. And the problem doesn't seem to be getting better and we're going to need to start making some adjustments.”
We've got to be able to have those, as you said, the signposts of, how is it going, where are we going from here, and things like that. I still, I'm a big believer that you've got to give leaders on the ground some autonomy to fix the problem. And you can only build protocols and systems that go so far down before they really start to become handcuffs that take people's enjoyment away and also that don't account for nuance and just become things that people fight about. So I think that's a big part of it. And so I would go from there, I think, and this is where I would really start to look at this issue, I think a lot is, we need to be having a good relationship from above with our site managers and having expectations for them and then having accountability conversations with them.
And when I say accountability, again, I don't want to go back to the idea that the manager should get in trouble because their people aren't doing what they're supposed to be doing. It's what are we trying to talk about? Does this person have a clear view of what success looks like? Do they know how they're doing and how they're performing? Do they understand the strengths of their team? Do they understand the weaknesses of their team? Do they have support that they need to try to address the weaknesses? Because a lot of us don't know. We struggle in this area and it's probably something that I'm not innately good at, which is why I don't know exactly how to fix it. I don't think there's any shame in that. That's just being a human being and recognizing that we've all got different strengths and skill sets.
I mean, there's people that you could bring into your practice who would immediately look at your systems and your protocols and say, “Oh, we can fix this and this and this.” And I'm not that guy. But I can wade into a practice where people are arguing, we've got some interpersonal stuff, we have a sense of people are unengaged or they're detached and I can bring them back and get them excited about the work and I can generally kind of push them into getting to work together and come together as a group. But I'm not your operations guy and if you've got an operations problem, you may have to support me in that because that's not my natural strength or skill set.

Dr. Erica Pounds:
I think that that's the hard part right, though, for us as leaders is you do have to get to that point of being comfortable. To your point, there's no shame in saying, “Hey, this is a space that I don't feel that natural tendency to be able to lead in. I feel uncomfortable in these situations.” And being able to go ahead and reach out for help. I mean, quite honestly, we joke about this all of the time, my husband and I, because in my personal life I will avoid conflict like the plague. Like, “Nope. Absolutely not. Let me walk away. They can just chill out. It's okay. I'll come back later.” But I will avoid conflict. At work, I'm like, “Hey, everything cool? I feel like something's going on here. Let's go ahead and chat about it.”
And my husband all the time, if he comes by to pick me up for lunch or something like that, there's been a couple of times where he has observed the, “Hey, what's going on?” And he was like, “Who is this person?” And I'm like, “Well, the thing is is that that was something that when I was a leader early on, I really had to work on getting comfortable with the uncomfortable, getting comfortable to have that difficult conversation.” But again, as we've talked about many times during this conversation, my viewpoint and my vantage point going into these conversations as a manager is key to the way in which I'm going to feel in that situation.
If I'm going in saying that I'm going to have to get somebody in trouble, I'm going to struggle really, really hard because that conflict aversion is going to come out some kind of fierce. However, if I go in and I'm like, “this is because I care about you. This is for your development. I see something in you and we need to hone it and we need to refine it, and this is how we're going to do this together,” all of the sudden that's my space that I'm comfortable in and I can have that conversation and I can help them and we can get to the outcomes that we need to.
So for me, that was a huge thing of this is not a space that I feel comfortable in. This is not a space that I feel good in. But I was able to say, “Hey, I need help with this,” and have been able to work on it. And again, that vantage point of going into the conversation is going to have a huge impact on how the conversation goes.

Dr. Andy Roark:
I just want to give you an amen. You just spoke directly to my experience as well. It's exact same thing. I don't like conflict. I like to be popular, with my team, and I want them to like me and to working for me, and that means a lot to me. And I feel like they don't like working for me? That's a hard burden for me. I don't handle that well. And so I also, I struggled so much with holding people accountable until I was able to frame it in my mind as, “I'm helping you, because if I don't say something to you, this behavior's going to continue because no one's going to say anything and you're going to keep doing it. And it's probably going to get worse and ultimately you're going to end up getting fired, or this place is going to become a toxic swamp and we're going to continue to fail and there's going to be this other punishments that come down or these negative repercussions or the clients are going to be upset and then I'm going to have to deal with them.”
But ultimately I came to the place where you sort of pick your poison. Do you say something which is uncomfortable or do you not say something? And I guess part of it was just the experience of saying, “Oh, I now know what that path looks like and it is equally bad or generally worse.” But I really love the way that you frame it. You're exactly right. In my mind when I give someone feedback, it's because I care about them and I'm trying to help them and I'm trying to move them forward. And if I had to frame it in my own mind of I'm going to have to punish this person. I really don't want to do that. And I would also really struggle with that. It would take a lot of enjoyment out of it for me.
And here's the other thing too, is I don't know how to say to somebody, “Hey, I'm saying this to you because I care about you. And also can you sign this piece of paper that says that you accept the terms of this reprimand or whatever?” It kills so much of what I'm trying to build as far as a good work culture. So anyway, I am right there with you. I really love it.
The last thing I'll tell you, I had this really wonderful conversation over the weekend. And I asked a very thoughtful veterinarian who lives in California and she's so successful and she's just so wonderful. And we were hanging out together. It was sort of a retreat that we did. And there's a number of us there. And I asked her, ‘Do you think that people change?” I said, “Do you think that people change?” And she thought about it for a while and she said, “No.” She said, “I think that you are who you are. You are the person that you were when you were a child. However, we learn how to show up differently in different situations and at different times in our life. So in your essence, you are the same person you've always been, but you do learn how to show up. And the way that you show up can change depending on who you're with and what you're doing and where you are.”
And so when you were telling the story of being conflict averse, but then when you're there, you say, “Hey, can we talk about this?” I say, “You, Erica Pounds, are the same person you always have been, but you have learned how to show up in this role in a way that's effective and it works.” And so I just wanted to call that out because I think a lot of people see themselves as leaders or managers and they say, “Man, this is not who I am. I really struggle with this.” And I would say, ` And I don't know, that really spoke to me. So I thought it was really great.
Any way, Dr. Erica Pounds, thank you so much for being here. You are amazing. I really appreciate you talking through all this with me. Guys, everybody else, thanks for tuning in and listening. I hope you got something out out of it. Take care of yourselves, everybody.
And that's it. That's the episode. That's what I got for you guys. Thanks to Erica Pounds for being here. She is amazing, as you know. If you like the podcast, if you get a lot out of it, do me a favor and do all the stuff you're supposed to do for podcasts that you like. And mostly that's tell your friends, text, share the episode with them, and write us an honest review wherever you get your podcast. If there's a five star button, hit that button. And it just means the world to me and Stephanie and everybody on the Uncharted team. So anyway, guys, that's what I got for you. Thanks for being here. I'll talk to you soon.

Written by Maria Pirita · Categorized: Blog, Podcast · Tagged: behavior, communication, culture, doctor, management

Jun 07 2023

Are We Still Doing Non-Competes?

This week on the podcast…

This week on the Uncharted Podcast, Dr. Andy Roark and practice management geek Stephanie Goss are in the mailbag with a question that might just light this episode on fire. An associate vet who is thinking ahead to owning their own practice is asking if they are nuts for considering throwing away the non-compete option someday as a practice owner. Especially when they view it in light of their own personal experience trying to separate from a toxic practice they found themselves in! Andy and Stephanie have some fairly strong opinions on this one so hang on folks, let's get into this…

Uncharted Veterinary Podcast · UVP – 235 – Are We Still Doing Non – Competes?

You can also listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music or wherever you get your podcasts.

Submit your questions here: unchartedvet.com/mailbag


Upcoming Events

June 21, 2023: Teaching Strategies That Foster Team Learning and Development with Josh Lucas

This event is for Uncharted Members. Learn more about teaching strategies for your team from former teacher-turned-practice-manager Josh Lucas. This is a members-only event. Join the Community for more content like this coming soon!

July 1, 2023: Effective & Efficient Team Meetings with Maria Pirita

Have you ever felt like your team would benefit from meeting more often, or maybe a little less often? Do you struggle to find techniques that truly make your team meetings effective? Find the right balance in this workshop.


Episode Transcript

Stephanie Goss:
Hey, everybody, I am Stephanie Goss and this is another episode of the Uncharted Podcast. This week we're diving into the mail bag, but we're picking out a letter. This one was kind of handpicked because I had a wonderful time talking about this exact topic with some of my peers last week at our Uncharted April Veterinary conference. So we're recording this, this isn't coming out until the end of May, but I was having this conversation about non-competes and feeling pretty fiery about it and lo and behold, there was something in the queue from the mail bag from an associate vet who is asking the question, “Am I kind of on planet crazy to consider one day, when I own my own practice, not having non-compete be a thing in that practice?” Andy and I have some strong thoughts on this topic, so let's get into this one, shall we?

Speaker 2:
And now the Uncharted Podcast.

Andrew Roark:
And we are back. It's me, Dr. Andy Roark and Stephanie, a kiss is not a contract, Goss.

Stephanie Goss:
That time you weren't ready.

Andrew Roark:
No, I… Okay. I was like, “Yeah, no, we're going.” And then I didn't. I double took. Yeah, A Kiss is Not a Contract actually is a song by Flight of the Conchords who I love.

Stephanie Goss:
I've not heard from those guys in a hot minute.

Andrew Roark:
Oh no. I still listen to the classics. Business time, still makes me just laugh.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh man.

Andrew Roark:
Oh man, I celebrate their collection. Oh boy.

Stephanie Goss:
How's it going?

Andrew Roark:
Oh man, it's good. It's good. It's raining here and so I've got a rowdy doodle that-

Stephanie Goss:
Wants to go out.

Andrew Roark:
That's determined to just make havoc because he can't go out.

Stephanie Goss:
Yes.

Andrew Roark:
So yeah, he woke up-

Stephanie Goss:
Shockingly it is also raining in Washington.

Andrew Roark:
Oh wow. Yeah. Oh, well, works out sometimes.

Stephanie Goss:
Because it's always raining here.

Andrew Roark:
Yeah, no. It's been beautiful.

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah.

Andrew Roark:
We're getting into the summertime in South Carolina at this point when it's coming out and boy, it's beautiful here, but it's nice to get a little bit of rain.

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah. Well, I am excited. I picked this one out of the mail bag. You guys have been doing a great job of sending in questions because there's quite the little queue built up in there, but I was having some conversation… Our Uncharted April event, when we're recording this, you and I just finished that last week and we're having some conversation about this topic and when I saw this mailbag question, I was like, “Ooh, let's do that one,” because I'm still super, super excited about it. So we got an email from someone who is currently an associate vet, but who is wanting to become a practice owner. And so they had quite a toxic environment that they were working in and quit their practice and the resulting interactions between themselves and the practice owner as they were exiting that practice left them thinking ahead to what they don't want to do one day when they're a practice owner.
And so their specific questions have to do with employment contracts and non-competes. So they were saying, “I find non-competes to be a little bit outdated, especially since I live in a pretty dense urban area. The non-solicitation piece I totally get, but who am I to begrudge an employee if they can find a better opportunity elsewhere? And with clients, there are so many of them that I really feel like, in an urban setting, “Does this really matter?”” And they were asking, “When I'm thinking ahead as a practice owner, am I crazy for thinking about disregarding non-competes from my contracts? What are your guys' takes on non-competes?” And I just was like, “Oh yeah, let's talk about this one.”

Andrew Roark:
Yeah, I think this is good. I think non-competes are an area where there are some significant changes that are taking place.

Stephanie Goss:
Yes.

Andrew Roark:
It is a big deal. I was talking to my friend, Dr. Lance Roasa, who's a veterinarian and also a lawyer, and he helps veterinarians with contracts. He's an awesome guy. I've interviewed him a couple times on the Cone of Shame podcast and this was something that he really teed off on as far as a hot area where change is really happening. So I think that that's really cool. So I'm happy to talk about this and where I think it's going and where it seems to be going. And then also I think we could talk in a little bit broader context about contracts in general. I think that that's a fun conversation.

Stephanie Goss:
Sure. Okay. I'm up for it. Like I said, we were having some soapboxy kind of conversation about this last week, so I'm excited. I'm here for it.

Andrew Roark:
Yeah. So before we start talking about non-competes, we need to talk about what the importance of the contract is. And I think a lot of people hand wave over this and they say, “Well, you get a contract. That's just what you do.” And I think there's a couple things about contracts that people maybe don't really think about or don't really understand. And so I will share with you through a school of hard knocks a couple things I have learned about contracts. I am a big believer in the idea that a contract is probably only worth the reputation of the two people who sign it. I really am. I think a lot of people, because they want to believe they have control in this world, believe that they're going to get a contract and that is what will be, and what is written in that contract is chiseled in stone.
And I can tell you, having navigated more of the legal system than I ever wanted to, that's not true. And I wish that it was, but it's not. You say, “Well, this is written down. How could that not be held accountable?” The two things that I would say to people is some people just flat out lie. You could say, “Well, they didn't do this.” And they'd say, “Yes, I did.” And you're like, “No, you didn't.” And unless you can prove that they did not do something, they can say that they did. And it is wildly frustrating, but there's nothing you can do about it. And I think that happens a lot. And they can also make up things and say that you did them. Unless you can prove that you didn't do the made up things that they said, they can muddy the waters.
Oh boy, that's a story for another day. But anyway, it is just a truth about our legal system is I always naively just kind of assume that people would be honest and what was written down would be enforced. And I can tell you, having played the game for a little bit, it ain't that way. The other thing is that enforcing contracts is really expensive. I mean, it is really expensive. Because you're hiring a lawyer at hundreds of dollars an hour to wade into trying to enforce this contract. And if you are going up against, especially a big company, one of my friends, as he put it, was, “Andy, you're fighting a grizzly bear with a pocket knife and it's not going to end well.”

Stephanie Goss:
That's a good analogy.

Andrew Roark:
It's a good analogy. You go, “Oh, I'm going to go up against the legal department of this massive corporation with my buddy Earl, the local attorney. This is going to go well.” Nope, nope. So anyway, those are hard lessons about contracts that I have learned, and I should have given a trigger warning before I laid that down because some people just really don't want to hear that, I'll just tell you that. That's the American legal system in a lot of ways. And I can't speak to the Canadian legal system, but that's it. I will also say, just as we talk about contracts, that suing people is a terrible, horrible experience that you really, really, really want to avoid. You want to avoid suing people as much as you want to avoid being sued. The whole thing is awful. And so when you start thinking about contracts, start thinking about, “What does this really mean and what is really going to be enforceable? And what am I actually going to do if this person violates these things? What are we going to actually do?”
And I'll save you a lot of turmoil that I went through over the years but the ultimate outcome is it's all relationships. It's all relationships and clear expectations. And so I'm not saying I don't use contracts, of course I do, but I think have a pretty healthy view of them, which is, I really don't want to use this. I think the big things that I want here are clear expectations about what I expect and what you can expect from me, and that is the most valuable part of the contract. And then just a focus on a relationship, which means I want to be a good, trustworthy, honest person and I want you to be a good, trustworthy, honest person. And we're going to communicate as we go along as if we didn't have a contract and we just had to work it out on good faith. And that's my best advice on contracts. And so as I start to lay that out and say, “This is what I've learned about contracts,” you can already probably see where I'm starting to go as far as non-competes and things like that.

Stephanie Goss:
Yes. And the other thing that I would add is I think it's funny, I remember really fairly early on in my career as a manager, I remember being asked to sign a contract. And I remember talking about it with my colleagues. And at the time, managers didn't have contracts, it was just doctors and everybody thought I was crazy. But I'll tell you the secret from a headspace perspective, because I think you're spot on, Andy. And for me, maybe I was just young enough and dumb enough and naive enough to not be worried about the legal perspective of it. And what I mean by that is I understood the gravity and I understood, “This is a legally binding document and I'm signing the thing.” I got all of that. And to your point, for me it was about spelling out the plan, spelling out the expectations on both sides.
And I was looking at it from a headspace perspective of, “Am I going to feel good going to sleep at night if I live up to the terms that I'm agreeing to? And on the flip side of that, if the other person in this relationship or persons in this relationship don't live up to their side of the bargain…?” I had a mentor explain it to me, and this was the light bulb moment, they were like, “You should have no qualms about walking away if you've lived up to your side of the bargain and they don't.” That's how I sleep easy at night. And that was really from a headspace perspective was the light bulb for me because it shifted my mindset when it came to the contract into the space that I think you're talking about, Andy, which is, “What's the point? What's the why behind it?”
Well, for me, on a personal level, I'm a big advocate for it, even for our team members, which a lot of managers look at me like I've completely lost my mind when I bring that up. But it's about clear expectations. It's about knowing what I want, what I can expect on both sides, and what my employer, in this case, generally can expect from me as an employee and what I can expect to receive from them.

Andrew Roark:
It should be a two-way document like that. That is the why of the contract for me. Now, additional point I want to add, as you say that, it is amazing to me how many people sign contracts without reading them.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh my gosh, yes.

Andrew Roark:
That's bonkers.

Stephanie Goss:
That's frightening.

Andrew Roark:
And I have seen it so many times and in big companies, I've been like, “You guys signed this thing, you signed this?” And don't be that person. Do not be that person. When you ask Andy Roark for advice and I look at it and go, “You signed this?” It's important, it's important if you're going to sign it… Especially if you're going to sign something that someone else wrote, you better really just read it and know what's in it.

Stephanie Goss:
Yes.

Andrew Roark:
And so that's the other part. The last thing I'll say about contracts, and this is sort of where I came to in my career a while back with contracts. And so this is what I aspire to, and I think that our writer will probably like this. I've talked on the podcast a number of times about Rawls' Veil of Ignorance and Rawls' Veil of Ignorance is this sort of mental exercise where you look at a system and you say, “If I was dropped into a different chair at the table than the one I'm at now, would I be okay with that? Would I feel like the arrangement was fair?” I'm not saying, “Would I be happy necessarily but would I feel like it was fair?” And that's Rawls' Veil of Ignorance. So I run Uncharted and we hire presenters and speakers and I have worked as a presenter and speaker for years and years, like 15 years now I've done this.
And it's interesting to be on the other side of the table because I'm looking at the event part and saying, “Boy, we got to pay the hotel and we got catering, all these things and blah, blah, blah.” And it has always been important to me to put forward a contract that I would think was fair if I was a speaker. That doesn't mean I would take it. I might say, “This is not enough money for me,” or blah blah, blah, blah, but I would feel that it was fair and I would not feel that it was a manipulative contract or it was trying to take more than what I thought was a fair agreement. And so I really tried to work it backwards and forwards to say, “Do I feel good about this as a person writing the contract? Would I feel that this was fair if I was signing the contract?”
And again, this is sort of a philosophical point, but I really think that that's what we should aspire to. I think that's part of being a good, honest, ethical person and a good employer is to say, “I want an agreement that works for me and I believe it's going to work for them and we can talk back and forth about it, but for the most part, I want this to be something that if I was on the other side, I would say, “Okay, I understand why you're asking for what you're asking for.” And we can decide whether it's 14 days of vacation or 10 or 20, but the basic idea being, “Okay, there's a limited amount of vacation and it's clearly stated and I'm on board with that.”

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah, I'm so glad you brought up the point about the fairness and looking at it from through Rawls' Veil of Ignorance, but also the perspective of, “Did you read this because I really can't believe you signed this?” From a headspace perspective, that's really important to me because if you read it and it seems incredulous, you should probably ask. You know what I mean? You should listen to the Spidey senses. And I speak not so much from personal experience, but I've had multiple conversations with young veterinarians and I know, Lance, having worked with as many vets as he has over the years, has heard this time and time again. To your point, people can ask for whatever they want. So as a practice owner, there's nothing to stop me from throwing out a contract that says you have to give me 12 months notice as a veterinarian because maybe in a perfect world, that's what I would want.
On the flip side of that, that's where I would be like from a headspace perspective, “Oh buddy, if you don't read that and you don't look at that and go, “I'm not signing this,” I'm giving you permission, look at that and say, “I'm not signing this,” because that's nuts.” That's where from a headspace perspective, we have to think about it from the perspective of a relationship. And sometimes relationships work great and everything works out really well and sometimes they don't. And so not to assume bad intent because we want to assume good intent, and so when we're framing it on both sides, we should think about it through the lens of good intent. And we should also think about it from the lens of, “This is a relationship and what happens if it doesn't work out? What does that look like?”
And it amazes me how often… And unfortunately this veterinarian who wrote into us found themselves in that predicament where they were trying to get out of their contract and they then went back and read their contract and sure enough, there was a clause in there that bit them in the butt in a big way. And they were like, “Well, never going to do that again,” which is where this came from. And it never ceases to amaze me how often I see that being the case for veterinarians and it makes me really sad.

Andrew Roark:
Well, the notice of leave part is one of the three big bugaboos that I see in contracts with veterinarians, and it's a really wonderful example of that Rawls' Veil Of Ignorance. And I say this because I talk to friends who are practice owners and they say, “Well, if you tell me you're leaving, Associate Vet Andy, it's going to take me four months to get another doctor given the hiring climate right now. And so I need you to give me four to six months notice so that I can find another veterinarian and my business is not damaged and I don't have to worry about having to lay off support staff because we don't have enough doctors,” and blah blah. And they have a very reasonable case from their side of the table on why they would like six months of notice.
And that's why the Rawls' Veil is really good because I said, “All right, clear your mind for a second. Now you come sit on my side of the table and you're an associate vet who's unhappy here or whose spouse is trying to leave. Are you going to stick around for six months after realizing that you need to go? Would you be willing to live apart from your spouse because they got a new job and you have to live alone for six months and pay two rents or a rent and a mortgage? Come on.” That's ridiculous if you put yourself on the other side of the table. And again, I'm not trying to vilify the owners, I understand exactly why they feel the way they do, but part of a good contract is to say, “I see this. Surely the associate vet recognizes, hopefully they recognize, why I need some runway. I need to know a bit ahead of time.”
And I don't know if people understand or not, I mean I hope that they do. So there is a reasonable amount of time to say, “Hey, go find yourself another vet and I want to give you some time and support you while you do that. And at the same time, I need to be free to go on and live my life after I decide that I need to go somewhere else.” And that seems very reasonable as well. So that's a big one. And again, I've seen so many doctors that when they recognize how much notice they're supposed to give is when they decided to leave and they're like, “Oh, 90 days? I'm supposed to do 90 days?” I'm like, “Yeah, that's what you agreed to.” So there's that. The other two areas I always throw out when I say to people, “You didn't read your contract?” The non-competes are a big one.
And I feel like the vet schools have done a good job where there's been a lot of business education in vet schools in a way there did not used to be. So I feel like this is less common, but boy, I remember 10, 12, 15 years ago, there were a lot of doctors who looked around and they were like, “I'm not happy here. I'm going to go work across the street.” And they looked down and it was like, “Oh no, I signed a 30 mile. I am not able to work in this town. My 30 miles runs out in the farmland outside of town, which means basically I have to leave town because it didn't work at this practice.” And I go, “Oh boy, that's a big one.”
The last one is negative accrual, which is again, it was phrased in a way that people didn't really recognize what it meant. And so what happened was the doctors would say, “Oh, I get paid on production, that's great. Let's go.” And what they didn't realize is that if they didn't hit their production numbers, they had to give back the amount… Oh, not really. But the amount that they came up short would be held against them as opposed to resetting and letting them try again next month. And so they would come in as a new graduate into a new system and they wouldn't have cases lined up and they wouldn't come anywhere close to hitting their assigned number.
And then they're so deep in the hole that when they are a good productive veterinarian, they're still buried underneath the deficit they had when they weren't fast and they weren't seeing cases. And again, I also understand from the practice owner's standpoint, when they say, “Well, I'm supposed to pay this person and if they're not generating revenue, then I shouldn't have to pay.” I'm like, “I get it kind of,” but also put yourself in the position of the doctor and you go, “This is not going to fly.”

Stephanie Goss:
It's funny because I can absolutely see both sides on all three of those points. The non-compete, the negative accrual, the leave, I can see arguments on both sides like you laid out. And so for me now where I'm at in my career, I look at it and I think for a lot of practices, particularly I would say that the reasoning behind it is different I think in corporate practice structure often from private practice structure, but ultimately I feel like there's a root of commonality between the two. And that is, “We don't like conflict.” And really for a lot of people, the contract serves to avoid communicating about those hard things. And so the negative accrual often is one of those things. And it's funny because I worked in a practice that paid their doctors solely on production, private practice, and we had negative accrual and I didn't think twice about it for a really, really long time.
And then I had an associate who was on the other side of the table and was asking some really great questions that really made me think about it. And what I realized is that that is a perfect illustration for we choose to have the contracts because we're afraid of the communication that has to come once someone isn't doing the thing that they're supposed to be doing, right? They're not upholding their end of the bargain. And from a headspace perspective, I think it helps get us into the place where we can assume good intent on both sides because if we look at it through the lens of, “Oh, we might be trying to have this document that will help us avoid some of this conflict,” it becomes easier to I think assume that good intent. And what I would say is, as leaders, whether you're a manager, practice owner or director, it's bullshit. You have to communicate.
So now my point of view has changed radically. I don't want to have to have a contract that has a non-compete or has a negative accrual because realistically, I really truly believe I'm not doing my job as a manager if I can't have the hard conversation with an associate, whether they're a new grad or a tenured doctor like yourself who's been practicing for years. If there's a change in your production level over time and you're not producing to pay yourself, that's a conversation that I should be able to have. I shouldn't have to say, “Your contract says this is what you're going to do, so this is the lever that I'm going to pull to get you to do what I want.” I should be able to take accountability for that and I should be able to have that hard conversation.

Andrew Roark:
Well, I love that you say that. It is amazing how many policies and contractual pieces are put into place to avoid having to actually manage people. And there's this fairytale of, “If you set it up the right way, you don't have to manage people.” That's the whole pro-sol mentality for doctors is, “We pay them, they have a base salary and then we pay them on production, and then that way they're going to work hard and they're going to work up cases and I don't have to talk to them about their medical skills and what they're recommending in the rooms because it all takes care of itself. And I guess-“

Stephanie Goss:
“Because if they want to get paid, they're going to do the things that I want them to do.”

Andrew Roark:
Exactly. And you go, “That is not true. You still have to manage those people,” but it's amazing how much that's set up to be that way. One of the things I want to say about contracts, and you propped this into my mind, one of the absolute critical things to remember with contracts is there is no right or wrong here. A lot of people are like, “Okay, Andy, tell me what to ask for my contract and I'll go and get it. So negative accrual, out. Six months of notice, out, blah, blah.” The truth is none of those things are chiseled in stone. My thing is not to say to you, “Don't take a negative accrual contract.” It's not. It's to say, “You need to understand what the deal is and then you need to decide what is right for you and your family.”
I don't think my employer would mind me saying this at the vet clinic, but I work on a straight production at the vet clinic where I work and I love it and I do not expect any sort of a base salary or anything like that because I have great schedule flexibility and I travel and I do lots of other things. And the deal with them was, “Hey, let me come and work and I'll have sort of a flexible schedule, but I want to be here. I want to see cases and then we'll do a production deal and that's all you have to pay me. And that way if I travel, you're not losing any money,” whatever. It works great for us and for where I am in my career. So I would not knock anybody that. If a vet understands what negative accrual is and says, “I understand why you want this, and so I'm going to agree to it,” I'm fine with that. I really am, as long as everybody's eyes' wide open about what the deal is and why it is.
And I'm trying to think of a reason an employer would want that. Maybe the vet is pushing for a really high base salary and the employer's like, “I don't know that you can make this.” And so they say, “Well, we'll do a negative accrual then.” Maybe that's a compromise that works. And so if so, I don't want people to say, “Oh, she said the words negative accrual and Andy says that's horrible.” It's not. That's not how life works. It really is about your specific relationship and what you get. And so the last part I want to put forward sort of in headspace on contracts is this. And so I want you to hear this because this is really important. If you go into a contract trying to get ahead, you are limiting probably the outcome that you can achieve.
It's like the prisoner's dilemma. So the prisoner's dilemma is this psychology game where we set it up and the game can be a little bit complex, but basically the idea with the prisoner's dilemma is you have two players in this game and the best outcome for you in the short term is to try to screw over the other person. And if you screw over the other person, then you will get the better outcome. However, if both people try to screw each other over, you get the worst outcome. And so in the short term, the best thing is for you to screw the other person over and then not to screw you over. If you play the game multiple times in an ongoing way, you very quickly realize that the best possible outcome is collaboration. Don't screw them over and they don't screw you over and we get the second-best outcome again and again and again and again and again and again. Otherwise, you'll screw them one time and then they'll try to screw you and then you both end up screwing each other and you get the worst outcome again and again and again.
And I see contracts like that. So I hope that's not too far of a stretch, but basically the idea is if you go into it going, “Aha, I'm going to stick this associate vet I'm hiring,” or you're the associate vet and you're like, “I'm going to ask for this ridiculous thing and force it…” Like, “I'm going to ask for a salary that's way beyond what I can actually earn or justify and I'm going to use hardball tactics, I'm going to get it,” you might get it, but you're going to have a short tenure at that practice and it's not going to be fun and you're going to feel less than and you're going to have to sit to a lot of conversations about how you're not producing what your salary warrants and then ultimately you're going to leave and that's going to be how it's going to go.
And you're probably not going to be super popular when you go. And I say that to both sides. I really believe going into contracts, the best thing is to treat this like a relationship. It really is. “These are my needs, these are your needs. I want you to understand where I'm coming from and why I'm coming from here. I want to understand where you're coming from, what's important to you. Let's make this thing in a way that we both get what we need and then let's continue to communicate on an ongoing basis to make those adjustments.” And that is the strategy I think for having a healthy, happy employment.

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah, I love it. How do you feel about taking a break here?

Andrew Roark:
Yeah, let's take a break.

Stephanie Goss:
Hey, friends, I just wanted to talk for a quick second about the maths with you all because I've been thinking a lot about the workshops and normally here's where we tell you what's coming up and we've got some great stuff happening so you're going to want to head to unchartedvet.com/events and check out the upcoming calendar but I want to talk about maths because if you are not already an Uncharted member, you can attend any one of our workshops and pay $99 a piece. Most of them are just $99. You can do it as a one-off, great and fine. However, that adds up really quick. And if you do the monthly workshop with us, and I've seen some of you there as repeat customers, which is amazing, but you could spend almost $1,200 over the course of the year doing workshops with us, or you could pay $699 and get a 12-month membership, which means you get all of the workshops that we do at no extra charge.
You also get access to our amazing conversation in the community, our community members, and all of our community resources. And it is hopping over there. We've got conversation 24/7, we have got activities, we've got book club. We're writing our handbooks together in Handbook Helper Group. This year we are talking about development and leadership growth, doing our development pathway this year. We are doing hallway conversations where we're talking about topics. These are sessions that are community led, community driven. It is topics about things that are going on in your practice that you want to talk about with your peers. All of that is happening and it's all included for your $699 membership. So simple m, do you pay almost $1200 for the year or do you pay $699?
If you're not currently a member, you should head over to the website and use this argument to convince your boss. “Hey, boss, I need to be a part of this amazing community because Stephanie told me and because she's telling you that you will save money.” Hopefully that works, but I couldn't resist. I hope to see you at our upcoming workshops. Again unchartedvet.com/events for everything that's coming. And now back to the podcast.

Andrew Roark:
All right, so let's get into the actual question that we were asked.

Stephanie Goss:
Okay.

Andrew Roark:
Which is basically, “I'm thinking about not having a non-compete. I am sensing that there may be a falling out of favor. Am I about to make a really terrible decision decision?”

Stephanie Goss:
Sure.

Andrew Roark:
Exactly. All right, cool. The way I like to look at this is let's look at the non-compete real fast and let's just look at the pros and the cons. So we'll start with that. I think that people in the last… Before we took a break, I said, “We need to be really honest about what do we want and need.” And if you're like, “Hey, negative accrual works for me and I understand why you want it,” then you can do that. I think non-competes can be that way too. The question for me has to be, “Why do you, practice, want me to sign this non-compete? What do you care about?”
And if they say, “Well, I don't want you to work for anybody else in town,” I would say, “Hey, you're going to need to go jump in the lake.” That's ridiculous because I would say, “I'm not interested in signing a contract that's going to make it so that I have to move away if this doesn't work out.” I'm not interested in signing that. If you're thinking about adding a non-compete, what do you care about? And I think most people when they stop and, again Rawls' Veil Of Ignorance, and they put themselves in the position of their doctor, they go, “Okay, my real fear is that they're going to go literally set up a practice across the street,” or, “They're going to get this clientele and they're going to go to our main competitor who we have a Hatfield-McCoy's feud with, and they're going to take our clients and go work there.”
And so that's why people put it forward. The other reason that a lot of businesses put it forward, just to be clear and candid about what's out there, if you're running a practice like you might sell your practice, a lot of the big buyers of practices really like non-competes. They want to have the doctors locked in there in a way that makes it hard for the doctors to leave if the sale goes through. And so what their worry is that the practice gets bought and the doctors all just flee, and now they've bought this practice, they don't have any doctors in it, and so they really like non-competes. And so there is some stability that comes from that, and there's a lot of places that want that. And so just talking about why it happens, I think there are the big reasons. Are there other reasons that you have, Stephanie?

Stephanie Goss:
I could see both of those for sure. The other way I guess that I've seen the non-compete use that makes some valid sense to me is the opening your own practice within a certain radius of the existing practice, because that feels radically different from the seat of the business owner. My associate not being a fit for my practice or being unhappy and going to work at another practice across town feels very different than my associate being mentored by me and my team and then going and opening their own practice right across the street. Those two things feel very different. And so I could totally see something in there from that perspective. But again, when you use Rawls' Veil, is it enough to justify having it in the contract? I don't know.

Andrew Roark:
Yeah, I don't know. Yeah, exactly. A lot of it was-

Stephanie Goss:
But I get wanting to ask for that.

Andrew Roark:
Of course.

Stephanie Goss:
For sure.

Andrew Roark:
And a lot of it is following suit forever. If you were an employer, you put a non-compete in, that's what you did. And so there was great pressure of, “This is how it's done and this is how it works.” So anyway, those are the reasons that I could come up with. “I don't want you to go work for a mega competitor,” “I don't want you to go and start up your own place and take half of our clients away from us. And again, can you accomplish some of that, “Don't take half of our clients away,” with non-solicitation agreements? I think you can to some degree. I really do. And then if you plan to sell the business, a buyer likes to know that doctors are locked in there. It gives them some security. So I get why that happens. What's funny is I start talking about training up a doctor and introducing them to your clients and they grow this clientele and then they leave and they work somewhere else.
You and I did a podcast back in April. It was the April 26th Uncharted. And it was about the technician that got trained and licensed and then left the practice after the practice had paid for licensing. And boy, this feels really similar. It really is that. “I'm investing into this person and putting all of this time and energy into them. And then what if they leave?” And you go, “Okay, I get it.” I think it hits very much on that same scarcity mentality of investing and then having someone go away and we don't like that. So anyway, I'll put this forward as reasons you would have a non-compete. I think the reasons that not have a non-compete, some of it would be, if you do the Rawls' Veil Of Ignorance and say, “I think most of us, we recognize that sometimes things don't work out.”
Someone comes and they work and then it doesn't work and they leave. And I would not feel good with saying to someone, “You have to leave town. You can't work in this town, so sit on your hands for two years.” I think morally I would sort of struggle with that. It doesn't feel like an equitable thing to do. So that's a big part of it. The other thing is that the winds are changing. The law is changing. In human medicine and in the legal profession, non-competes are now done. They're not allowed. And the rationale that was put forward to break that and make those things illegal is we should not have a system where doctors have a relationship with patients and then that patient-doctor relationship gets broken because the doctor has to leave because of a non-compete. We should keep that patient doctor relationship intact. The legal counsel-client relationship, same thing. That should not get broken if that person goes to work on their own or something else.
And so in order to protect those relationships, the non-competes have been struck down. I fully expect that veterinary medicine will probably fall into that same category for those same reasons. And we're already seeing that in a number of different states. There's a lot of pushback on this, right?

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah, it's been interesting to see the transition here in Washington, because they're not enforceable. And so it's been interesting to see the transition, especially working in corporate medicine. And there's often the perception of, “Well, every corporate contract has a non-compete,” and it's not true.

Andrew Roark:
Yes, I think that's important.

Stephanie Goss:
Like you said, we're already seeing it and I would expect that we continue to see it more and more and more. And from this, looking at the pros of why would you not have a non-compete, I think it's a lot healthier in so many ways. And I love the point about human medicine and legal profession because I think there's legitimacy to that. If you have a client or a patient that's particularly bonded to one of your veterinarians and that veterinarian is deeply unhappy or there's circumstances that make them want to leave their practice or they want to open their own practice or whatever it is, mentally, ethically, I guess my personal take is, “Do I really want to get in the way of that?” Leaning into your point about human medicine, if they have a relationship, go with them and I think it goes back to what you said about the scarcity mentality.
I think so many of us are afraid of losing clients, and we think about the one client, but we don't just think about the one client. We can't stop ourselves at the one client. We go from the one client to living in the forest in a cardboard box. We can't. It's just human nature. We can't stop ourselves from catastrophizing that. And so on the practice owner, the practice leader side of it, we go from that, “Well, maybe a few clients or their really loyal clients will follow them.” Well, that should be good. It should be good that they worked in my practice and they built a loyal client base who wants to stay with them because I should look at it from the perspective of, “I shouldn't be in a place where that change should make or break my business.” And I think that scarcity mentality is something that is really hard for a lot of us, myself included. It took me a really long time to get to this place. It's really hard for us to wrap our brains around because it's scary.

Andrew Roark:
Yeah, I agree with that. There's just a couple things that are just sort of absurd in non-competes that I see that people haven't really questioned for a while. Some of it was the distance in the non-competes. Like, look, if somebody's willing to drive 10 miles to see a veterinarian, for God's sakes, let them drive that far. I mean, at that point, you're getting into a relationship that that person really cares a lot about, right? And I have seen that. I've seen people put these huge non-competes out there and you go, “This is ridiculous. No one's going to take your clients at scale at anything beyond a couple of miles.” And then the other part is, and this has always kind of baffled my mind, so here's the thing, you're a veterinarian and you're going in to take a job and you're like, “I've never worked here before and I don't know anybody.”
And they're like, “Here's a one-year contract, sign this non-compete.” And you're like, “How fast do you think I'm going to meet people?” And I get that the idea is introducing it early on but here's the thing too, there's a very good chance that I'm going to come here for one year, it's not going to be a great fit, and that I'm going to leave. We don't like to believe it… I think a huge percentage of relationship, especially with brand new veterinarians, that first year in practice, they're going to leave after a year. Why in the world are you making it so they can't stay in town? It doesn't make any sense. Now, I understand when people are like, “Oh, this person's been here 10 years and they have this huge clientele,” and blah, blah, blah. That feels different. I think there's different reasons there to say, “Well, this person at this point has kind of earned these relationships,” and so on and so forth.
But anyway, that was a thing as a… I remember being a brand new graduate or even not a brand new graduate, but as someone who would move to an area and they're like, “Here's the contract. Also if this doesn't work out, you can't work anywhere near here for two years.” And I'm like, “That's ridiculous. If we get six months into this and it's not working, I shouldn't be blown up for two years. That's not right.” So anyway, I've seen a lot of that stuff.

Stephanie Goss:
And I think on the flip side for a second, you just brought up a really, really good point. So I think there's validity for not having a non-compete. From the perspective of the associate, to your point, if it doesn't work out for me, I should not be restricted for two years from moving on. That is total BS. And this is where it's about, “We don't want to communicate,” coming into play. On the flip side, as a practice owner or practice manager, why, for the love of all that is holy, why would I want to trap an employee into a contract with me where if they are miserable, they might stay just to live out their crappy contract that I gave them in the first place because they're afraid of getting sued? I don't want them to be in my practice making my life and everybody else in the practice's lives miserable for two years because they're afraid of that.
Why would I do that to myself? And yet I see it time in time again from practice owners because they're thinking about leveraging it in the positive to protect themselves. But realistically, it, also to your point, opens you up just as often to that from the negative side because it is a relationship and sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. And we have to think about that because we are also trapping ourselves when we use the non-compete in that regard, especially when it comes to those leave notices or the, “Don't go to another practice within a such and such certain distance.”

Andrew Roark:
It can feel punitive rather than strategic meaning, “Oh, you want to leave? I am going to shut you down. I am going to punish you. I'm going to give you a two-year headache because you left.” And that's not a good place to build a reputation. The last part, when you factor this in, is there are more and more practice groups that are advertising no non-competes. They are like, “We don't believe in non-competes and we are not doing it.” And you can take them at their word and go, “Wow, some people are really great.” Or you can be more cynical and say, “Ooh, that's a hiring advantage. They've figured out that they're probably not going to be able to keep using these anyway. And so they're casting them down and trying to use that as a strategic advantage in hiring.”
But that said, I think more and more doctors are going to hear about places that don't need non-competes or require non-competes. And so I don't know how widespread that's going to be, but I do think it's probably going to happen. And so anyway, all that around, so takeaways from me and then you can decide if you want to jump in on this, these working relationships are relationships. Everybody should be open about what they're offering and what they need. And the plan should be that the contract is part of the ongoing conversation of us working together, and they should put that down. I think non-competes are falling out of favor across the country. I don't know if that will be a complete sweeping change in the next 10 years or if that will be spotty, but they are starting to fall out of favor.
I think your options as an employer are either to say, “We are not going to use them and we're going to focus instead on just trying to maintain good relationships. And we understand that there's some risk, just like we understand there's a risk of us training our staff and then having them leave to go work somewhere else. It's just a risk that we incur.” I think that's probably the healthiest way to go. The other alternative would be to say, “Hey, I have these very specific concerns and this is kind of what I need to feel safe.” And I would say you should dig into what those specific concerns are and communicate upfront.
I mean, there is a way to say, “We're going to have non-compete. It does not kick in until you've worked here for three years. And at that point, if you're here for three years, then it's going to be a fairly limited range, and it's for these really important reasons.” I think you can talk about that just like we talked about the other parts of the contract and say, “If you have a good why and you're willing to make concessions to get the other person to agree to that, and you can articulate what your needs are, if you're okay with it and the vet's okay with it and everybody feels good, then go with it.”

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah. Yeah. I love it. And the only other thing that I would add to your point about it's a relationship and the contract helps define that relationship is on both sides. Especially knowing that this ask came to us from a potential practice owner, I'm going to throw out there, “Don't forget that needs change and they change on both sides.” And so the other piece of this that often doesn't get talked about, but I think that goes along with the ideas of non-competes and negative accrual and stuff like that, that is the winds of favor are shifting, is the perpetual contracts where it's like, “I don't review your contract again until you bring it up.” And as a manager, oh man, so much anxiety, especially early on in my career when one of my associate doctors would be like, “I would like to discuss my contract,” because it felt very negative.
It felt like, “Oh gosh, they're going to ask for some big change and it's going to be the end of the world.” The reality is we're humans in a relationship on both sides, and my needs change as an associate in the practice and my needs as a practice owner change, and we should have a system and a structure. Again, it goes back to the contract can't be the thing that you hide behind because you're afraid of the hard conversations. It has to be set up so that both people in the relationship have the ability to communicate their needs and make it work for them together. And to your point, Andy, sometimes we are in different corners. How do we bridge that gap to come together?
And so I think that's the other piece as a practice owner is if you're doing that to your team, if you're just like, “We're going to do your contract and then we're not going to review it again until you bring it up,” that would definitely be something that I would suggest. Take the stress and anxiety out of it and make a system for it so everybody knows, that it's communicated upfront like, “This is what we're going to do, this is how we're going to do it, this is when we're going to do it.” Put it on the calendar and then actually follow through.

Andrew Roark:
No, I agree.

Stephanie Goss:
Cool, cool.

Andrew Roark:
Well, I mean that's what I got. It's not the firm, “This is how you do it,” answer, but hopefully it's a good way of thinking about contracts in general. Start with the end in mind. What do we want to accomplish? Then going into the relationship, talking about needs that I have, needs the other side has, and then trying to come up with something that works for everybody. Know that non-competes seem to be losing favor. Know that there's other companies that are going without them and using that as a recruiting tool. Just adjust and react appropriately.

Stephanie Goss:
This is so fun. Take care, everybody. Have a fantastic week.

Andrew Roark:
Thanks, everybody. Take care.

Stephanie Goss:
Well, gang, that's a wrap on another episode of the podcast, and as always, this was so fun to dive into the mailbag and answer this question, and I would really love to see more things like this come through the mailbag. If there is something that you would love to have us talk about on the podcast or a question that you are hoping that we might be able to help with, feel free to reach out and send us a message. You can always find the mailbag at the website. The address is unchartedvet.com/mailbag, or you can email us at podcast@unchartedvet.com. Take care, everybody, and have a great week. We'll see you again next time.

Written by Dustin Bays · Categorized: Blog, Podcast · Tagged: culture, doctor, hiring, management, Practice ownership

May 31 2023

When Non-Veterinarians Disagree with Veterinarians on Medicine

This week on the podcast…

This week on the Uncharted Podcast, Dr. Andy Roark and practice management geek Stephanie Goss are in the mailbag to take on a question from a practice owner. One of their managers is disagreeing with one of the associate veterinarians and there are some hurt feelings and upset on both sides. There also happen to be good points from both the manager and the doctor involved in this instance and this practice owner needs some help keeping the peace! Let's get into this…

Uncharted Veterinary Podcast · UVP – 234 – When Non – Veterinarians Disagree With Veterinarians On Medicine

You can also listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music or wherever you get your podcasts.

Do you have something that you would love Andy and Stephanie to role-play on the podcast – a situation where you would love some examples of what someone else would say and how they would say it? If so, send us a message through the mailbag!

We want to hear about your challenges and would love to feature your scenario on the podcast.

Submit it here: unchartedvet.com/mailbag


Upcoming Events

Upcoming events: unchartedvet.com/upcoming-events/


Episode Transcript

Stephanie Goss:
Hey everybody, I am Stephanie Goss, and this is another episode of the Uncharted Podcast. This week on the podcast, we are tackling an issue that Andy and I had a really good time talking through. We have a friend who is a practice owner and they are struggling with their practice manager, having some disagreements with some of the doctors over some of the decisions that they're making on the floor.
There are good points on both sides of this situation and argument, and this practice owner needs help figuring out how to keep the peace. This was a fun one. Let's get into it.

Meg:
And now the Uncharted podcast.

Andy Roark:
Hey, and we are back. It's me, Dr. Andy Roark and the one and only Stephanie. Before you accuse me, take a look at yourself, Goss. Oh man.

Stephanie Goss:
How's it going, Andy Roark?

Andy Roark:
Oh, it's good. It's good. I took my daughter to a 5K fun run on Saturday, and our friend Tyler Grogan, had signed us up to go. And so I was like, “Okay, Tyler's going and some of the other people in the Uncharted team are going. And I was like, I'm, I'm going to go as well.” And I was going to take Hannah, who's my 11-year-old, and it would be sort of her first cross country. She's never ran more than maybe two miles I think, something like that.
So my expectation was we were going to get there and we were just going to kind of run-walk, and it was about being together. So we would do that. And so we go to this 5K, and it's put on by the local animal shelter. And so there are dogs everywhere because they were like, “Bring your dogs.” And I'm like, “I like dogs, I love dogs, I love dogs, I love pet owners.”

Stephanie Goss:
This will be fun.

Andy Roark:
This will be great. And then I got there. And I was like, “This a terrible idea.” It's a terrible idea to bring together literally hundreds of people with the objective of running 3.2 miles and then be like, ‘Bring your dogs.'” And so there we are. And they're like, “Thank God they didn't have a starting line.” But a couple things came into my mind.
Every time I go to a place where there's people and dogs, I am reminded of how pet owners tell themselves stories about their dogs and just hold onto those stories despite all evidence.

Stephanie Goss:
Sure.

Andy Roark:
There was the dog having a full on panic attack, and people were like, “Look at him. He loves coming to things like this.” And I'm like, “That dog, his eyes, bulging out of head just trembling full body shakes, nails dug into the ground.” And they're like, “He's such a social dog.”
And I'm like, “He's too scared to move. What are you doing?” Before they started, they were like, “If you plan to run fast, come to this end of the group.” And all these people just moved down there with their chihuahuas on leashes. And I'm like, “What? This lady with an English bulldog?” And I'm just like, again, the stories that they tell themselves about their pets is amazing to me. So anyway, so they all do it and finally they're like, “They don't have a starting gun, thank God.” But they're like, ‘Ready, set, go.'” And hundreds of people take off running at the same time. And as you can imagine, it's pandemonium. And there's this woman with this big pit bull running up out of ahead of me and Hannah. And the pit bull is morbidly obese. It's a BCS 11 of nine, and then it runs about a hundred yards.
And then stop. It's like, I'm done and just sits down and the lady runs right into it. She goes down.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh no.

Andy Roark:
And the people behind her go down and then all the dogs around them are like, what are you guys doing? And they come pulling over and now these leashes are pulled out like trip wires.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh no.

Andy Roark:
And there's like retractable leashes everywhere. It's everything that's completely horrible that you can ima … It all happened. And I was like, “Hannah, we're going over.” And we lept over. Did not stop to help. Just so you know, I'm kind of like lady, you know thy self, know thy dog. And you didn't. And so I get it. She was in the middle of hundreds of other people. And again, it's a race. I told myself that stopping would have caused more problems.

Stephanie Goss:
So you were also telling yourself stories in your head.

Andy Roark:
Exactly right. Survival stories, Stephanie Goss. Stories about-

Stephanie Goss:
Someone else is going to help that woman. It's fine.

Andy Roark:
She was shielded by the dog, really it was like-

Stephanie Goss:
I'm sure there's another vet in the crowd who could have made sure the dog was okay.

Andy Roark:
I'm sorry. She didn't need a vet. And the pit bull was fine because she was big and he just laid down. And no one's stepping on that dog, I'll tell you that. That lady is to fend for herself. But that dog was fine.
We got like two miles into the run, and there's this lady sitting on a bench and she's holding this Chihuahua and he's 100% asleep just like nose under her chin, you know what I mean? She's holding him like a baby and his legs are up in the air and we go jogging by, and my daughter and I look at her and she looks at us and she goes, “He's done.” And I'm like, okay, I love it. But she says, “He's done.” That's what I wanted to be. We're two miles into that. I was like, I would like to lay down and just be done, but everyone …
So anyway, it was, again, I loved it. Wonderful time with my daughter. I still love pet owners, I still love pets. I'm just not a hundred percent bought into hundreds of pet owners and pets together doing a thing at the same time.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh, that's fantastic. But it's for charity.

Andy Roark:
Yeah.

Stephanie Goss:
That's a real good cause.

Andy Roark:
Felt very good about supporting. I felt very good about supporting. And it really was fun. And so that was that.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh gosh, Tyler's take on the event was radically different than yours.

Andy Roark:
Oh, well, see, she just walked.

Stephanie Goss:
I don't know that there was ever running in the idea, although I could see Tyler being a runner, but it was like, we'll do this fun thing together as a team and we'll talk and just meet, make our way through and it'll be bonding.

Andy Roark:
I showed up with my itty bitty booty shorts.

Stephanie Goss:
I'm taking off.

Andy Roark:
Yeah, I showed up tan lines-

Stephanie Goss:
“Let's get this done.”

Andy Roark:
Out there so that everybody could say like, “Little tiny runny shorts.” I was doing the quad stretch where I'm holding my ankle and other ankle, and Tyler's like … She was wearing yoga pants and a sweatshirt.

Stephanie Goss:
And I saw the picture, and Steph's got her coffee in her hand and I'm like, “There was never the intention.”

Andy Roark:
I was like, “Are you guys going to put your coffees down before the race starts?” And they just both just looked at me like I was so dumb.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh, it's fantastic.

Andy Roark:
We're wired a little bit differently, Tyler and I.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh man. Well, glad to know that we haven't even started this episode, and we're off the rails.

Andy Roark:
Oh yeah. Well, you asked how I was doing. That's how I'm doing. How are you doing?

Stephanie Goss:
Fair. I am excited about this episode because when I read this episode I was like, “Did I write this in our ideas database and forget that I wrote it?” Because it is a hundred percent a situation that I had in my practice, and it came from someone else. But I think this is going to be one of those episodes that people are like, “Hmm, I think they might be talking about my practice.” So it came to us from a practice owner who was struggling because they have someone on their leadership team who is fighting with some of the doctors.
And so they unpacked what fighting means and it was a really good unpacking, but they kind of framed it with like, “Help. I need help figuring out how to keep the peace on my team.” So there are some disagreements when it comes to the quality of medicine that is being practiced.
And so this practice owner was like, “Look, I set the standards for my practice and I trained my manager to uphold the standards that I decided on.” Fair. And now the practice has grown and there's multiple doctors on the team, so it's grown from a small practice to a bigger practice. And so they were like when an associate doctor wants to do something differently than our standard, this member of the leadership team and one of the managers has somewhat of a spicy approach to disagreeing with the other doctors.
And this practice owner was like, “Look, I get it because on one hand, I appreciate and want them to do their job and I want them to enforce our standards of care. I want them to enforce the protocols. That's what I've asked them to do. And on the other hand, they didn't go to vet school, the doctors went to vet school and the doctors are making decisions in real-time, and I need to figure out a way to make this not be a spicy conflict when it arises and figure out how to manage the situation when a non-DVM leader in the practice disagrees with one or more of the doctors on the medicine side.”
And they were like, “It's a really fine line. I have no idea where to start. Please help.” And I just thought that this one was a fantastic one. It's one that we haven't talked about before. And like I said, my mind immediately went to the treatment room into this situation that happened in my practice, and I was just like, “I could have written this.” So I'm excited to talk about this one.

Andy Roark:
I like this one a lot. This is one of those fun balancing different people type problems that I really enjoy. So yeah, this is good. All right, cool.
Well, let's start with some head space just to get into this a little bit. The first thing I'm going to say in head space is this is a classic example of what we're fighting about is not what we're fighting about. Absolutely, there is so much baggage here. The first challenge here is to get everyone to understand what we're actually talking about because otherwise they will not. And so we've talked a lot about this.
I tell a story sometimes about forgetting to get a babysitter when I had told my wife I was going to take her out on a date, and my oldest daughter was like 11 and my youngest daughter was eight. And she was like … The night came and we were getting ready to go in an hour or two, and she was like, “Who's the babysitter?” And I was like, “We don't need a babysitter.” And she was like, “Yeah, we do.” And I was like, “No, we don't. Jacqueline is old enough to watch her and Hannah and we can go.”
And Allison was like, “No, she's not.” And I was like, “Pretty sure she is, and I'll Google it and see what I'll see the legal.”

Stephanie Goss:
Shut up.

Andy Roark:
Ah well, there's legality here. There's a legal precedent. And I am going to investigate it and see what it is. And so I googled it. And 11 years old in the state of South Carolina is the answer. And so clearly I won the argument and then we both just agreed that I was right and we went on a lovely date. That's not what happened. We did not finish the argument the way that I had hoped. It escalated, if anything.
Ultimately, this is an example of the fight is not about the fight. The fight was not about how old the children need to be in order to be left alone. The fight was about Andy didn't get a babysitter even though he said he was going to take his wife on a date and now this is a thing and he really dropped the ball, and he hasn't apologized for dropping the ball– he has made excuses instead. And so that's an argument that's not really about the argument. The same thing is here too. When you go to the doctor and say, “You are not upholding the standard of care.” You are saying a lot of things you are saying you did not take acceptable care of the patient, you possibly don't know what you're doing, you are not worthy of being here based on this result.
People get real defensive about those things really fast. There's a lot of stuff about identity, self-worth, your medical knowledge, your values. Are you doing a good enough job, are you walking your talk, all of those sorts of things. There's an ethical component. You are doing something unethical. You were negligent. “When you say you didn't meet the standard of care,” what I hear is you were negligent in your treatment of the patient. And that's not what the person said, but boy, you better believe all of those things, depending on the individual you're talking to, they come right to the top of mind. And so the first thing we've got to do is know that when you go to the doctor and you confront them this way, if you walk right up to them and say, in this case you did this, you're going to get a lot of strings attached to the response you get back.

Stephanie Goss:
Yes. Well, I mean to your point when you were telling us the story at the beginning of the episode, it's about the stories that we tell ourselves in our head. And I think that's from a head space perspective, I agree with you a hundred percent. It's never the conversation or the argument that's about the thing. It's always something else. And the question is it about something else on both people's parts? On one person's part on? You have to figure all of that out. And so I think from a head space perspective, for me, I think part of it is about where we always start, which is part of the talking about having a safe conversation. And when I think about looking at this, one of the questions that I try and ask myself … putting myself in this practice owner's shoes, one of the things that I would hope that I would do would be to ask my manager, “What else could this be about? What could the vet have – are there things you think that the vet could have been thinking about to help assume good intent?”
Because there are things on both sides. The vets are thinking about other things. They are weighing in things that the manager may or may not know about. And to the practice owner's point, they went to vet school, they have a medical degree that proves them perfectly competent to make those decisions. And there is reasoning there and getting curious about what that reasoning is and why it happened is really I think important to assuming good intent.
And on the flip side, getting curious about why the manager is asking questions is also important because to this practice owner's point, the manager's job is to care about the decisions that the doctor's making because they are supposed to be thinking about things like patient safety and client experience and the impact to the practice and staff retention and staff satisfaction, and all of those things. So they have a vested interest as well. And when you have two parties that are both potentially telling themselves stories in their heads, I think where you have to start is with that assuming good intent and asking yourself part of, am I safe to have this conversation for me in problem-solving this, and I know we're not to actions yet.
But is to ask yourself what else could this mean? Why might they have made this decision ahead of the conversation? It's also one of the action steps that I am going to encourage to the manager to ask in the moment, but teach them a healthy way to do it. But it's important for them to ask themselves that question of, why else could they have made that decision?

Andy Roark:
That is exactly the approach whenever you have these conversations that are not about the conversation, whenever you have these emotionally-loaded things, I would say the little two-pack combo that I would put front and center in head space is exactly what you said, it's assume good intent, first of all. If you go in and say this person failed or you didn't do what you're supposed to do, this thing is already going to go … It's already going to go sideways. It's like right off the bat, this thing is already going to go badly. Just count on it. Assume good intent. Assume the person was acting with noble intentions.
And then the second part is seek first to understand. I'm assuming this person had a good reason for doing what they did. I want to understand what it is so I can understand how it fits into the context of our medical standards. Do we need to make changes to our medical standards? Do we need to make changes to our medical standards or how we talk about them so that in these cases, this is something that it fits into our standards so that … and we can get into it in a second, we're going to start getting into what are the consequences here, what we want to make sure that the team understands what's going on, we want to make sure that the team is able to support you, but they can't support you if they don't understand what's happening.
So all of those are very productive ways to unpack these sorts of things. But I think there's two pieces here. I think number one is when you start to unpack what happened, you better get into a good, healthy, curious, positive head space. And then number two is I would say unpack it and then you need to put all of this aside and you need to talk about what you're going to do in the future. And then you need to have a positive, productive conversation about where are we going in the future. If this turns into the manager arguing with the doctor about a case that happened yesterday, the manager's going to lose, and they should lose because they're not a doctor. They're like, “That's it.” Anyway, I'd say they should lose again, but you get my point. It really does come down to two people, have a clear disagreement about a case, the person who's a professional veterinarian should probably have a stronger leg to stand on.

Stephanie Goss:
Well, and I would say I disagree with that slightly in the sense that I think there have been times where I have had two doctors who disagree on what to do with the case. They're both educated, they both have the veterinary degrees, and they have different opinions or different perspectives. And so I think it's about finding that middle ground to your point about getting curious where you're seeking to understand why are you doing the thing to figure out how are you going to be able to move forward in the future.
It's not about making someone feel right or wrong or you know less than they do because I'll tell you, I've worked with a lot of managers who know a whole lot of things and who will bring about medical concerns that others on the teams may not have brought up. So, I think there's validity there, and it's hard. I get fired up and on my soapbox as a manager who didn't originally come from the medicine side of things when people are like, “Well, you're just a manager, you don't know anything,” and not that's what you said because that's not how I took it at all.

Andy Roark:
No, I didn't want to bring that across. I might need to restate that, but …

Stephanie Goss:
No, that's not how I took it at all. And I think it's important to recognize that we're all telling ourselves some degree of story and filtering it through the lens of our own experience. And so it doesn't matter whether you went to vet school, or didn't go to vet school because you can have two people who even went to the same vet school who have radically different perspectives on how to treat the same case. And so I think it's about that finding that … I'm so glad that you said the seek first to understand because a huge part of that head space is like what are we doing and why are we doing it, are we doing it simply because as the business owner I said we need to have protocols, these are the protocols I set up and you're enforcing them.
Wonderful. I appreciate that so much. I appreciate you doing your job fantastically well. And protocols change. Medicine changes. Medicine is radically different now than it was 20 years ago when I started. We're using different drugs, we're using the same drugs in radically different ways. Things change and things have to be flexible. And so I think getting curious on all three sides of this, because there really are at least three sides here and you brought up a fourth when you talk about the rest of the team, getting curious and asking those questions about, “Why? Tell me more,” is really going to help us get to the heart of how do we tackle this and how do we fix it. And it being future-facing is so important and I'm really glad that you said that.

Andy Roark:
And just to give some color to this because as I say sort of the veterinarian should have the stronger leg to stand on. What I mean, I don't mean, hey, if this person's a vet, then they're right and the other person is wrong and that's all there is to it. I don't buy into that vet worship stuff. And you know that. I think when I say that, I still stand by that as a general rule. And it's a lot of it is because one, yes, there's a difference in medical training, but the bigger part for me is the veterinarian is the one who is in the room. And yes, they're a human being and they're making decisions in the moment on the fly. And I feel like whenever possible, we need to support the person who was in the room making decisions in the moment and who could actually talk to the client and read the situation and see what's going on.
And this is where my point comes from, I'm always a bit wary of someone picking up the medical record two days later and saying, “You clearly did this wrong.” And going in there, I think that that's a recipe for disaster. And so I don't want to overstate that or make it about positions– this person's in the right and this person's not. I just think that when we start to get the benefit of the doubt. I'm a big fan of giving a benefit of doubt to the person who was there, who was looking the pet owner in the eye, who was looking at the pet and who was trying their best and who was working with the information that they had at the moment as opposed to standing back and saying, well, clearly, we have it written down that this is how we do these cases. So that was sort of the point that I was trying to make there.

Stephanie Goss:
Sure, for sure. Well, that feels like armchair quarterbacking, right?

Andy Roark:
Yeah, exactly.

Stephanie Goss:
It's like you're being asked to make a call or make a judgment when you weren't in the middle of things. And so I think there's validity there. And I certainly felt that. And like I said in the beginning, this is … I could have written this and I struggled because to your point, I wasn't in the room but my manager, my leader was– she was the tech on the case with the doctor. And so now I have that situation of two people with medical backgrounds with experience who have radically different takes on how to manage the thing. And now I wasn't in the room, but I'm being asked to make judgment calls on how do we move this forward and holy hell, it's hard. It's so hard.

Andy Roark:
And I have 100% seen those things where a doctor and technician were on the same case and they had very different opinions about how it went. And it's very hard. And if you're the manager who gets brought into that and you weren't there and you didn't see what was happening, boy, it's a nightmare case, it's a hard case. I do want to point out at this point, this is a problem of success in a lot of ways, which means you get problems like this when people care a lot about what they're doing and they care about doing a good job. And so these are not awful problems to have in that they only come around because you have people who are really engaged and who really care. And so I do think that that's a good thing.

Stephanie Goss:
And I think that's one of the most powerful tools for when we get into action steps because leveraging that and acknowledging how much they care on all sides will go a tremendous way towards making this a future-facing conversation and dropping that anxiety level over, “Hey, we've got to talk about the disagreement.”

Andy Roark:
I completely agree. I guess my last part in head space is I would 100% make sure that this conversation is not framed as right and wrong. “That the technician is right and the doctor's wrong or the doctor's right and the manager's wrong.” I would not frame it that way. I don't think that's productive. I think it leads to hurt feelings. There is no arbiter of medical care in the sky who says, “Yes, this was the optimal way to proceed.” That's not even possible. I mean, I'll say I've seen cases where the doctor practiced the pinnacle highest premium standard of care, and the pet owner left and got really angry when they got home because they were like, “I couldn't afford this and you did all of these things and now I'm not coming back because I can't afford you guys anymore and blah blah blah.”
And again, medically speaking, the doctor did the best thing. Yet, there's a client who's angry on the phone saying, how dare you do all of these things when I just wanted my pet taken care of in this basic simple way. And you go, “I don't know what's right.” If you work the case up to the point that the pet owner never comes back again, was that optimal? I doubt it, but I don't know. You know what I mean?
So anyway, that's why … I try to throw those shades of gray in there, not to irritate anybody about what the standard of care should be, but just to say there's not a right answer. There's only guidelines, there's only sort of our values and how we position ourselves. There's only consistency, and consistency is really important. And so when we start to get into action steps, we're going to start to talk about what matters and what's important. But I do think that … I guess we can put this as groundwork, starting to have some agreements in our team about what our values are, about what we care about. Those things are really important for having these conversations. If you don't have sort of team values, core values, things like that that say these are the things we care about, this is a really hard conversation to have. If we can come up with some things that we all agree on about what's important in the way we treat each other about the what's important in the way we treat the pet owners, then we can use those as touchpoints to start to make some standards.
But if we don't have any conversations about what's important to us, what our identity as a team is, then it's really hard for us to make standards because the standards that you are interested in and the standard that I'm interested in, they can be wildly different. And we've seen that. Anybody who's been in vet medicine for very long has seen some practices where they just let the doctors completely run however they want. And you've got one doctor who may or may not be the senior doctor who's like, “No, we're doing it. We're doing old school.” And you've got new doctors who go, “I can't look, I just can't. Look at that.” And I'm not trying to throw anybody under the bus or ageist anything, but just give an example of a common one we see is people who practice medicine very differently.
I've seen old-school doctors who have kept up and done a lot of learning and they are amazing, much better doctors than I am. So it's not anything about anything other like that. I use that as a classic example of doctors doing very different things in the same building. And it happens a lot. And boy is it hard to get them onto the same page, and they can get really defensive really fast.

Stephanie Goss:
For sure. And I think your point is a great one, and when you do have agreements about how you're going to work, what your values are, even like you're going to talk to each other or manage through conflict, which is one of our action steps here coming up. But even if you don't have that, your point about this is a problem of success, they both care. The doctor cares about the patient and is trying to do the best thing for the patient. And this manager or managers or whoever is concerned about it, cares about the patients as well. It's not less or they're caring about … And maybe they are caring about different things, but they both care.
And so starting there and being able to say, Hey, I know we're having this conversation because I know how deeply you both care about your work and I want to use that to figure out how do we come to some agreement on how do we deal with this in the future. Using that works whether you have stuff formalized or not. And it works whether you have … The problem is with all doctors, I had that exact conversation when my doctors all disagreed on how to manage a certain type of case and what kind of drugs we were going to carry. And I was like, “Look, you guys all agree, you're all really smart. I don't have a degree in veterinary medicine. I'm not going to make the call here, but I need us to work together to figure out what is going to be our agreement between us” because the team can't have it four different ways.
And so it's about how do we find that common ground. And so I think that head space of “this is the problem of success” is a really healthy one to help move into those action steps of talking about it.

Andy Roark:
I also think to some degree, it can make the conversation easier when you have multiple points of view because then you can clearly say, “I'm not picking sides.” We need to come together and find a path that has us all doing the same thing. So anyway, I think that's probably where I'd be for head space. So it's just sort of summarize real quick. Remember this is a problem. We're not really talking about the problem. You have to be very careful here about people's emotions, self-worth, self-identity, values, things like that. So just we want to be really, really careful here. The combo to start off with is going to be assume good intent and coach to assume good intent and then seek first to understand is try to understand what's happening, what's going on.
Remember to put your standards of care forward as a living document. Whatever your standard of care is today, that's not going to be your standard of care in 10 years. You're going to continue to evolve and change as we learn things. And so that also makes the standards of care a less scary, chiseled-in stone thing. It's something that we can talk about, and that's okay. Remember the end result that you want to try to get. The end result is important. The end result is not to make the doctor apologize or to take the manager down a peg. If that's what you're trying to do. You are off base. The end result is to come to an understanding so that next time the case comes in, we have some agreement about how we're going to proceed as a team so everybody feels included and safe and onboard, and that's the end result that we're looking for.
And so if you pull the flaming raging sword of justice and you go seeking to figure out who is right and who is out of line, is it the doctor that is wrong and negligent, is it the manager that is overstepping her bounds, none of that's going to end well. In any sort of way, it ain't worth it. Just go in there and talk to everybody and figure out what's happening and what we're going to do next time.
And the last thing I would say is remember just to lay down why are we doing this. And that's going to be my first part in the action steps. “Why is this even important?” And I think a lot of people fall into the idea of, well, this is a test, and there are rules and you broke the rules or you didn't break the rules. And I go, “Who wants to play that game?” That doesn't make any sense. “This person was wrong, and I know the rules and I'm going to show them they were wrong.” I go, “Okay, if that makes you feel better, you can do that, but you should really enjoy it because you're going to have weeks of pain in the neck trying to get past this conversation, and it's fallout.”

Stephanie Goss:
For sure. Okay, well, let's take a break and then come back and talk about where do we go from here, how do we manage this.
Hey friends, I just wanted to talk for a quick second about some maths with y'all because I've been thinking a lot about the workshops and normally, here's where we tell you what's coming up and we've got some great stuff happening. So you're going to want to head to unchartedvet.com/events and check out the upcoming calendar. But I want to talk about maths because if you are not already an Uncharted member, you can attend any one of our workshops and pay $99 a piece. Most of them are just $99. You can do it as a one-off, great and fine. However, that adds up really quick. And if you do the monthly workshop with us, and I've seen some of you there as repeat customers, which is amazing, but you could spend almost $1,200 over the course of the year doing workshops with us. Or you could pay $699 and get a 12-month membership, which means you get all of the workshops that we do at no extra charge.
You also get access to our amazing conversation in the community, our community members, and all of our community resources. And it is hopping over there. We've got conversation 24/7, we have got activities, we've got book club. We're writing our handbooks together in handbook helper group this year. We are talking about development and leadership growth, doing our development pathway this year. We are doing hallway conversations where we're talking about topics. These are sessions that are community-led, community-driven. It is topics about things that are going on in your practice that you want to talk about with your peers. All of that is happening and it's all included for your $699 membership. So simple maths, do you pay almost $1200 for the year or do you pay $699?
If you're not currently a member, you should head over to the website and use this argument to convince your boss: “Hey boss, I need to be a part of this amazing community because Stephanie told me so and because she's telling you that you will save money.” Hopefully that works, but I couldn't resist. I hope to see you at our upcoming workshops again unchartedvet.com/events for everything that's coming. And now back to the podcast.

Andy Roark:
So when we start to manage this action steps, this is just some multipart approach. This is not one where you roll in and swing for the fences. I don't know, maybe other people are better than me. There's no way I walk into this with the idea of we're going to have a meeting and this'll be over. That's a fool's game. That's not going to happen. This is a series of meetings. This is a meeting with the manager and separately, a meeting with the doctors or doctors, and then it's going to be a meeting together. And the reason it's because I'm going to need to get both of these individuals into the right head space to talk to each other. And if I don't do some pre-work to set them up to have this conversation, the whole thing's going straight in the ditch.

Stephanie Goss:
Yes, I would agree with that for sure.

Andy Roark:
So let's talk about the manager. So the manager's the one who's looking at the record and she says, “This is not up to our standard of care. I have a problem with this, I'm upset about it.” Seek first to understand. Same thing here. “What's important to you about the standard of care? You're clearly really in this. Why is this important, I want you to tell me why it's important.” And they'll think to you that you're jerking them around and “I need to understand why does this person care about the standard of care? Is it because they feel like it's important for them to know what's going on as the manager? Is it that they're worried about the perception of the staff of this happening? Is it they're worried about patient care?” I don't know what's important to them about standard of care until I ask them.
And a lot of times, we skip this step. We just start talking about the standard of care as if it is by itself important. The standard of care is just a guideline, but that guideline means things, but it means different things to different people. And it's important for different reasons to different people. And so the first question for me is, what's important about the standard of care? And I need to start to find that out. So do you agree with that as kind of an opening position?

Stephanie Goss:
I love it. Yeah.

Andy Roark:
All right, cool. So I want to talk then, and I want to start to put into the person's mind the idea. So we're talking about the standard care and we're talking about this why the standard care is important. And then what I need to generally do is introduce the idea on standard of care. I need to introduce the idea to this person that standard of care is flexible and it is highly context-dependent.

Stephanie Goss:
Sure.

Andy Roark:
Meaning now it's never okay to be negligent. We know that. However, it's never okay to be negligent, full-stop period. And there are different approaches that we take based on what we see in the exam room and also what the pet is going to allow us to do. We have all sent patients home at the end of the day that should have been hospitalized. They should have gone to the emergency clinic, but they weren't going to the emergency clinic. And we all see that. And so there's plenty of examples about standard of care. It's flexible. And I would sort of say, how do we know what's acceptable, how do we know what makes a good standard of care? And I always try to get vulnerable with people here and say, “You know what, I'm a doctor. I do a podcast for a living where I talk to people about medicine all the time, and I'm constantly learning and I'm constantly updating and things that the inflow of data is absolutely unceasing.”
And then also, spectrum of care data is really blowing up. We're starting to see a lot more coming out about more conservative treatment options and what are the outcomes with this and we didn't have that data before. And so anyway, I'll put forward when we start talking about things like that, the classic one for me was the Colorado State parvo outpatient treatment. And when I was getting trained in everything, hospitalization of parvovirus patients was absolutely critical. That's it, it had to happen. And lo and behold, we end up getting this protocol out of Colorado State that's an outpatient treatment protocol.
And only when we see the numbers do people go, “Oh wow, this is a radically different than what I anticipated the outcomes would be.” And so inpatient parvo treatment gives you about a 90% success rate. And Colorado State's outpatient parvo treatment gives you 80% success rate. So not the same. In hospitalizing inpatient does give you a higher success rate. However, I don't think many of us would say, oh, the outpatient is unacceptable, but we didn't used to know that. That's fairly new. And so anyway, I start to have some conversations about medicine changing and standards changing, and it's all sort of figuring these things out. I'm trying to get this person to recognize that the standard has some wiggle to it, and there's some reasons that we move around it, and it's not a perfect measure. And so what I'm really trying to do is set them up in a position to give the other person grace.

Stephanie Goss:
Well, and I love that. And I think the other thing as a leader, as a business owner, and as a manager that might come out of that conversation is where are the gaps in learning and potential opportunities for learning with the team. And what I mean by that is if you ask the question, how do you know what's acceptable? And the answer is, well, you said that that's what the standard is, so that's what I expect everybody to do. That's an incredible opportunity to teach not only your manager, but also probably other members of your support team about the why. And that is a huge opportunity that is only going to get identified if you ask that question. So I love starting there.

Andy Roark:
Well, and then roll that together with the why is the standard of care important– what's important about it to you? And now you've really got something, and you can see me starting to get the manager rocking just to where they're not going to be so rigid that it's right or wrong, do or die. Depending on the person and where they go, I would start with all of those things and get them to hopefully buy into the idea that this isn't as set in stone as we wish it was. It's just not. And we deserve to at least try to figure out what the other person was looking at and what they were dealing with. And then oftentimes, if I can get them to empathize, and I would love … Again, all of these things are priming this person to have another conversation. And so I want to then try to get them into empathizing a bit with the doctor.
And maybe they don't need to; maybe they're already empathizing but a lot of times just getting someone into that head space makes all the difference in the world. It's like when your kid comes home and they've had an argument at school or somebody was mean to them, and you say to them, “Well, how do you think that person was feeling?” Or “What might have made them act that way?” And it's an example, I'm trying to teach my kid empathy. I'm trying to get them to say, okay, I can understand how that person would've been mad. They shouldn't have hit me, but I also shouldn't have called them Johnny Big Teeth.

Stephanie Goss:
Great.

Andy Roark:
Or whatever. I get it. I said, “But I get it. I understand why that would make him mad.” And again, it is trying to get that. So the same questions I start to have with the manager, and this is not a punitive conversation, it is a hundred percent an empathy conversation, but I'm going to try to get them to think about, Hey, if you were a doctor and the staff was looking up to you and the manager came in and started challenging your medical decisions, how would you feel? What emotions do you think you would feel? And this is just us talking, “Getting ready to go talk to Dr. Smith, but what do you think Dr. Smith's emotions are?” And just get them to hear, “Well, I'd be embarrassed, and I would feel like I'm not being supported.” Totally. Those are all emotions Dr. Smith has. And again, this is me talking somebody else into a healthy head space to go have this conversation.
So, anyway. And then the last part too is I would start to talk about some consequences of what are the downsides of conflict like this that we want to try to mitigate. So for example, if these are things that are happening and the staff is aware of them, I'm worried because here I've got my doctors, and I want to build a workplace that's built on trust. I want my techs to trust my doctors.

Stephanie Goss:
Of course.

Andy Roark:
I want my doctors who trust my techs. I want everybody to trust our team manager, and our manager to trust everybody on the team. And so undermining the doctor credibility and unless we have a really, really, really, really good reason to, is generally a bad idea. And I don't want to undermine the trust that the staff has in this doctor. Definitely not until we get to talk about what happened and where are we, you know what I mean? And again, I can't change what happened yesterday. We can only go forward. And I feel like here at the end, I should go back and put the statement in. I feel like I've tried of made this point, but just to be totally clear, I'm not talking about a doctor being negligent or doing awful things. I'm 100% talking here about a disagreement over standard of care that is well above negligence, but not what our stated standard is for this hospital.

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah. A common example that I can think of is … So, the standard of care for a diabetic patient is we're going to do a full glucose curve and an exam, and you have a set … this is what we're going to do and this is how frequently we're going to do it. And then the patient comes in for the exam. And to your point, the doctor takes in all of the information in the exam room, they take in the info from the owner, and then they make a decision that deviates from that standard of care. Maybe it's doing a mini curve instead of a full curve, or maybe it's sending them home to do a curve at home versus doing it in the hospital.

Andy Roark:
They didn't do an exam because they did an exam three days ago or last week.

Stephanie Goss:
When they were here for an ear infection. And so they were just like, “It's fine.” But it's one of those things that's a deviation that someone is like, “There's a reason why we say that we're going to do it this way.” And that is 100% true. It is also a hundred percent true that the doctor's job is to take all of that information and make decisions with it. And so that's why you're in this middle ground. You are right, and they are right. And now I need to figure out a way for us to work together so that nobody feels like they were wrong here because you're both doing what you're supposed to be doing. And veterinary medicine is about the shades of gray. And there are always going to be times where the doctor says, I'm going to do this instead of this time, or I'm going to make this decision. Or as a manager, I'm going to make this exception for customer service. We live in a world of gray.
And so that's where, to your point, getting them to put their empathy shoes on and imagine, ask themselves a question, what else could this mean, what else could they have been thinking, why else could they have made this decision even if they can't get themselves to have empathy … because I've been in situations where someone has been so fired up and so hacked off that if I ask them, “Could you imagine how they could have been feeling when you called them Johnny Big teeth,” they're going to be like, “Screw you.”

Andy Roark:
That's sticking now. Now that we're using it, that kid's Johnny Big Teeth forever.

Stephanie Goss:
They're like, “No, he couldn't have been feeling anything else except for my fist before I put it in his face.” But there is still a way to get them to feel the empathy. And so if that lever doesn't work, getting them to ask the questions about what else could this be about because we live in a world of gray in veterinary medicine, and there are … That is the job as a manager, that is also the job as a doctor, is to make those game time decisions. And it doesn't matter whether you're a practice owner working with a practice manager, whether you're an associate doctor working with a technician. We have to be able to lead the practice, whether we're leading for our patients in the moment in the exam room, or we're leading the team in front of everybody at a team meeting, we have to be able to lead and do our jobs knowing that we trust each other as a team.
And so we have to come to that place of common ground. And so your job as the middle ground person is to figure out how to get them to find that common ground and acknowledge the fact that you're both doing your jobs. No one is wrong. And we still have to find the shades that talk through the shades of gray hair.

Andy Roark:
Yeah, I completely agree. I just had a recollection of … I got in trouble for this one time of sort of a standard of care thing like this where it was like, I had this little miniature schnauzer and it had a bad corneal ulcer. So one of his eyes, and I don't remember which eye or anything … it was a bad corneal ulcer and that thing was not getting better. And I was wrestling with it and wrestling with it. And I had this, and the lady was this wonderful sweet old lady, but I had her coming in every five to seven days and I was restaining it. And every time she came in, it was our policy at the hospital to charge a recheck exam and to do it. And finally, after four or five times, I said, “All right, well, I'll see you back again.”
And she was like, “Dr. Roark, I think you're so great. Are you going to charge me $100 again today for this?” And I couldn't do it. And I was like, [inaudible 00:50:46]. At this point, I knew exactly what I was looking for. The dog didn't need a full physical exam, I just needed to get that eye stained. And she was wonderful. And she said that to me, and I stopped charging for those exams because I was like, Nope, she's going to come in. I'm going to stain her eye. We're going to see where we're doing, we're going to make adjustments and she's going to go. But she was so wonderful. And again, I understand that some people would be like, no, Andy, you can't do that. You should have charged her a hundred bucks every time. And was it the fact that she was a sweet little old lady? Yeah, that probably had something to do with it. Yeah, it probably did.
And again, but if you sat me down and … And they did. The management said something to me about, Hey, it's not standard of care to do this.

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah, how can you do this.

Andy Roark:
And I kind of said, “I hear that; I'm not going to do it.” And I told them. And again, it was one of those things too where I said, “You guys know me. You know that I take care of my cases, and I work up my cases, and this is rare. But in this case, I feel that this is warranted to be able to continue to give this person the care that they need for their pet.” And again, it was a one-off; it was not a common thing, but again, that was a thing where they said, “No, our standard of care is a recheck examination and a fluorescein stain.” And I was just like, “Come and look at this chart with me. Let's see what we're looking at here.” Anyway.

Stephanie Goss:
Well, you're talking about the why, right? So you have to do that with the manager, but then you also have to have the conversation with the doctor because you got to prime that pump, too.

Andy Roark:
I agree. So let's talk it through. So all of that stuff is the things I'm trying to do to get the manager ready and empathetic and open to having the conversation. And so then you got anything else you would say to the manager or are you feeling pretty good.

Stephanie Goss:
No, I feel good about that.

Andy Roark:
Okay. All right. Cool. So then we go to the doctors. The big things that I want to talk about where the doctors is, this is all much healthier if I can frame it as a forward-facing conversation of like, Hey guys, let's talk about medical standards. How do we want to set our medical standards, how do we want to get the team on board with these? Really, a lot of it is a temperature check on where your doctor's about medical standards. And if you have a team that generally agrees that medical standards are good and important, then we're going to start with the understanding that, hey, medical standards are important. If we have a team of doctors that all want to do it their own way and they don't agree about having consistency across the practice, we're going to step backwards, and we're going to do it.
Just know that it's going to increase the timeline it's going to take us to get to where we want to be. And that's okay. Be kind to yourself, be patient with yourself. The first thing we're going to have to do is get everybody to agree that it's important for us to be consistent, and we're going to have to talk to them about why consistency is important, and we're going to have to sell them on the fact that their jobs are going to be easier because the staff will be able to help them more when they know what we're doing and how we're doing it. And we're going to have to tell them we're going to do better medicine and they'll be better patient care and they'll make more money, or whatever their motivators are, we're going to have to get them to buy into a consistent approach across the board.
So that's the first part. And then after we get them to buy in for the needs of a consistent approach, then we're going to have to have the conversation with them about how do we set these medical standards. And that's sort of the conversation that we're going to need to have.

Stephanie Goss:
The only other thing that I would say about the doctors is that I would probably try and do some poking to get them to maybe … especially if there had been already disagreement and emotions, I would probably do some poking to try and get them to unpack the stories they might be telling themselves in their head when somebody who is non-medical staff is questioning, or even if it was a technician who has license is questioning a decision that they made. I would probably try one-on-one before we have the other conversation, get them to poke at that because if I can get them to be vulnerable, if I can get them to acknowledge to the other person, “Hey, when you ask me the question like this, this is the thoughts that went through my head,” I can help set the stage for the empathy to pour out and for the other party to say, “Oh my gosh, that was not what I meant, I never would have wanted you to feel that way.”
So I would probably do some digging with them to try and unpack what are the stories that they might be telling themselves in their head.

Andy Roark:
Yeah, I agree. If there's a specific case where it's this specific type of case where there's a disagreement, and especially if it was based on something that happened last week, I would do the same thing I would do with the manager of assuming good intent, seeking to understand what happened with this case, “walk me through this, walk me through what's going on,” stuff like that.
And then I think it's good to talk to your doctors, not at this time, not about this, but at some point separately talking to the doctors and saying, Hey guys, we've got our medical standards. How do you all want to be made aware of questions about our medical standards?

Stephanie Goss:
Sure. Yeah.

Andy Roark:
And I would say it to the group so that no one feels targeted out. Like, “Hey, Stephanie Goss. If a person has a problem with your medicine, how do you want to find out about that?” It's not that. It's just, Hey guys, the … So now it's presented as education is constant, standards are always changing, the staff wants to know what's going on. If they have questions, I want them to have-

Stephanie Goss:
They need a process.

Andy Roark:
… the ability to ask. And so I'm going to have them. Any of those questions will come up to us, how do you want me to ask you guys about that? Is this a phone call? Do you want me to do it in our one-on-ones? How do you guys want to want to hear about that? And by talking to all the doctors at the same time, I'm setting the expectation that this is a thing that's probably going to happen and it's going to happen to any of you. And it's not bad, it's just they're going to have questions. And so that if and when it happens, it doesn't feel like this horrible, nightmare, scary scenario.
And the last thing I would say is, great guys, we're going to work together on our standards, and I want to keep those things up to date with you guys. What is the best way for us to educate the staff about what our standards are? How do we want to communicate these things so that people know what to expect and how to best support you guys? And those are the types of questions.
Again, what I'm trying to do here is to get the doctor or the doctors into this head space of, Hey, medical standards are important, and the staff cares about medical standards and they're going to have questions about medical standards. And we are a collaborative team who talks through things like that. How do you want to participate in those things? How are we going to send good communication down the chain? And how are we going to receive questions coming up the chain? Because this is how we work together to make sure our hospital continues to function well, and everybody feels good about what we're doing.
And again, all of this is happening before I put the manager and the doctor or the doctors together. This is all priming the pump.

Stephanie Goss:
Okay. So we have meetings with them all separately, and then we've got to get them all on the same page.

Andy Roark:
Yeah. So we got to get them all on the same page. So bringing it sort of together, I'm a big believer that it's probably best if we have medical concerns to have them go through a medical director. And if we don't have a medical director at all, I think that that may be a problem. It's very dicey for the manager to walk in and drop medical concerns on the doctors. I think that's really hard. Part of my setup for this would be … I think this is where you use your medical director is those complaints and concerns should come to the medical director. That way it's almost like a peer reviewing the case and someone who's got some perspective of being in that situation and has some letters behind their name to carry weight of bringing it in. Oftentimes they may be able to add some context that affects how this is presented.
But I really do think working through your medical director is going to be the way to go. And then going into this, if we're going to have this group conversation, we say we're going to sit down with the doctors to talk about what our standard of care is going forward, or making adjustments or things like that. For God sake, start with commonality. And I think you touched on this at the very beginning. Like, what do we all believe in, what are we all trying to accomplish, what do we all think is important, what are we doing here? And I think if we lay down the commonality, what we're all in, we're all looking to do the best for the pets, we're all looking to do a good job, we're all looking to make sure that we make a positive impact in the world, we're all looking to feel like we're making impact day to day on our patients, us, the support staff, the pet owners, we're all doing this.
Now let's talk about standards for all of us so that we can all feel good about this. So start with commonality first, and then start to lay out the spectrum of what guidelines look like. There's a lot of flexibility in what we can do with guidelines. And so I often like to frame the spectrum to show the absurd extremes because it makes people feel not so far away. So for example, I would come in, I would start to have this conversation. I would say something like, “Hey, look, we do not want to have a zero consistency practice wild west. Everybody's free styling. The patient experience, the pet owner experience is radically different every time they come in. Nobody knows what we're doing or why we're doing it. The techs don't trust the doctors. We are not going to have that kind of practice. We are not. We're also not going to have a practice where we dump patients out in the street without any treatment because their owners can't or wouldn't pay for this set standard of care that we chiseled into a piece of stone. We're going to recognize that pet owners are out of our control. The pets are out of our control. And sometimes we have to adjust to the situation to get the best care possible and to protect the relationships that we have. So we're not dumping people out on the street if they're not willing to do everything we recommend. We're also not running a wild west show where everybody's just shooting it out over each case about what we're going to do and what we're not going to do. Let's get somewhere in between those extremes where we all feel good.”
I like that style of setting down two ridiculous extremes, and people go, “Well, obviously, we're not going to dump people on the street,” but what I'm trying to do is to get the people who like rules and who like to see right and wrong. If I set that down just as a joking way, just like I just did it, it frames the issue to say, there's not a right answer, there's a spectrum, and we are picking a space in that spectrum, and that takes a lot of the no subcutaneous fluids are in, or they are out. It's like, no, look, we're trying to land here in the middle. So anyway, I can lower the stakes a little bit and take away that right or wrong mentality. So I try to set it up that way. But that's the big thing.
And the last thing is focus on the future, not the past. Let's talk about what we want to do next time. And some of this stuff is going to be picking a hill and making it beautiful. I tell a story sometimes when I started landscaping, I didn't know where to start because I was just overwhelmed, and my dad told me to pick a hill and make it beautiful, and then pick another hill and make it beautiful. In a couple years, you're going to have something great.
And so a lot of times in management, you just pick a hill. You're not going to create standards for your whole practice in a week. if there's a thing and there's an issue, let's work on that. We're going to work on nutrition recommendations, and then we're going to work on pain control, and then we're going to work on dental standards, and we're going to keep going. And people say it's going to take years. And I'm going to say, you know what, you got years. This is going to be a lifelong process. And then here's the thing, when you get done, it'll be time to start over again and remake the first ones. So that's that. That's all I got.

Stephanie Goss:
Oh, that's where you choose to end.

Andy Roark:
That's it. That's all I got. All right.

Stephanie Goss:
That was a good one.

Andy Roark:
I just ran because we were getting long. Stuff was getting along. We got to get out of here. So I talked us all the way out.

Stephanie Goss:
You talked us out. No, that's great. I love it. I think that's a wrap.

Andy Roark:
Cool man. All right. Thanks for doing this with me. Thanks everybody.

Stephanie Goss:
Yeah, have a great week, everybody.
Well, that's a wrap on another episode of the podcast. And as always, this was so fun to dive into the mail bag and answer this question. And I would really love to see more things like this come through the mail bag. If there is something that you would love to have a talk about on the podcast or a question that you are hoping that we might be able to help with, feel free to reach out and send us a message.
You can always find the mail bag at the website. The address is unchartedvet.com/mailbag, or you can email us at podcastunchartedvet.com.
Take care of everybody, and have a great week. We'll see you again next time.

Written by Dustin Bays · Categorized: Blog, Podcast · Tagged: culture, doctor, management, Practice ownership, Vet Tech

Nov 23 2022

Managing a Neurodiverse Clinic Doctor

Uncharted Veterinary Podcast Episode 206 Cover Image

This week on the podcast…

Dr. Amanda Doran joins Dr. Andy Roark to discuss managing (and being) a neurodiverse doctor. Very little of the conversation is specific to veterinarians as opposed to other members of the vet healthcare team, and everyone in the clinic can benefit from this conversation. We cover common behaviors as well as resources and management strategies for supporting a diverse group of individuals across an organization. Let's get into this!

Uncharted Veterinary Podcast · UVP – 206 – Managing A Neurodiverse Clinic Doctor

You can also listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Amazon Music or wherever you get your podcasts.

Got a question for the mailbag? Submit it here: unchartedvet.com/mailbag


About Our Guest & Recommended Reading

Dr. Amanda Doran: @dr_amanda_doran

Love and Work: How to Find What You Love, Love What You Do, and Do It for the Rest of Your Life – https://amzn.to/3c7ZL5i


Upcoming Events

The Secret Sauce to Optimizing Workflow with Senani Ratnayake

Back by popular demand! It's time to take a look at the workflows that aren't working and come up with a plan to move forward with a strategy that makes sense.

Date: November 30

Time: 5:30pm ET/2:30pm PT – 7:30pm ET/4:30pm PT

Getting The Most Out of Relief Vet Relationships with Dr. Maggie Brown-Bury

Dr. Maggie Brown-Bury is a relief veterinarian in Canada and she is already booked for all of 2023. How does she do it? Who ends up at the top of her list of availability? If you're struggling to find a consistent relief veterinarian or don't know where to start, this 1-hour workshop can help.

Date: December 13

Time: 7pm ET/4pm PT – 8pm ET/5pm PT

All Uncharted Veterinary Community Workshops are LIVE! You will be able to ask the instructor questions that help you address your practice’s unique problems. This will not be 2 hours of silent screen time. Gear up for interactive, fun learning!

JOIN UNCHARTED! https://unchartedvet.com/uvc-membership/


Episode Transcript

Banfield Pet Hospital Logo

This podcast transcript is made possible thanks to a generous gift from Banfield Pet Hospital, which is striving to increase accessibility and inclusivity across the veterinary profession. Click here to learn more about Equity, Inclusion & Diversity at Banfield.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Welcome, welcome, welcome, boys and girls to the Uncharted Veterinary Podcast. I am your host, Dr. Andy Roark. Guys, I am here with the one and only Dr. Amanda Doran. We are talking about managing the Neurodiverse Doctor. We start off talking about that, then we talk mostly about being a neurodiverse doctor and what that is like and what that experience is like. This is a fun episode, it is a make you think episode just about how people are different and about working with people who see the world differently in your practice. I think this is one of those things where we talk about neurodiverse doctors and really we're just talking about is people are people and people are different, and we all have different skills and strengths, and things that we're good at and things that exhaust us, and things that we're not good at.
And we're not cookie cutters. We're our own beautiful distinct human beings. And when you understand that, then a lot of ideas for how to support people become really clear. And so anyway, this is a fun conversation. It's a neat make you think sort of conversation. It's a good reminder about the humanity of our professionals, so whether you are a doctor, or a tech, or front desk, or manager, I think this is going to be just a good general episode to hear. Guys, without further ado, let's get into this episode.

Meg:
And now the Uncharted Podcast.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Welcome to the podcast, Dr. Amanda Doran. How are you?

Dr. Amanda Doran:
I'm great. How are you?

Dr. Andy Roark:
Man, I'm doing great. It is good to see you again. It has been a minute. How are things going?

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Oh, good. Living the dream. Northern Minnesota's very beautiful several months of the year. The rest of the time it is hot.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
But it's gorgeous right now.

Dr. Andy Roark:
That's awesome. Well it's good to see you in person. You actually came down and stayed with me and my family a couple of years ago pre-pandemic.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Right before, yeah.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah, it was right before working on some business projects and that was a awesome thing. And the family says, hi. What are we doing here? We are here, so those who don't know you are Dr. Amanda Doran, you are doing some speaking and writing, especially particularly kind of in the wellness space in vet medicine. You are an associate vet with Minnesota Pets, which is a home hospice veterinary company. And you do a lot of different things. You have a lot of different interests. I love it. I'm a big fan of people having what I call a third space, which is things you do that are like not normal home stuff and not work stuff. And so you have a booth at the farmer's market called Wicked Witch of the West End.
And you also have, you just told me, I was actually humbled. You have 35 cherry tomato plants. I have three tomato plants that I have fought all summer long just to have, and they have a high tomato failure rate. Let's just say that there is a lot fewer harvested than grow on that thing. But anyway, welcome to the podcast. I'm glad you're here. I asked you to be on because you did a workshop for Uncharted very recently that was extremely popular and well attended and it was on managing the neurodivergent doctor. And boy, we got a lot of positive feedback on that session. A lot of people who said they wanted to know more, they weren't able to come to the workshop. And so I just thought that would be a great opportunity to have you in to kind of run through this topic with you. And it's something I really honestly don't know a whole lot about. This is a weakness of my own and so I'm really excited just to start breaking this down, you ready?

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Yeah. Thanks. Good to be here. I feel like we only scratched the surface in the workshop, so definitely.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Oh, I know. Well that was the feedback that I got was there's a lot there. Well, let's just start out at a high level when we talk about managing the neurodivergent doctor, what are we talking about? Give me an idea going into this workshop, and again, neurodivergent can mean a million different things. Help me start to piece this together in my mind. I want to get my head around what am I talking about? I think a lot of us are probably managing neurodivergent doctors and we don't even know that we're doing that. Many of us may be neurodivergent doctors who have not yet realized or recognize that that is a part of who we are. And so talk to me a little bit about that. What does that look like as people come in? Paint me a picture in the clinic of the neurodivergent doctor, if you don't mind.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Absolutely. Yeah, so I think definitely newer terminology that we're talking about. And so I think kind of neurodivergence as a term was really developed to help talk about and develop acceptance for people with autism. But the umbrella's gotten a little bit bigger and includes a lot of other different conditions in neurodivergence. And probably the most common one I think we do see anecdotally and I have personal experience with is people with ADHD. And so these might be people who are having a really hard time managing time, or managing different tasks, or they might have problems with memory, or organizing things, or starting projects and following through, they might have some challenges with emotional control, or paying attention, or focusing, they might get sucked into the vortex of time in the exam rooms, and might have a hard time consistently following goals, especially with something that they're not interested in. And we are neurodiverse as a population.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah, so like goals that were set from someone else?

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Yeah, if it's something that people don't have a strong interest in, they might have a hard time working towards that goal.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Okay, so going back to those things, do me a favor, pick back up. And so you listed time management, task management, organizing, emotional control, paying attention, pick back up with neurodivergence. We're all sort of a diverse group and just kind of I think that's a laundry list of behaviors sort of help to put that into an organized framework, I guess. How do you start to look at these things?

Dr. Amanda Doran:
I guess essentially what neurodiversity means is that within our population of humans, we have a variation of cognitive function, right? Our population is neurodiverse, and in kind of thinking back to like back to basics of left brain versus right brain and kind of logic versus creativity and how we process things and how we engage in projects and how we perceive things and even how we solve problems. We all have all the things, but we do different things differently. And there's kind of this societal standard and then many people have traits that make it easier for them to adapt to those standards. And some people have traits that maybe are leaning a little bit more towards right side of the brain and make it more difficult to adapt to those expectations or those cultural standards that we have.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Sure.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Does that kind of make sense?

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah. Yeah, no, it does. I will tell you sort of, okay, I like the way that you're starting to lay this things out, so I'll just sort tell you a position that I sort of have on the way that people's minds work and where it comes from.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Yeah.

Dr. Andy Roark:
I was diagnosed with attention deficit disorder when I was in the second grade. And the doctors, the psychologist who did the child testing, told my parents not to expect too much from me. I probably wouldn't go to college, I probably wouldn't go on and do these other things. And my dad was a surgeon, so I think that that was the idea my parents maybe had. Now this was in 1982, which is the stone ages for child psychology, things like that. I am, listen, this is how I think about it, so I said something, I have a friend and her child was just diagnosed with attention deficit disorder and he is about seven years old now, I think.
He's probably second grade, something like that. And my friend had just gotten the diagnosis of her child had ADD, and she was obviously kind of worried about what does this mean and things like that. And what I said to her was, I'll tell you based on my life experience, we live our lives in a construct. I think that was made. We've got this crazy system, pardon the phrase, but we have this ridiculous system where kids are supposed to go and sit on their bottom for six to eight consecutive hours with a 15 minute recess break, which is what elementary school kids get now. And that's how their success is measured, is their ability to sit still and to take these tests that are put in front of them. And I say, this is ridiculous. Think back about how evolutionarily we came along.
The kid that never sat still, that was always exploring, that was always sort of investigating and doing new things, that loved to socialize with others, that kid's bound for success in the wild in a lot of ways. But that's not what success today looks like in the modern society that we have. And so when I think a lot about that, I will say that a lot of my career success comes from my inability to calm my mind in a lot of ways. I'm known as a pretty creative person. I like to think that I'm a fairly innovative person. Innovation and creativity come from smashing disparate ideas together, taking something and combining it with something else. And that's just kind of what my brain does. But if you are looking for somebody who can come and sit at a desk for eight consecutive hours and push paperwork, I'm not your guy, I'm never going to make it. And that's just the way that I am wired.
And so when you talk about neurodivergence and you talk about all the different types of behaviors that we see people who are not organized raising my hand, people who have problems paying attention, raising my hands, people who forget things, raising my hand. I check those boxes and that's sort of where I am. And so my big thing is I think that people have often thought that they is normal and abnormal and I reject that categorization. I would say what's what is beneficial is often context specific. And some of us may not thrive in the classic academic or classic work environments because that's not how we're wired. But that does not mean we are wildly successful in other ways or in other, I don't know, pathways. I know doctors who are forgetful and they can't stay focused and they're creative and funny and kind of, there's people who are sort of scattered and they bounce all over the place and the clients love them, the client, the techs are driven nuts by them, but the clients love them because they're fun and they're engaging.
Yeah, exactly right. Amanda is raising her hand. Exactly right. And I go, that's not a downside to me. And that's why I wanted to bring you on here was my position very much is I don't buy this normal/abnormal categorization in a lot of ways. I think that we all have strengths and we all have weaknesses and we're all very different. I think understanding what your strengths and weaknesses are is absolutely vital to your career success. I think having an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the people that you manage, I think that, that's vital to being a good manager. If you take someone who has a hard time organizing and push them into a position where they are going to organize come hell or high water, you're often going to burn that person out rather than have them figure it out. That's just my position. I'm curious how that sounds as I say it?

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, that's going to make some people miserable. This makes me think of this book that I read recently by Marcus Buckingham, it's called Love Plus Work. And he was one of the people that developed the Strengths Assessment and he talked about strengths and weaknesses in a way that I'd never heard before. And it changed a lot of perspective for me and not so much as strengths are things that you're good at and weaknesses are things that you're bad at, but strengths are actually as things that give you strength, give you energy. You don't have to be good at it, but do you like it? Do you want to do it? Do you want to get better at it?

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
And weaknesses as things that you don't like, you can be really, really good at things that you hate doing. There is definitely some things in general practice that I had to adapt to and put masks on for and cope with that from the outside looks like strengths because I was really good at it, but I hated it. It left me completely drained at the end of the day. And so-

Dr. Andy Roark:
Oh interesting.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
I think as employee and manager kind of working together to help people find what are those strengths? And it's not, like you said, not necessarily giving people things. Like if you don't like organizing, you're going to have a hard time doing it. Are you in the right seat on the bus following your strengths, finding that love in your work and if you have that drive to want to do the thing that you like, even if you're bad at it, you can put in the hours to get better at it. And I think we don't always know what those things we are, we don't feel like we're allowed to follow those loves. I feel like that was one of my challenges in practice. I feel like I have to do this but I don't really want to do it, but I'm good at it and people keep telling me I should keep doing it but I kind of hate it.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Yeah, finding those strengths and redefining, what does it mean. A lot to unpack there.

Dr. Andy Roark:
There's a lot to unpack there. I completely agree. Okay.

Stephanie Goss:
Hey friends. It's Stephanie and I'm jumping in here for one quick second because there's a workshop coming up and it is one of the last ones for this year of 2022. And I want to make sure that you don't miss it because it is coming to you from my dear friend Maggie Brown Bury. Maggie is a former emergency veterinarian who lives in Newfoundland, Canada. And a few years ago Maggie made the decision to make a change and she moved out of ER medicine into being a relief veterinarian. And I remember Maggie telling us within weeks of opening up her schedule, her whole first year was booked. And so we asked Maggie to come and do a workshop for how to get the most out of the relationships that you build as a practice with your relief veterinarians.
Because more and more practices as we face the veterinarian shortage, are struggling with needing to have relief doctors on their schedule maybe more regularly than we would have previously. And he's got some great ideas after working with a ton of different practices on how you can leverage that relationship and set yourself up for success, set your relief veterinarian up for success, and set your clients up for success, so if this sounds like something you'd be interested in, head on over to unchartedvet.com/events and find all of the information about the workshop and how to sign up. I hope to see you there. And now back to the podcast.

Dr. Andy Roark:
One of the things I always talk to people about when we talk about employee management is there's two different questions that I usually ask about employees, is when you're trying to delegate something away, you're like, Hey, would you do this thing for me? The question is, does the person get it? Meaning do they understand what you're asking for or what needs to happen? And the next question is, do they want it? And to your point, there are a lot of us that are good at things that we don't enjoy. This is an interesting idea of your strengths are things that give you strength and your weaknesses, you might be good at them, but they take strength from you, they take effort. There are things that I am good at that people ask me to do and they are exhausting and there are things that I am good at, people ask me to do that once you ask me to do them, I'm not going to stop.
I'm just going to get going and I am going to shake hands and kiss babies or kiss hands and shake babies, whatever, I'll just get going. And I'm not going to quit because I love doing it. But I think that's a really interesting way to think about it, so is this being good at something and wanting to do that thing I think are entirely different. I also really like your thoughts about when you are someone who has different skill sets, when you have these things that make you happier, that fill you up and things that don't. And you got to march to the beat of your own drum as a lot of us do. I think that there is a lot of weight in the veterinary culture on behaving in a certain way and following certain norms that have been laid down. And again, I'm just sort of talking off the cuff here, but you can't tell me that… We all took the same path, right.
We all went through undergraduate to become veterinarians and then we went through vet school and then there's some strong cultural norms in vet medicine and we all think that a veterinarian looks a certain way or acts a certain way and the technicians look a certain way or act a certain way or things like that. And I feel like there is this implied pressure to conform in a lot of ways. And I have found, and this is so stupid and simple, but for years people have asked when they ask for any career advice or anything, I always tell them the most valuable thing that I have ever found that I tell everybody is if you want to be successful, figure out what you like doing and figure out how to do more of it and figure out what you don't like doing and figure out how to do less of it.
And I think a lot of people don't think they have permission to do that. They're like, no, I have to do all of the vet things. And I go, no you don't. You're talking to a guy who literally works one day a week in the vet clinic and otherwise does what he wants to do. I was doing Facebook and people were telling me I was ridiculous and why are you spending your time doing Facebook? And I was like, it worked out for me in the long run. But those, I enjoyed it. I enjoyed expressing myself and this was before I didn't enjoy Facebook anymore, but at the time I enjoyed expressing myself and doing those things and other people, I mean I made these goofy, I don't know if back in the day I made these goofy videos that I, there's videos out there of me in a dog suit, a hundred percent running around.
And I remember well respected colleagues of mine being mortified on my behalf that I was making these things and I was like, I think it's funny. I am having a good time and I get that it's not your thing but I can do it. And it makes people laugh and I enjoy it. It makes me excited about that medicine so I'm going to do it. I really like that you said that it was like, I think some of us maybe need permission to say I'm not going to function the way that the other doctors do in the practice and I'm going, Hey buddy, as long as you can make that swing around and balance out with other people so their needs are being met and that you are not leaving other people hanging, go forth with confidence and do it.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Yeah. Well, I think if anything it helps. It's helped me show up better every day when I do work, when I'm able to do those things. I think more so than balance or harmony, it's this idea of resonance. There's never going to be this perfect scale where it's like okay, my work and my life are balanced. It's kind of taking that it's like a dance that you have to do those other things. I remember hearing everybody say that in vet school. Oh yes, you must have these things outside of veterinary medicine that you do.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
But I feel like it's one of those lessons where you got to get burned. Some people know fire back because they've been told, well you got to figure out for yourself. Nobody knows what you love. And I think a lot of times we're conditioned to look for that external validation of people saying, yes, you're doing the thing. But it's a huge shift to shift that internally and follow what your weird little heart wants.

Dr. Andy Roark:
I completely agree with that, but I think when we're talking about managing people who are just different or who marched to the beat of their own drum.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Yeah.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Or just have different skills, I think that not waiting for someone else to validate you is so important. And I think it's really hard. I think a lot of us who approach the world of differently, I think a lot of us live in shame, you know what I mean? Why can't I keep my calendar the way that other people do and why can't I just sit down and do these things that other people just sit down and grind through? And I say, look, we all have to figure out how to get those things done. We all have to figure out our own ways. But I completely agree with you as far as I think that we need to think about what makes us happy and making sure that we're doing the things we need to do.
But beyond that, the fact that the other doctors don't work one day a week, they work six days a week or four days a week, that doesn't affect me. That's not what I'm doing right now and that's not taking anything away from them. But I'm not doing it and I'm not feeling bad about not doing it. This is kind of where I am and what I'm doing. And so I think a lot of us need to hear that as, hey, this is fine.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Yeah.

Dr. Andy Roark:
As far as the work life balance stuff, it's funny you bring that up. I had a conversation literally yesterday with a good friend of mine and we were talking about work life balance and I've never been able to categorize work life balance like a lot of other people can. I've never been able to be like this in my work self and this is my home self. And it is just, again, because of I think, the way that I see the world or whatever, that split has never worked for me, so I'm a big fan of Danny McVety calls it work life integration and it's just sort of like, I do a lot of different stuff.
I mean I write about that medicine when I'm at home and sometimes when I'm at the vet clinic on my lunch break, I'm doing other things and just I hang out with the technicians and we'll talk about our hobbies and just geek out about whatever the TV shows we're watching are, things like that. But I just mix those things together. But for me it's an outlet that works and keeping it separate just doesn't work for me.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Yeah.

Dr. Andy Roark:
But it totally works for other people. And so I would never tell someone else, don't prioritize life balance. I would just say, well life balance for me looks very different than it does for other people. But I know after 15 years of doing it this way as a professional, this works for me and that's it. Well let's bring this back around to what this looks like professionally and working with others.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Yeah.

Dr. Andy Roark:
And so we talked about managing sort of a neurodiverse doctor. We all have these different ways of approaching our job, of what we're good at. It's funny that when I said What does this look like? You listed a long string of problems, you know what I mean, of like oh they forget this. So this person, they don't get that done and they don't do this. What's funny is that when we ask about a neurodivergent doctor, people don't say, oh well these are typically creative people. These are people who bring diversity of perspective to the scene. These are people who often have ideas that others haven't thought about. They're think they're people who maybe have a different perspective when you ask what's going on that you just haven't rolled around and considered.
And I go, we always think about the things that we see where people don't match up in a positive way to the benchmarks that are set, but we don't really stop and say, well why do they exceed these other areas so strongly? I think that that's an important thing to consider when we talk about sort of neurodivergence and neurodivergent doctors is you cannot look at this as a detriment. What you have to do is look at the person as a specific package and start to identify what are their strengths and what are their weaknesses. And I love the idea of the strengths as what fills them up, what makes them stronger. Do you agree?

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Absolutely. And yeah, kind of what we talked about a little bit before in veterinary medicine, we kind of live by this kind of strict calendaring, very planned timeline and that makes some people very, very miserable. And you can very much struggle to manage time and to be productive when kind of the processes and practices that you're using don't match those natural tendencies that you have.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
And so I think when we think about neurodivergence, at least personally as I've started talking about it, people are coming and asking me all the time, how do I help this person who gets sucked into the Bermuda Triangle in an appointment? Whether that's in practice or an in-home euthanasia where they just completely lose track of time. And I think realizing that it's not an intentional disregard, like for some people it is actually a sensory issue and time doesn't exist if you're not looking at it. And so yeah, I was definitely that doctor who you'd send a search party because I was still in the exam room, well after the time it should be over, so I feel like that's where it comes up the most.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah, I definitely see that. I think that to me, again, it depends on the individual a lot. I think classic organization and focus are often things that we see in doctors. What have you seen that can be helpful in setting, I know this is such a broad category of individual, it's hard to drill too deep into specifics, but in general terms, what are the steps that practices take to make these people successful and to bolster them up and to make them feel comfortable and happy in the workplace?

Dr. Amanda Doran:
I think the biggest thing is making sure that there's space to have those conversations. For people to be vulnerable and not blame them and see it as an intentional disregard for time. Helping them be able, you might have to help them a little bit in developing some of those skills, so consciously tracking time, like when are you going in, when are you coming out? What's happening in there? What appointments are these happening in? Are these appointments that give you strength and you're just so excited to talk to these people and help them? Or are these strengths that are weaknesses and it's sucking your energy to be in there and you feel like you can't get out?
Making sure everybody I think it's important for, but especially people who are neurodivergent, making sure you're taking breaks and eating food and going outside and getting exercise. Maybe having an afternoon coffee, because I think you do have a natural tendency to forget to do some of those things. I worked in the practice that didn't have clocks in the room and I found that really challenging. I felt rude always looking at my watch. But unless looking at the clock, I don't know times exists. And even when I was in general practice, kind of having buffer time in throughout the day to make sure I had a quiet place to go with no noise to catch up on my records so that I wasn't doing other things.
Because there's always 10,000 things going on in the treatment room and you want to help people. But unless I had a quiet place with no distractions, I couldn't get my records done before the end of the day. And I think another thing that would be helpful too is doing some role playing with language to help move visits along. I think sometimes we don't necessarily know the words to help people get back on track and be like, okay, what is our intention for this appointment? What is our desired income? What words can we give people to have light, moderate, or more heavy nudges to get us back on task? And I think those skills kind of develop over time, not the classes that they have in school always.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah. Oh no, I love it. I just wrote down words to move appointments along. I'm like, oh, that's super great. Okay, so what I hear you saying, and this all makes total sense with me, I really love it. Assume good intent. We talk a lot uncharted about assuming good intent and just say, this person, they're not running late because they don't care, they're not failing to fill out paperwork because they're jerks and they're disrespecting you or blah blah, blah. Assume good intent. Everybody's trying their best. Some things come easier to some people than other people. I think that's just a great opening head space. I love the idea of just asking what happened. When this person is running late instead of saying, you are not going fast enough. It's going, Hey, I'm noticing that you're getting stuck in these rooms or you're spending a lot of time in certain rooms.
Why do you think that is? Is there something, and the rooms that you were in, why do you think that ended up being a trap? I also love flipping it around. I'm a big fan of positive inquiry, which is asking people about what worked well and then figuring out why it worked well, so you can know other places, so I can say, Hey, yesterday I felt like you were really moving efficiently through the exam rooms. I felt like you were doing a great job as far as staying on time. And that's what the tech said. What was good about yesterday? Why do you think you were you able to do that so well? And that can often give you some insight into, oh, this is how I support this person. And they go, oh well, yesterday I saw these types of appointments or I had this set up, or yesterday my technician was doing this thing that was helpful for me.
And I go, ah. And now it's not, Hey, tell me about why you're failing. Tell me about why you're running behind. Tell me about why people are frustrated.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Great.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah, it's tell me about why these appointments were particularly good. And I've just found that, that is a very soft, nice way to get, it's to help me to help you you know what I mean? Help me help you. I don't know what's going to be helpful for someone else, especially someone who sees the world differently or perceives it differently than I do or has different strengths than I have. I'm like I don't know how to help you because I don't have the skills that you have, I have different skills and I really like that. And then the big thing is, and the way I just phrased it is the way I would phrase it talking to the person, is not what can we do to get you to conform?
What can we do to fix you? No, it's what can I do to support you? How can I help you? How can I lift your workload? How can I make your time here more enjoyable? How can I help you meet the needs of the staff or any of those things? But how can I help you? How can I support you? What would you like me to do? What would make your time here easier? What would set you up for success? What does a great day of appointments look like for you? Those are all the types of questions that I try to get to get in there and develop specific action steps to support this person at an organizational level without making them feel like, oh, you are coming up short and so I need to give you a crutch. It's not that. And I don't want anybody to feel that way.
And that's not true. It really is more you kick butt in a different way than the rest of the doctors do. And so I need to make sure that you have support for your style and I need to understand what that would be, because I don't know your style as well as you do. And then I really like your point about enforcing breaks. I just, it's funny as you say that, I go, oh man, that makes so much sense of, hey, we've all had doctors that we have to stuff a sandwich into their hand and be like, you need to eat this. When was the last time you went to the bathroom? When was the last time you drank water, Amanda? We've all had those conversations, right?

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Have you seen the sun today?

Dr. Andy Roark:
It's so simple. Yeah, exactly. But that makes so much sense when you say that. And I go, oh, and it's an easy thing to do and it's a good thing to do, right? I mean, many of us work in states where breaks are enforced. A lot of us work in states where that's not necessarily true. We should still do it. And I just think that this is a good thing. It's one of those things where sometimes you slow down to go fast. And I find that that's really true in taking care of our staff and our doctors, especially with some people. I have to get them to slow down so that they can feel better, and so that they can focus, and so that they can then be productive and we can go fast. And so I think all of those are really, really great. Amanda, do you have resources that you really like? You mentioned one of the Love and Work book.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Yes.

Dr. Andy Roark:
I'm going to check that out. It's not one I'm familiar with. Any other resources that pop to your mind that you think are particularly useful that you like?

Dr. Amanda Doran:
I do like reading books about time management, particularly related to neurodivergent people because I feel like a lot of the kind of more popular books, some of those things don't work. And so even people who may experience neurodiversity, even looking into like ADHD coaches or other people to help with non-traditional kind of executive functioning I found is really helpful.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Yeah.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Part of that is I don't really remember names very well.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Sure, gotcha.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Yeah.

Dr. Andy Roark:
What does somebody search for to find that, because you're talking about this thing, and I'm like that makes total sense to me. It's not a genre that I'm familiar with. What are some of the terms that when you look like you said executive functioning, coaches, ADHD coaches, things like that-

Dr. Amanda Doran:
ADHD Coaches.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Are there certain terms that you kind of look for?

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Yeah, I feel like ADHD coaching is a big thing that's becoming more popular. Or maybe just noticing it more and even kind of learning more about time and how different people relate to time and how it varies for everybody. We talked just briefly about those kind of languages for progressing with visits. I'm doing a talk at the hospice conference later in the fall kind of talking about how to do that with in-home euthanasia visits. And yeah, just kind of recognizing some of the more traditional approaches for kind of “neurotypical” people. If you feel like you're struggling with them as a neurodivergent person, it may be that there are other resources that can be helpful, so ADHD coaching is something that's really helped me and those people are full of resources.

Dr. Andy Roark:
That's awesome. That's really, really cool. Amanda, where can people find you online? Where can they follow you and keep up with your adventures?

Dr. Amanda Doran:
I do have a website @dramandadoran.com and the little social media on the Instagram @dramandadoran. And you can also find Wicked Witch West End on Instagram too. But most of my projects and other things that I've done on that Dr. Amanda Doran website, and if anybody has questions or wants to reach out, my email address is dramandadoran@gmail.com.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Awesome. That sounds great. Well thank you so much for that, guys. I'll put links to everything we talked about down in the show notes.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Thank you.

Dr. Andy Roark:
Everybody have a wonderful week. Amanda, thanks again for being here.

Dr. Amanda Doran:
Thank you, Andy.

Dr. Andy Roark:
And that is our show. Guys, I hope you enjoyed it. I hope you got something out of it. Got to give us a special shout out to Banfield the Pet Hospital for making transcripts possible. Speaking of inclusion and accessibility in vet medicine, Banfield makes transcripts possible so that people can more easily access the information in this podcast. And they didn't have to do that and we could not do it without them, so I just got to stop and give a shout out to those guys. Guys, if you got any questions for us, shoot us a question in the mail bag. The email address is podcast@unchartedvet.com and Stephanie Goss and I are happy to tackle that. I'll be back with the goddess Stephanie Goss next week and we will see you then. Take care, everybody.

Written by Dustin Bays · Categorized: Blog, Podcast · Tagged: doctor, management, neurodiverse

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Go to Next Page »
  • Membership
  • Account
  • Cart
  • Privacy

Copyright © 2026 UNCHARTED VETERINARY CONFERENCE | WEBSITE BY OFFICETHUG